Bank of Hawaii stands as one of the largest independent regional banks serving Hawaii and the West Pacific. Its quarterly results often reflect both local economic conditions and the broader repricing pressures facing regional lenders. The bank has delivered nine straight quarters of growth in net interest income (NII) and NIM, supported by fixed-rate asset repricing and careful deposit pricing. With interest-rate expectations evolving and deposit competition heating up, the upcoming report will show whether that expansion can persist. In my view, the print will provide timely insight into loan growth, funding costs, and credit quality at a moment when year-end margin targets and share-buyback plans remain important valuation drivers. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the stock compares to others in the industry.
Third-quarter 2026 results have not yet been released, so attention remains on the path set in earlier periods. In the second quarter of 2026, the company posted diluted EPS of $1.47, net income of $63.8 million, NII of $153.6 million, and a NIM of 2.78%. Management has reiterated its expectation for NIM to approach 2.9% by the end of 2026, with December NIM projected near 2.90%, and noted that earning-asset yields should continue improving at a similar pace if rates stay stable. On the deposit side, the cost of deposits is forecast to settle between 1.25% and 1.30% in the near term, while higher-cost public deposits are expected to partially run off. Investors will also track progress toward the full-year lower-middle-single-digit loan growth target and any further changes in the criticized-asset ratio.
Sentiment ahead of the third-quarter release reflects mixed signals. Shares declined after the second-quarter report even though earnings beat expectations, as lower fee income and falling deposit balances offset strong NII growth. Since then, the focus has shifted to whether margin expansion can continue without putting significant pressure on deposit volumes. Key risks include competitive deposit pricing, the runoff of higher-cost public funds, and the possibility that the criticized-asset ratio stays elevated. A solid NIM trajectory paired with stable credit metrics would likely be viewed positively, while signs of faster deposit-cost pressure or softer loan pipelines could weigh on the stock.
Once the third-quarter numbers are out, the top item to monitor is whether management reaffirms its year-end NIM target near 2.9%. Because the bank has relied on fixed-rate asset repricing to boost yields, the pace of that benefit will be an important swing factor in coming quarters. I’m watching closely to see if earning-asset yields keep improving at the roughly five-basis-point-per-quarter rate observed recently.
Deposit dynamics form another critical theme. Management has guided for the cost of deposits to settle near 1.25% to 1.30%, and it expects certain higher-cost public deposits to run off in the third quarter. Any deviation could alter the near-term margin outlook. Loan growth will also matter, with commercial and industrial lending and residential mortgages driving recent production and the company targeting lower-middle-single-digit growth for the full year.
Credit quality and capital deployment remain in focus as well. Asset quality has stayed strong, though the criticized-asset ratio rose last quarter due to a single borrower relationship rather than broad weakness. Investors will track the pace of share repurchases, which management has indicated could rise toward the $15 million to $20 million range per quarter. Together, these elements will shape how the market interprets the bank’s earnings path into year-end.
I often turn to Tickeron’s AI Screener when preparing for earnings seasons like this one. It lets me quickly filter regional banks on fundamentals, technical patterns, and performance metrics to see how BOH stacks up against peers. This tool has helped me surface ideas more efficiently than manual screening and has become a regular part of my workflow for financial-sector analysis.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Sergey Savastiouk, Ph.D. has a degree in Applied Mathematics from Moscow University and has extensive experience as an entrepreneur, investor, manager, and mathematician. His professional expertise is in applied mathematics, mathematical modeling, system and pattern analysis, and software and hardware system integration. He has served as the CEO of several hi-tech start-up companies and nonprofit organizations, which has given him proven capabilities in business strategy for high-tech start-up companies, market assessment, company formation, team building, product development, marketing, and sales. He has published numerous articles in journals and magazines on related fields. As a retail investor, he spent 15 years developing his proprietary trading and quantitative algorithms (now Tickeron’s A.I.), which brought him significant returns in trading the stock market. His current work and goal in founding Tickeron is to bring professional, sophisticated stock market analysis capabilities to retail investors via an easy-to-use interface.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for BOH turned positive on October 15, 2026. Looking at past instances where BOH's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 33 of 44 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 75%.
The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where BOH's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 18 of 25 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 72%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 20, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on BOH as a result. In 50 of 81 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 62%.
Following a +2.41% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where BOH advanced for three days, in 164 of 286 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 57%.
The Stochastic Oscillator has been in the overbought zone for 2 days. Expect a price pull-back in the near future.
The 50-day moving average for BOH moved below the 200-day moving average on October 07, 2026. This could be a long-term bearish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where BOH declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 70%.
BOH broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 22, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for BOH entered a downward trend on October 23, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 15 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 57 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. BOH’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 66 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 71 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.820) is normal, around the industry mean (1.271). P/E Ratio (13.026) is within average values for comparable stocks, (13.247). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.240) is also within normal values, averaging (1.190). Dividend Yield (0.040) settles around the average of (0.035) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (3.951) is also within normal values, averaging (3.738).
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 85 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 95 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. BOH’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 56, placing this stock worse than average.
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
a regional bank
Industry RegionalBanks