Clearwater Paper serves as a key independent supplier of paperboard packaging products to North American converters, so its results offer a window into demand and pricing trends across the packaging supply chain. The company approached this report following a difficult first half that included weather-related issues in the first quarter and softening paperboard prices. I was particularly interested in whether an improving SBS market and tighter cost controls could help offset those pressures. The quarter also carried strategic significance because Clearwater Paper completed a full debt refinancing, extended maturities, and continued expanding into new product lines, making this both a financial checkpoint and an update on its longer-term turnaround efforts.
For the third quarter ending September 30, 2026, Clearwater Paper reported net sales of $384.9 million, down from $399.0 million in the same period last year. The decline reflected a 4% drop in the paperboard average net selling price to $1,111 per ton, with sales volumes easing 1% to 322,265 tons. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to compare industry positioning.
The company posted a net loss of $1.6 million, or $0.10 per share, narrowing sharply from a net loss of $53.3 million, or $3.51 per share, a year earlier. The prior-year period had included a $48.0 million goodwill impairment. On an adjusted basis, EBITDA was $24 million, within the company's guidance range of $20 million to $30 million and supported in part by $17.5 million in representation and warranty insurance proceeds received during the quarter.
Management noted that an operational disruption at its Augusta mill late in the quarter pressured volumes and costs. On the balance sheet, net debt fell to $260.7 million at September 30, 2026, and the company completed a refinancing that extends its debt maturity profile to 2031.
Heading into the report, the market's focus was split between Clearwater Paper's ability to narrow losses and evidence that paperboard pricing had stabilized. The narrower net loss, in-line adjusted EBITDA, and the completed refinancing were viewed as steps in the right direction, while the year-over-year decline in selling prices and the Augusta mill disruption tempered enthusiasm. Sentiment was also shaped by management's upbeat commentary on a continued recovery in SBS industry conditions, balanced against acknowledged cost headwinds in transportation and chemicals. The refinancing, which reduces refinancing risk and extends maturities to 2031, was a notable positive for investor confidence in the company's financial flexibility.
Looking ahead, management struck an optimistic tone on the SBS pricing environment, noting that industry forecasts point to improved pricing later in the fourth quarter and into 2027. Executives indicated that realizing these increases could help offset cost pressures and move the company back toward its target cross-cycle adjusted EBITDA margins and cash flows.
Investors should monitor several key factors in the coming quarters. First, watch whether announced SBS price increases actually materialize and hold, since pricing recovery is central to the margin story. Second, track input costs, particularly transportation and chemicals, which management has flagged as ongoing headwinds.
Product-line expansion also remains a catalyst. Clearwater Paper launched its Circa CRB offering and is advancing a CUK product line, with a formal launch targeted by the end of the year. These initiatives aim to broaden the company's offering to independent converters, though their contribution is expected to build gradually.
Finally, a leadership transition is underway, as Chief Financial Officer Sherri Baker's resignation is set to take effect in mid-November 2026. How the company manages this transition, alongside continued debt-reduction efforts and the execution of its pricing recovery, will be closely watched.
I often turn to Tickeron’s AI Screener when evaluating companies like this one. It lets me quickly filter for comparable names in the packaging sector, review technical patterns, and check fundamentals side by side. The tool has been helpful for spotting how Clearwater Paper stacks up against peers on volatility and performance metrics, giving me a clearer picture before forming a view on the quarter.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Sergey Savastiouk, Ph.D. has a degree in Applied Mathematics from Moscow University and has extensive experience as an entrepreneur, investor, manager, and mathematician. His professional expertise is in applied mathematics, mathematical modeling, system and pattern analysis, and software and hardware system integration. He has served as the CEO of several hi-tech start-up companies and nonprofit organizations, which has given him proven capabilities in business strategy for high-tech start-up companies, market assessment, company formation, team building, product development, marketing, and sales. He has published numerous articles in journals and magazines on related fields. As a retail investor, he spent 15 years developing his proprietary trading and quantitative algorithms (now Tickeron’s A.I.), which brought him significant returns in trading the stock market. His current work and goal in founding Tickeron is to bring professional, sophisticated stock market analysis capabilities to retail investors via an easy-to-use interface.
CLW broke above its upper Bollinger Band on September 22, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 37 similar instances where the stock broke above the upper band. In 31 of the 37 cases the stock fell afterwards. This puts the odds of success at 84%.
CLW moved below its 50-day moving average on September 24, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
The 10-day moving average for CLW crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on September 30, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 10 of 16 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 62%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where CLW declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 75%.
The Aroon Indicator for CLW entered a downward trend on October 23, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 46 of 60 cases where CLW's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 77%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 23, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on CLW as a result. In 71 of 97 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 73%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for CLW just turned positive on October 23, 2026. Looking at past instances where CLW's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 32 of 49 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 65%.
Following a +2.94% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where CLW advanced for three days, in 179 of 279 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 64%.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating for company is 24 (best 1 - 100 worst), which means the company is slightly undervalued. The valuation of the company is based on a proprietary formula which takes into account a set of fundamentals and gives us an estimate of the price per share for the company. We then compare this estimate with the current price per share. As a result, this company is rated as undervalued in the industry. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (0.392) is normal, around the industry mean (0.376). P/E Ratio (-6.304) is within average values for comparable stocks, (2.377). CLW's Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.010) is slightly lower than the industry average of (0.185). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.757) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.223) is also within normal values, averaging (0.381).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 47 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. CLW’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 63 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 92 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. CLW’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 99, placing this stock worse than average.
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
a maker of paper and related products
Industry PulpPaper