Go to the list of all blogs
Scott Bell's Avatar
published in Blogs
Oct 21, 2026
TickeronGET DAILY SIGNALS
CONY vs MSTY: Weighing YieldMax's Crypto-Linked Option Income ETFs

CONY vs MSTY: Weighing YieldMax's Crypto-Linked Option Income ETFs

Key Takeaways

  • Both CONY and MSTY are actively managed, single-stock "derivative income" ETFs from YieldMax that use a synthetic covered call strategy to pursue current income with capped upside.
  • CONY is tied to the share price of COIN (Coinbase Global), while MSTY is tied to MSTR (MicroStrategy, now operating as "Strategy"), giving them different crypto-adjacent exposure profiles.
  • Both funds are non-diversified and highly concentrated, with the bulk of assets held in U.S. Treasury securities used as options collateral rather than in the underlying stocks themselves.
  • Expense ratios are nearly identical, at 1.04% for CONY and 1.03% for MSTY, and both funds are structurally geared toward income rather than capital appreciation.
  • MSTY carries materially higher volatility risk because MSTR operates as a leveraged proxy for Bitcoin, whereas CONY's exposure reflects a crypto exchange operator.

Why These Two ETFs Draw Attention

CONY and MSTY are frequently compared because they belong to the same fast-growing product family: YieldMax's suite of option-income ETFs. The two funds do not directly compete for identical exposure, but they serve a similar investor goal — generating high current income from the volatility of a single, crypto-linked stock while accepting a cap on upside gains. For income-oriented investors deciding between the two, the structural differences matter: CONY derives its strategy from Coinbase Global, a cryptocurrency exchange platform, while MSTY is built around MicroStrategy, a company whose balance sheet is dominated by Bitcoin holdings. This ETF comparison clarifies how sector exposure, fund performance, and relative positioning diverge despite a shared engine.

Diving Into CONY

CONY seeks current income with a secondary objective of gaining exposure to the share price of Coinbase Global (COIN), subject to a limit on potential gains. Launched in August 2023, it is an actively managed, non-diversified fund that employs a synthetic covered call strategy — meaning it does not hold COIN shares directly but instead buys call options and sells put options to replicate exposure, then sells short-term call options against that synthetic position to generate premium income. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the holdings compare to peers in the category.

The portfolio is typically concentrated in roughly 25 holdings. Its top positions are overwhelmingly U.S. Treasury bills and notes, which serve as collateral for the options overlay, alongside COIN call options and a government money-market fund. Net expense ratio is 1.04%, which is elevated relative to conventional index ETFs but typical for this specialized derivative-income category. Distributions are generally declared on a monthly basis and can fluctuate significantly with options premium levels.

Understanding MSTY

MSTY pursues the same objective as CONY but is tied to the share price of MicroStrategy (MSTR), now operating as "Strategy," subject to a cap on gains. Launched in February 2024, it is also an actively managed, non-diversified fund using an identical synthetic covered call framework: synthetic long exposure to MSTR, short call options sold for income, and U.S. Treasuries held as collateral.

MSTY holds roughly 20 positions, with U.S. Treasury bills and notes again dominating the top of the list, followed by MSTR call options and a government money-market fund. Its net expense ratio is 1.03%, marginally below CONY. Like CONY, MSTY distributes income regularly and is designed for investors prioritizing current income over full participation in the underlying stock's upside. The key differentiator is the nature of the underlying company: MSTR's equity behaves more like a leveraged Bitcoin vehicle than a conventional operating business.

The Broader Market Context

Both funds sit at the intersection of the crypto/digital-asset theme and the options-income segment. Recent market cycles have been shaped by Bitcoin's price action, the growth of spot Bitcoin exchange-traded products, evolving U.S. regulatory posture toward digital assets, and shifts in interest-rate expectations. Higher short-term Treasury yields have supported the collateral income component of these strategies, while crypto volatility has boosted options premiums. At the same time, this environment has produced sharp drawdowns: because covered call strategies retain most of the downside of the underlying stock while capping upside, both funds can decline substantially during crypto selloffs even as they distribute income.

How Performance and Positioning Compare

In recent weeks and across recent market cycles, MSTY has exhibited greater volatility than CONY, reflecting MSTR's status as a high-beta, Bitcoin-linked treasury company versus COIN's role as an exchange operator with more diversified revenue lines. Both funds have generated elevated distribution yields, but both have also experienced significant price depreciation on a total-return basis in the recent period, consistent with the asymmetric payoff of synthetic covered call strategies during market downturns. Fund performance here is best understood as a function of each underlying stock's earnings cycle and crypto exposure: COIN's results track trading volumes and platform activity, while MSTR's value hinges heavily on Bitcoin prices and its accumulation strategy. Investors weighing relative positioning should recognize that MSTY offers more amplified crypto sensitivity, whereas CONY provides comparatively broader, though still concentrated, exposure to the digital-asset economy.

Forward-Looking Assessment

On a forward-looking, probabilistic basis, Tickeron's AI would likely favor CONY for investors seeking comparatively less extreme volatility within the options-income crypto theme. While MSTY has historically delivered higher income and stronger momentum during Bitcoin rallies, its underlying (MSTR) behaves as a leveraged Bitcoin proxy, exposing shareholders to outsized drawdown risk that can erode total return even when distributions are high. CONY's underlying (COIN) is still volatile but has a more diversified operating business, and its expense ratio difference (1.04% versus 1.03%) is negligible. The AI's preference therefore hinges on risk-adjusted structural strength rather than yield alone, favoring CONY's comparatively balanced risk profile in the current market environment.

Using Tickeron Tools for ETF Analysis

One tool I turn to regularly when comparing specialized ETFs like these is Tickeron's AI Screener. It allows filtering by technical patterns, fundamentals, volatility, and performance metrics to quickly surface relevant ideas and compare holdings across similar strategies. This helps streamline research without manual effort, especially when evaluating concentrated option-income products in fast-moving themes like crypto.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Related Ticker: CONY, MSTY

Contributor

Scott Bell's AvatarScott Bell|Expert

I’m a trader and independent researcher. My interest lies at the intersection of financial markets, algorithms, and capital management. I develop data-driven tools and strategies and study algorithmic approaches to market analysis. I help turn complex market data into clear insights and practical systems. I believe technology should support, not replace, investment thinking


CONY in +0.84% Uptrend, growing for three consecutive days on October 13, 2026

Moving higher for three straight days is viewed as a bullish sign. Keep an eye on this stock for future growth. Considering data from situations where CONY advanced for three days, in 176 of 191 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 11 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.

CONY may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 02, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on CONY as a result. In 44 of 49 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for CONY turned negative on September 30, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 26 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 25 of the 26 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 90%.

CONY moved below its 50-day moving average on October 16, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.

The 10-day moving average for CONY crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on October 19, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 7 of 7 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where CONY declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.

The Aroon Indicator for CONY entered a downward trend on October 20, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

Industry description

The investment seeks current income; the secondary investment objective is to seek exposure to the share price of the common stock of Coinbase Global, Inc. (“COIN”), subject to a limit on potential investment gains. The fund will employ its investment strategy as it relates to COIN regardless of whether there are periods of adverse market, economic, or other conditions and will not seek to take temporary defensive positions during such periods. The fund is non-diversified.
View a ticker or compare two or three
CONY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
A.I.Advisor
published price charts
A.I. Advisor
published General Information

General Information

Category Trading

Category
Derivative Income
Address
United States
Phone
N/A
Web
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement
The Bitwise Solana Staking ETF (BSOL) advanced roughly 18% over the trailing 30 days, closely tracking a sharp rally in Solana (SOL). The move extends a broader recovery, with BSOL up approximately 77% over the past three months from its mid-2026 trough.
MSTY is an actively managed single-stock option income ETF (exchange-traded fund) that writes call options on Strategy (MSTR), formerly MicroStrategy, to generate current income. The portfolio is anchored by U.S. Treasury bills and MSTR option contracts rather than a diversified basket of equities, concentrating exposure in one volatile underlying.
AMDL has surged roughly +64% over the past 30 days, from about $47.59 to $78.10, mirroring a powerful rally in its sole underlying stock, AMD . The fund is a leveraged single-stock ETF (exchange-traded fund) designed to deliver 2x the daily return of AMD, amplifying both gains and losses.
TSMX, a 2x daily leveraged single-stock ETF (exchange-traded fund), rose roughly +19% over the trailing 30 days, rebounding sharply from mid-September lows. The fund seeks 200% of the daily return of TSM (Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing), meaning its moves are roughly double the underlying stock's daily swings.
Contracted revenue anchor: A roughly $3.2 billion, seven-year LNG (liquefied natural gas) supply agreement with Puerto Rico has received final approval, providing multi-year cash-flow visibility if execution stays on track. Project pipeline inflection: Upcoming milestones include the Barcarena and PortoCem power plants in Brazil, a potential Gás Sul terminal restart, and optimization of the company's modular "Fast LNG" (FLNG) liquefaction fleet.
AMD (Advanced Micro Devices) designs central processing units (CPUs), graphics processing units (GPUs), and AI accelerators, while LRCX (Lam Research) supplies the wafer-fabrication equipment used to build advanced chips. AMD has delivered strong double-digit revenue growth on AI data-center demand, but its shares trade with elevated expectations that can trigger sharp reactions around earnings.
Origination momentum: Velocity Financial enters 2026 off record annual originations of roughly $2.7 billion (up about 48%), positioning it to keep gaining share in a fragmented investor-loan market. Credit normalization is the central watch item: Nonperforming loans fell toward the 8.5% range of portfolio unpaid principal balance (UPB), but asset quality remains the primary swing factor for earnings.
Turnaround milestone ahead: Management has pointed to reaching cash generation in 2027, making the pace of cost discipline and margin recovery the central question for the stock forecast. Fresh capital supports execution: A recently announced $45.5 million equity financing, with participation from management and a single institutional investor, strengthens the balance sheet as the company funds its transformation.
NFE closed at $5.51, down -6.13% during Tuesday's regular session, extending a slide that has pushed shares near a 52-week low. Primary catalyst: the company disclosed its Fast LNG unit is offline after a gas-turbine mechanical failure, with return to service not expected until Q4.
The central $11 target is the arithmetic mean of four verified analyst price targets, rounded from roughly $10.75. With the stock near $2.06, reaching $11 would require an upside of more than 400%, an extremely large move.
The $23 central target is the rounded arithmetic mean of four verified analyst price targets, which average $23.25. The latest verified price is around $9.57, meaning the target implies roughly 140% upside—a very large move.
NXH closed down -11.17% (-$0.23) to $1.83 on Oct 6, the most recent regular session, extending a steep two-day decline. Selling continued as investors digested the mutual termination of the Fathom Holdings merger and a dilutive $45.5M registered direct offering of ~16.5M shares at $2.76.
AMD is a large-cap designer of CPUs (central processing units) and GPUs (graphics processing units) competing directly with Nvidia in the AI accelerator market, while FORM is a small-cap provider of semiconductor test and measurement equipment, primarily probe cards. AMD's narrative has been driven by multi-billion-dollar hyperscaler deals, while FORM's has been powered by record revenue and sharp margin expansion tied to high-bandwidth memory (HBM) demand.
AMD has surged roughly 200% year to date, crossing a $1 trillion market capitalization on AI data-center demand and a "CPU renaissance" narrative. KLAC has gained about 71% year to date, supported by record process-control revenue and rapid growth in advanced packaging for AI chips.
AMD is a large-cap semiconductor designer riding explosive AI compute demand, while ENTG is a mid-cap supplier of materials and purity solutions that feed the same AI-driven chip cycle. AMD recently crossed a $1 trillion market capitalization on surging data center revenue, whereas ENTG operates at a far smaller scale (roughly $23 billion) with steadier, double-digit growth.
VELO closed Tuesday at $9.57, unchanged (+0.00%) from the prior session, with the move occurring during regular market hours. The flat close marked stabilization after Monday's -14.5% plunge, when shares fell to $9.57 from $11.20 following disclosure of CFO James Suva's departure.
The $8 target used here is a technical, publicly discussed recovery objective — not an analyst consensus — because legacy analyst price targets were set before NFE's restructuring and reverse stock split. New Fortress Energy Inc. ( NFE ) trades near $5.51, so reaching $8 implies a roughly 45% advance.
AVBP plunged -46.98% during Tuesday's regular session, closing at $15.09 versus $28.46, marking its worst single-day decline on record. The catalyst was the Phase 3 FURVENT trial of firmonertinib failing its primary endpoint—progression-free survival—in first-line EGFR exon 20 insertion non-small cell lung cancer.
Upcoming catalyst: The company's next earnings release is estimated for November 6, 2026, which should offer fresh detail on its SKY token holdings, staking rewards, and treasury strategy. Strategic positioning: SDEV is an on-chain holding company providing public-market exposure to the Sky protocol ecosystem, with SKY as its core digital asset and a stated focus on the stablecoin economy.
Different roles in the chip ecosystem: AMAT is a materials-engineering and deposition leader, while KLAC dominates process control, inspection, and yield management. Momentum favors AMAT: AMAT shares have more than doubled this year, while KLAC has recently pulled back roughly 9% in a month on margin and execution concerns.
CONY vs MSTY: Weighing YieldMax's Crypto-Linked Option Income ETFs