The RSI Oscillator for MNTS moved out of oversold territory on February 14, 2025. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 40 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In of the 40 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at .
The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 17 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.
Following a 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where MNTS advanced for three days, in of 208 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .
MNTS moved below its 50-day moving average on January 22, 2025 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
The 10-day moving average for MNTS crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on January 15, 2025. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In of 16 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .
The 50-day moving average for MNTS moved below the 200-day moving average on January 16, 2025. This could be a long-term bearish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where MNTS declined for three days, the price rose further in of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .
The Aroon Indicator for MNTS entered a downward trend on February 20, 2025. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (3.527) is normal, around the industry mean (8.876). P/E Ratio (0.067) is within average values for comparable stocks, (68.637). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (2.752). MNTS has a moderately low Dividend Yield (0.000) as compared to the industry average of (0.015). P/S Ratio (1.178) is also within normal values, averaging (8.040).
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. MNTS’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. MNTS’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 71, placing this stock worse than average.
a blank check company that will not involve in any operations until after the completion of its initial business combination
Industry AerospaceDefense
A.I.dvisor tells us that MNTS and AZ have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MNTS and AZ's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MNTS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
MNTS | 100% | +3.86% | ||
AZ - MNTS | 26% Poorly correlated | +4.82% | ||
PKE - MNTS | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.28% | ||
PL - MNTS | 25% Poorly correlated | -3.20% | ||
RKLB - MNTS | 24% Poorly correlated | -2.58% | ||
NPK - MNTS | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.65% | ||
More |