IFABF broke above its upper Bollinger Band on January 03, 2025. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 28 similar instances where the stock broke above the upper band. In of the 28 cases the stock fell afterwards. This puts the odds of success at .
The Stochastic Oscillator has been in the overbought zone for 1 day. Expect a price pull-back in the near future.
The Aroon Indicator for IFABF entered a downward trend on December 27, 2024. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The RSI Oscillator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where IFABF's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, of 39 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are .
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on December 30, 2024. You may want to consider a long position or call options on IFABF as a result. In of 76 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are .
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for IFABF just turned positive on December 26, 2024. Looking at past instances where IFABF's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in of 50 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to consistent earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. IFABF’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.766) is normal, around the industry mean (3.082). IFABF's P/E Ratio (97.479) is considerably higher than the industry average of (28.555). IFABF's Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is slightly lower than the industry average of (1.991). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.036) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (1.813) is also within normal values, averaging (1.500).
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. IFABF’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 80, placing this stock worse than average.
Industry ApparelFootwear
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
ALTL | 38.59 | 0.53 | +1.39% |
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF | |||
EVUS | 29.69 | 0.17 | +0.59% |
iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Value ETF | |||
EWS | 22.02 | 0.12 | +0.55% |
iShares MSCI Singapore ETF | |||
SLYV | 88.84 | 0.44 | +0.50% |
SPDR® S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF | |||
MBND | 27.40 | 0.08 | +0.29% |
SPDR® Nuveen Municipal Bond ETF |
A.I.dvisor tells us that IFABF and GRNL have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IFABF and GRNL's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IFABF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
IFABF | 100% | N/A | ||
GRNL - IFABF | 6% Poorly correlated | +0.84% | ||
GXSBY - IFABF | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
HNNMY - IFABF | -0% Poorly correlated | +1.53% | ||
HUGPF - IFABF | -2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
CDGXY - IFABF | -6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |