CBULF Gratomic Inc. Forecast, Technical & Fundamental Analysis

CBULF in -7.31% downward trend, falling for three consecutive days on January 08, 2025

Moving lower for three straight days is viewed as a bearish sign. Keep an eye on this stock for future declines. Considering data from situations where CBULF declined for three days, in of 296 cases, the price declined further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In of 51 cases where CBULF's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .

The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on December 31, 2024. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on CBULF as a result. In of 92 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .

CBULF moved below its 50-day moving average on January 08, 2025 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.

Bullish Trend Analysis

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for CBULF just turned positive on January 06, 2025. Looking at past instances where CBULF's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in of 60 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .

The 10-day moving average for CBULF crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on December 27, 2024. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In of 14 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .

Following a 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where CBULF advanced for three days, in of 187 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .

Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)

The Tickeron Valuation Rating of (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.024) is normal, around the industry mean (7.393). P/E Ratio (0.000) is within average values for comparable stocks, (104.300). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (3.023). CBULF has a moderately low Dividend Yield (0.000) as compared to the industry average of (0.055). P/S Ratio (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (254.496).

The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. CBULF’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.

The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. CBULF’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 87, placing this stock worse than average.