Banco Santander Chile ranks among Chile’s largest banks, so its quarterly numbers offer useful insight into local lending trends, deposit flows, and inflation dynamics. A sizable share of its loan portfolio is tied to inflation-linked units, which means earnings can shift noticeably with changes in consumer prices. In 3Q26, inflation eased to 0.6% from 2.5% the previous quarter, trimming readjustment income and adding pressure to the bottom line. I find it helpful to track these reports because they highlight loan growth, asset quality, cost control, and whether the bank is on pace for its full-year ROAE target of 24% or higher. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how BSAC compares with peers in the region.
For the period ended September 30, 2026, Banco Santander Chile posted net income attributable to owners of CLP 237 billion ($1.30 per share and US$0.50 per ADR). That represented a 38.0% decline from 2Q26 and a 4.2% drop from 3Q25, mainly due to lower net income from readjustments in a softer inflation setting, reduced fee income, and higher loan-loss provisions.
The quarterly outcome came in below consensus expectations of about US$0.65 per share. Net revenue contracted 1.5% year over year, and the 19.1% ROAE fell short of the bank’s full-year goal. Net interest income and readjustments still rose 7.0% year over year, backed by a nine-month net interest margin of 4.1%.
Over the first nine months, net income increased 11.9% to CLP 893 billion (US$4.74 per share and US$1.94 per ADR), producing an ROAE of 24.5%. The efficiency ratio improved to 33.0% from 35.9% a year earlier, and operating expenses fell 4.2% year over year. Total loans grew 1.8% quarter over quarter, total deposits rose 2.8%, and customer funds advanced 3.7%. The CET1 ratio held at 10.9%, with a capital adequacy ratio of 16.3%.
The 3Q26 numbers underscored how much Santander Chile earnings can move with inflation-linked readjustment income. The sharp sequential decline in profit, together with the earnings-per-ADR miss, is likely to keep attention on the path of Chilean inflation and the central bank’s policy direction. Some positives, such as better efficiency, steady capital, and modest growth in loans and deposits, may help balance concerns about the softer quarter. Sentiment ahead of the release was already measured because of lower inflation expectations and softer commercial lending, and the results reinforced the idea that profitability remains closely tied to macroeconomic conditions.
After the third quarter, the main focus should stay on how Chilean inflation develops, given that readjustment income remains a key driver of quarterly earnings. Sustained changes in inflation directly affect net interest margin and net interest income.
Cost discipline and efficiency trends are also worth following. Management has stressed careful expense management, and the improvement in the efficiency ratio to 33.0% indicates the bank is maintaining a leaner cost base. Keeping that momentum while funding digital initiatives will be important to monitor.
Loan growth and credit quality deserve attention too. Commercial lending showed early signs of recovery, while consumer, mortgage, and auto lending stayed positive. The higher provisions recorded this quarter point to some normalization in credit costs, so tracking the cost of risk in upcoming periods makes sense.
Capital returns remain relevant as well. The bank lifted its dividend provision from 60% to 70% of 2026 profits and maintains a CET1 ratio of 10.9%, which suggests room to support shareholder distributions if profitability holds. The fourth quarter and any updated full-year guidance will help clarify whether the bank can return to its 24%-plus ROAE target.
One resource I turn to regularly for additional perspective is Tickeron’s AI Screener. It lets me apply filters across technical patterns, fundamentals, and performance metrics to compare individual names like BSAC against broader industry groups. This kind of screening helps place quarterly results in a wider context without replacing traditional fundamental work.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Sergey Savastiouk, Ph.D. has a degree in Applied Mathematics from Moscow University and has extensive experience as an entrepreneur, investor, manager, and mathematician. His professional expertise is in applied mathematics, mathematical modeling, system and pattern analysis, and software and hardware system integration. He has served as the CEO of several hi-tech start-up companies and nonprofit organizations, which has given him proven capabilities in business strategy for high-tech start-up companies, market assessment, company formation, team building, product development, marketing, and sales. He has published numerous articles in journals and magazines on related fields. As a retail investor, he spent 15 years developing his proprietary trading and quantitative algorithms (now Tickeron’s A.I.), which brought him significant returns in trading the stock market. His current work and goal in founding Tickeron is to bring professional, sophisticated stock market analysis capabilities to retail investors via an easy-to-use interface.
Moving lower for three straight days is viewed as a bearish sign. Keep an eye on this stock for future declines. Considering data from situations where BSAC declined for three days, in 137 of 256 cases, the price declined further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 54%.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 23, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on BSAC as a result. In 40 of 84 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 48%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for BSAC turned negative on October 27, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 51 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 26 of the 51 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 51%.
The Aroon Indicator for BSAC entered a downward trend on October 29, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The RSI Oscillator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where BSAC's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 15 of 19 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 79%.
The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 46 of 67 cases where BSAC's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 69%.
Following a +1.99% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where BSAC advanced for three days, in 242 of 351 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 69%.
BSAC may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 1 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 4 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is seriously undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: BSAC's P/B Ratio (0.003) is slightly lower than the industry average of (1.271). P/E Ratio (0.013) is within average values for comparable stocks, (13.491). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (2.596) is also within normal values, averaging (1.190). BSAC's Dividend Yield (0.166) is considerably higher than the industry average of (0.035). P/S Ratio (5.236) is also within normal values, averaging (3.738).
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 14 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 57, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 58 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. BSAC’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 97 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
a regional bank
Industry RegionalBanks