Go to the list of all blogs
Scott Bell's Avatar
published in Blogs
Nov 13, 2026
TickeronGET DAILY SIGNALS
Analyzing the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) Through a Free Cash Flow Lens

Analyzing the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) Through a Free Cash Flow Lens

Key Takeaways

  • Rate and inflation sensitivity: The fund's high free cash flow (FCF) yield tilt tends to hold up better when tighter financial conditions and elevated capital costs favor companies that self-fund their operations.
  • Sector outlook: Heavy exposure to technology, healthcare, and energy links the ETF's future outlook to software cash generation, healthcare pricing dynamics, and the commodity cycle.
  • Portfolio exposure risk: The strategy excludes financials, utilities, and real estate entirely, making it structurally underweight rate-sensitive and defensive segments.
  • Fund flow dynamics: Competition from newer free-cash-flow ETFs has intensified, and sustained relative underperformance could pressure net inflows.
  • Upcoming catalysts: Quarterly index reconstitution, Federal Reserve policy shifts, energy prices, and earnings revisions among top holdings are the key swing factors.
  • Structural strength: A rules-based quality screen and a 2% single-stock cap help limit concentration risk in a market increasingly dominated by megacap technology names.

Portfolio Exposure and ETF Strategy Overview

The Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) is a passively managed exchange-traded fund that seeks to track the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. The index applies an objective, rules-based methodology to the Russell 1000 universe, screening for U.S. large- and mid-capitalization companies with the highest free cash flow yields. Free cash flow is the cash a company generates after capital expenditures, and a high FCF yield signals that a business is producing abundant cash relative to its enterprise value—a hallmark of so-called "cash cows."

Constituents are weighted by trailing twelve-month free cash flow, with each position capped at roughly 2% at the quarterly rebalance. The fund carries a net expense ratio of 0.49% and holds about 100 securities. Its portfolio exposure is spread across technology (roughly 23%–26%), healthcare (about 20%–22%), energy (approximately 11%–20%), consumer cyclical, consumer defensive, communication services, industrials, and basic materials. Notably, financials, utilities, and real estate are effectively absent.

Top holdings have historically included names such as CRM, PFE, T, VZ, COP, and MPC. Because the fund avoids the mega-cap growth names that dominate cap-weighted benchmarks, its future performance potential hinges on whether cash-generative, reasonably valued companies attract capital as investors weigh quality and valuation against momentum. From what I see, this approach offers a useful counterbalance in concentrated markets.

Major Catalysts Ahead

Several forward-looking developments could shape this ETF forecast:

  • Federal Reserve policy and interest rates: Falling rates reduce the appeal of cash-heavy balance sheets' safety premium but also lower financing costs broadly. A slower easing cycle could favor cash-generative companies that do not depend on external funding.
  • Inflation and energy prices: The fund's meaningful energy allocation makes it sensitive to crude oil and refined-product prices. Sustained commodity strength could support earnings for refiners and integrated producers, while a downturn would weigh on the sector.
  • AI-driven capital expenditure: As megacap technology firms ramp up spending on data centers, their FCF outlooks are being revised downward. This dynamic reinforces the relative appeal of the high-FCF companies the index selects. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the stock compares to others in the industry.
  • Quarterly reconstitution: The index rebalances each quarter, which can meaningfully shift sector weights—technology and energy exposures in particular have swung notably between reconstitutions.
  • Earnings revisions: Revisions for major healthcare and communication services holdings directly influence the fund's aggregate earnings and cash-flow profile.
  • Competitive fund flows: Rival strategies such as VFLO and FLOW use forward-looking or different FCF screens. If investors migrate toward these alternatives, COWZ could face relative outflows.

Sector, Index, and Macroeconomic Outlook

The macro outlook for COWZ is shaped by the intersection of interest rates, inflation, and the equity market's leadership. In an environment where capital costs remain elevated, companies with strong internal cash generation are better positioned to fund buybacks, dividends, and organic reinvestment without issuing debt. This is a structural tailwind for a free-cash-flow-weighted portfolio.

Sector cycles matter as well. The healthcare exposure ties the fund to pharmaceutical pipelines and drug-pricing policy, while the technology sleeve is concentrated in mature software and hardware businesses with steady cash flow rather than early-stage growth. Energy exposure adds cyclicality linked to global supply-demand balances. On the index level, value and quality factors have historically performed better when market leadership broadens beyond a narrow set of megacap growth stocks—an important consideration given the rising concentration of the S&P 500 in a handful of AI-related names. Currency and global growth trends are secondary, since essentially all holdings are U.S.-listed companies.

Long-Term Outlook and Structural Trends

Over a longer horizon, several structural themes could influence COWZ's trajectory. The free-cash-flow quality screen is fundamentally a bet on capital discipline, which tends to become more valued during periods of higher rates or economic uncertainty. Demographic trends, including an aging population with growing demand for healthcare services, support parts of the fund's healthcare allocation. Meanwhile, the secular build-out of artificial intelligence infrastructure—while not directly held in concentrated form—creates a backdrop in which cash-generative, non-megacap businesses may look comparatively attractive as a diversification tool.

Interest rate cycles, the pace of earnings growth across cyclical sectors, and the ongoing shift toward passive, factor-based investing all play a role. The strategy's exclusion of financials and utilities means its long-term return profile will depend heavily on technology, healthcare, and energy cycles. Market structure changes, including rising index concentration, may also encourage investors to seek alternatives that reduce single-theme risk. These structural forces frame the fund's long-term outlook without implying any specific return forecast.

Using Tickeron’s Trend Prediction Engine for ETF Analysis

In my view, Tickeron’s Trend Prediction Engine has been a helpful addition to my routine when reviewing funds like COWZ. It provides AI-driven forecasts on potential bullish, bearish, or sideways moves over the next week or month, along with historical context and alerts. I find it useful for layering quantitative signals onto the fundamental drivers discussed above, particularly when evaluating how macro shifts might influence sector exposures or individual holdings.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Related Ticker: COWZ

Contributor

Scott Bell's AvatarScott Bell|Expert

I’m a trader and independent researcher. My interest lies at the intersection of financial markets, algorithms, and capital management. I develop data-driven tools and strategies and study algorithmic approaches to market analysis. I help turn complex market data into clear insights and practical systems. I believe technology should support, not replace, investment thinking


COWZ sees its Stochastic Oscillator recovers from oversold territory

On November 10, 2026, the Stochastic Oscillator for COWZ moved out of oversold territory and this could be a bullish sign for the stock. Traders may want to buy the stock or buy call options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 57 instances where the indicator left the oversold zone. In 52 of the 57 cases the stock moved higher in the following days. This puts the odds of a move higher at over 90%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

COWZ moved above its 50-day moving average on November 09, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.

The 10-day moving average for COWZ crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on October 21, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 15 of 16 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.

Following a +0.98% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where COWZ advanced for three days, in 271 of 320 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 85%.

COWZ may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.

The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 270 of 338 cases where COWZ Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 80%.

Bearish Trend Analysis

The 10-day RSI Indicator for COWZ moved out of overbought territory on October 23, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 39 similar instances where the indicator moved out of overbought territory. In 33 of the 39 cases, the stock moved lower in the following days. This puts the odds of a move lower at 85%.

The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on November 12, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on COWZ as a result. In 68 of 87 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 78%.

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for COWZ turned negative on November 05, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 48 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 40 of the 48 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 83%.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where COWZ declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 78%.

Notable companies

The most notable companies in this group are Chevron Corp (NYSE:CVX), International Business Machines Corp (NYSE:IBM), Gilead Sciences (NASDAQ:GILD), Verizon Communications (NYSE:VZ), QUALCOMM (NASDAQ:QCOM), Salesforce (NYSE:CRM), Pfizer (NYSE:PFE), ConocoPhillips (NYSE:COP), Accenture PLC (NYSE:ACN), AT&T (NYSE:T).

Industry description

The investment seeks to track the total return performance, before fees and expenses, of the Pacer U.S. Cash Cows Growth Index (the "index"). The index uses an objective, rules-based methodology to provide exposure to large and mid-capitalization U.S. companies with high free cash flow yields. Companies with high free cash flow yields are commonly referred to as "cash cows". Under normal circumstances, at least 80% of the fund's total assets will be invested in U.S.-listed equity securities that are the component securities of the index.

Market Cap

The average market capitalization across the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) ETF is 65.65B. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from 15.9B to 417.06B. CVX holds the highest valuation in this group at 417.06B. The lowest valued company is CDE at 15.9B.

High and low price notable news

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) ETF was 2%. For the same ETF, the average monthly price growth was 3%, and the average quarterly price growth was 14%. ON experienced the highest price growth at 17%, while FSLR experienced the biggest fall at -12%.

Volume

The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) ETF was -40%. For the same stocks of the ETF, the average monthly volume growth was -9% and the average quarterly volume growth was -36%

Fundamental Analysis Ratings

The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows

Valuation Rating: 67
P/E Growth Rating: 49
Price Growth Rating: 40
SMR Rating: 49
Profit Risk Rating: 62
Seasonality Score: 15 (-100 ... +100)
Real Time Patterns 3
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
A.I.Advisor
published price charts
Interact to see
Advertisement
BZ dropped sharply, sliding from a $16.72 prior close to $13.48 (-19.38%), with the decline beginning in premarket and deepening into the early regular session. No verified company-specific news or fundamental catalyst was issued; the fall tracked a broad China ADR selloff (the Nasdaq Golden Dragon index slid more than 2%), but that alone is too small to explain a ~20% drop — the stock's Hong Kong listing fell only -2.6%.
NBIS fell from $154.69 to $129.12, down -16.53%, with the decline starting in premarket trading and continuing through the regular session. The drop followed Q3 results: revenue of $980.8M (+571% YoY) beat estimates, but management cut 2026 revenue guidance to the low end of its range on third-party capacity delays and raised 2026 capex to roughly $27B, reviving financing and execution fears.
The $1.14 central target is not an analyst consensus; it is the all-cash merger consideration in GoPro, Inc. (GPRO) 's pending deal with Starman Optical, agreed in September 2026. With the stock trading near $0.88, reaching $1.14 would require a move of roughly 29.5%.
The central target of $21 is the arithmetic mean of three recently attributable analyst price targets on RUM — $25 (Lake Street), $15 (Texas Capital), and $22 (Maxim Group) — which average roughly $20.67. With shares trading near $5.90 after a post-earnings surge, reaching $21 would require a gain of roughly 256%, a very large move.
The $1 target in this article is not an analyst price target; it is the $1.00 Nasdaq minimum bid price requirement, the level Cenntro itself has publicly targeted through a 1-for-60 reverse stock split. Cenntro trades near $0.12 per share, meaning reaching $1 would require an increase of roughly 730%—an exceptionally large move.