This article's central target of $64 reflects the arithmetic mean of the verified analyst price targets reviewed. The average across roughly 15 analysts tracked by S&P Global is reported near $64.27, with individual targets ranging from $22 to $93. MarketBeat's wider 20-analyst sample places the average near $61, a reminder that the precise mean varies with the analyst set included.
Views diverge widely. Needham analyst John Todaro reiterated a Buy but cut his target to $70 from $83 in early October 2026, citing higher data-center regulatory risk and tougher financing. UBS initiated coverage with a Buy and a $38 target in late September, while Jones Research began with a Buy and a $70 target. Wells Fargo raised its target to $55, B. Riley moved to $75, and Morgan Stanley holds a more measured Equal Weight stance with a target in the low-$40s. At the cautious end, Rothschild & Co Redburn initiated at Neutral with a $22 target, arguing credit markets are already pricing elevated risk.
The $22-to-$93 range is unusually wide and reflects genuine disagreement over how to value a company whose earnings are still negative and whose worth hinges on executing a multi-gigawatt buildout. Bullish analysts lean on discounted long-run EBITDA and contracted lease visibility; cautious ones stress financing and valuation risk. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the stock compares to others in the industry.
With the stock near $23.25 (its October 12, 2026 close) and a 52-week range of roughly $19.01 to $50.73, reaching $64 would require an increase of about 175% from current levels — a very large move even for this volatile name.
The path toward such a target would depend almost entirely on de-risking the buildout story. Fiscal Q1 2027 (ended August 31, 2026) revenue rose 432% year over year to $341.9 million, but the company posted a net loss of $237.1 million, with much of the revenue tied to lower-margin tenant fit-out services. Needham models a multi-year climb in adjusted EBITDA to roughly $2.3 billion by fiscal 2029, meaning the market is valuing APLD on 2028-2029 earnings rather than current results. That leaves a wide gap between today's price and the average target that can only close through successful lease signings, on-time energization, and disciplined funding.
The 52-week high of about $50.73 (May 2026) sits well below the $64 target, meaning the share price would first need to reclaim that prior peak and then extend beyond it — itself a meaningful hurdle. The $19-to-$23 zone, where shares have recently traded and where Redburn's $22 target sits, has acted as a support area. The broader trend since the May peak has been lower, and a sustained move toward $64 would require breaking that downtrend and clearing the high-$20s and low-$30s, where the stock spent much of 2026. From what I see, monitoring these levels closely helps frame the risk-reward picture.
Analyst price targets generally reflect a roughly 12-month research horizon, though individual assumptions differ, and several targets are anchored to fiscal 2028-2029 EBITDA rather than near-term results. Investors should monitor quarterly earnings and guidance (the next report is expected around early January 2027), lease-signing announcements for Polaris Forge 2 and Delta Forge, financing developments and debt costs, energization milestones, and analyst target revisions. Interest-rate decisions also matter, given the company's leverage and capital-intensive model. I’m watching this closely as the next catalysts unfold.
In my research process, I often turn to Tickeron’s AI Daily Buy/Sell Signals to complement fundamental analysis on names like APLD. The platform uses artificial intelligence to continuously monitor thousands of stocks and ETFs, generating Buy, Sell, or Hold signals from changing market conditions, technical behavior, and AI-driven analysis. These signals are designed to help traders discover opportunities, monitor existing positions, and identify shifting trends more efficiently than manual screening alone. For those following APLD's volatile tape, automated signal monitoring can provide an additional, data-driven layer to a broader research process.
The $64 central target for Applied Digital is the arithmetic mean of a wide and contested set of analyst price targets ranging from $22 to $93, and it implies a roughly 175% advance from a recent price near $23.25 — a very large move. The bull case rests on contracted hyperscaler demand, a multi-gigawatt pipeline, and access to scarce power and financing. The bear case points to persistent net losses, roughly $6.5 billion in debt, customer concentration, and the risk that valuation compresses if execution slips. The $22-to-$93 spread underscores that analysts are not in agreement; the mean is a useful benchmark, not a forecast or a guarantee. What happens next depends primarily on lease signings, energization milestones, and funding — and investors should weigh those catalysts against the company's leverage and still-negative earnings.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Harry Richardson — Algorithmic Trader & Strategy Developer Harry is an algorithmic trader specializing in impulse and breakout trading strategies across cryptocurrency and equity markets. With more than 10 years of experience in developing automated trading systems, he focuses on building structured algorithms designed to capture momentum while maintaining strict risk control. His approach combines quantitative analysis, real-market execution, and continuous performance monitoring. Vitalii prioritizes risk management, drawdown control, and strategy stability over short-term optimization, ensuring algorithms are adaptable to changing market conditions. He has developed and tested hundreds of automated strategies, working extensively with live trading environments, forward testing, and portfolio-level algorithm management. His work centers on transforming trading ideas into fully operational, scalable automated systems.
Moving higher for three straight days is viewed as a bullish sign. Keep an eye on this stock for future growth. Considering data from situations where APLD advanced for three days, in 261 of 295 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 88%.
The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 8 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on September 30, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on APLD as a result. In 77 of 89 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 87%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for APLD turned negative on September 30, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 45 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 40 of the 45 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 89%.
APLD moved below its 50-day moving average on September 23, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where APLD declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 89%.
The Aroon Indicator for APLD entered a downward trend on October 12, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 49 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (4.274) is normal, around the industry mean (7.552). P/E Ratio (0.000) is within average values for comparable stocks, (68.701). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (2.284). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.010) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (10.977) is also within normal values, averaging (143.599).
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 74 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. APLD’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 93, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 77 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. APLD’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 95 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Industry InformationTechnologyServices