The investment seeks to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the price and yield performance of the ROBO Global® Robotics and Automation Index... Show more
ROBO seeks to track the ROBO Global Robotics and Automation Index, a global benchmark of companies engaged in robotics, automation, and related enabling technologies. Launched in 2013, the fund uses a tiered, modified equal-weight methodology rather than a market-cap approach, which spreads risk across roughly 80 holdings and keeps the top ten positions collectively below about 20% of assets.
The portfolio is anchored by industrial automation and technology names, including Teradyne (TER), Ambarella (AMBA), Rockwell Automation (ROK), Novanta (NOVT), IPG Photonics (IPGP), Intuitive Surgical (ISRG), Illumina (ILMN), and JBT Marel (JBTM), alongside non-U.S. leaders such as Fanuc, Harmonic Drive Systems, and Infineon Technologies. Industrials represent roughly 44% of assets and information technology about 42%, with smaller allocations to healthcare and consumer discretionary. Geographically, the United States accounts for roughly 43%, Japan near 20%, and Germany about 10%. The fund's net expense ratio is 0.95%.
The robotics and automation theme sits at the intersection of two structural forces: labor-cost management and the diffusion of artificial intelligence into physical systems. Manufacturers are investing in machine vision, collaborative robotics, and warehouse automation to raise productivity, while semiconductor and sensing companies supply the underlying components. This long-run demand story has historically been paired with pronounced cyclicality, because much of the fund's revenue is tied to capital expenditure (capex) cycles in factories and logistics.
The macroeconomic backdrop adds tension. Elevated interest rates raise the discount rate applied to the mid-cap growth companies that dominate ROBO's roster, while also pressuring industrial buyers' financing costs. At the same time, reshoring trends and AI infrastructure build-outs support demand for automation hardware. Inflation dynamics and central-bank policy therefore matter as much to this ETF as any single product cycle, because the portfolio blends economically sensitive industrial names with higher-multiple technology suppliers.
ROBO has traded in a wide range over recent months. After climbing from its spring lows near the high-$60s to a 52-week high around $90 in late spring, the fund pulled back through June and July into the mid-$70s before stabilizing in the low-$80s. This pattern reflects a rotation out of higher-valuation growth and cyclical technology holdings, followed by partial recovery.
Over the trailing 30 days, ROBO is up roughly 2%, a comparatively muted move for a thematic fund whose five-year annualized volatility has historically run above 20%. Over the trailing quarter, the fund is down about 5%, consistent with a broader consolidation in mid-cap technology and industrial automation equities rather than a sharp, single-driver selloff. The modified equal-weight structure has tempered the impact of any one holding, but the portfolio's tilt toward mid-cap names makes it more sensitive to shifting rate expectations than a mega-cap-heavy technology fund would be.
Investors evaluating thematic exposures like ROBO can streamline their research with Tickeron's AI Screener. This AI-powered stock and ETF discovery platform scans thousands of securities using technical indicators, fundamentals, volatility measures, AI-generated signals, market trends, price patterns, and customizable filters. It helps users surface trending securities, breakout candidates, and new trading opportunities far more efficiently than manual screening. Whether you are tracking robotics, automation, or a different sector theme, the AI Screener offers a structured way to identify and compare opportunities aligned with your strategy. Explore the AI Screener to see how data-driven screening can sharpen your research process.
Several structural factors will likely shape ROBO through 2026. The path of monetary policy remains central, since lower rates would tend to support the fund's mid-cap growth and cyclical holdings, while persistently restrictive policy could keep a lid on valuations and capital expenditure. Investors should also watch the earnings cycles of major holdings across semiconductor test, machine vision, and industrial automation, where order trends provide a leading read on factory and logistics investment.
Beyond macro conditions, the competitive landscape matters. ROBO overlaps only partially with more concentrated robotics and AI funds, and its broader geographic mix exposes it to Japanese, German, and Taiwanese automation leaders as well as U.S. names. Structural themes—reshoring, labor shortages, and AI-enabled hardware—remain supportive over the long run, but near-term performance will likely hinge on capital flows into thematic ETFs, sector rotation, and the durability of industrial demand. As always, investors should weigh these opportunities against concentration, cyclical, and geopolitical risks without assuming past performance will repeat.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
ROBO saw its Momentum Indicator move below the 0 level on August 18, 2026. This is an indication that the stock could be shifting in to a new downward move. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 74 similar instances where the indicator turned negative. In of the 74 cases, the stock moved further down in the following days. The odds of a decline are at .
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for ROBO turned negative on August 20, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 45 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In of the 45 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at .
ROBO moved below its 50-day moving average on August 18, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where ROBO declined for three days, the price rose further in of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .
ROBO broke above its upper Bollinger Band on August 04, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for ROBO entered a downward trend on August 07, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 2 days, which means it's wise to expect a price bounce in the near future.
The 10-day moving average for ROBO crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on August 12, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In of 17 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .
Following a 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where ROBO advanced for three days, in of 333 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Category Technology