The investment seeks long-term growth of capital... Show more
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Category MidCapGrowth
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PJFM | 67.12 | N/A | N/A |
| PGIM Jennison Focused Mid-Cap ETF | |||
| PSEP | 45.87 | -0.04 | -0.08% |
| Innovator US Equity Power Buffer ETF-Sep | |||
| IWR | 107.95 | -0.28 | -0.26% |
| iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF | |||
| EMXF | 58.05 | -0.77 | -1.30% |
| iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF | |||
| NIOG | 17.03 | -1.55 | -8.37% |
| Leverage Shares 2X Long NIO Daily ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHCZX has been closely correlated with FSMAX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 98% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CHCZX jumps, then FSMAX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CHCZX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHCZX | 100% | N/A | ||
| FSMAX - CHCZX | 98% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| PMBCX - CHCZX | 86% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| RPMGX - CHCZX | 84% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| PAMCX - CHCZX | 84% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| PEMGX - CHCZX | 84% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||