GET DAILY SIGNALSCONY vs MSTY: Weighing YieldMax's Crypto-Linked Option Income ETFs
Key Takeaways
- Both CONY and MSTY are actively managed, single-stock "derivative income" ETFs from YieldMax that use a synthetic covered call strategy to pursue current income with capped upside.
- CONY is tied to the share price of COIN (Coinbase Global), while MSTY is tied to MSTR (MicroStrategy, now operating as "Strategy"), giving them different crypto-adjacent exposure profiles.
- Both funds are non-diversified and highly concentrated, with the bulk of assets held in U.S. Treasury securities used as options collateral rather than in the underlying stocks themselves.
- Expense ratios are nearly identical, at 1.04% for CONY and 1.03% for MSTY, and both funds are structurally geared toward income rather than capital appreciation.
- MSTY carries materially higher volatility risk because MSTR operates as a leveraged proxy for Bitcoin, whereas CONY's exposure reflects a crypto exchange operator.
Why These Two ETFs Draw Attention
CONY and MSTY are frequently compared because they belong to the same fast-growing product family: YieldMax's suite of option-income ETFs. The two funds do not directly compete for identical exposure, but they serve a similar investor goal — generating high current income from the volatility of a single, crypto-linked stock while accepting a cap on upside gains. For income-oriented investors deciding between the two, the structural differences matter: CONY derives its strategy from Coinbase Global, a cryptocurrency exchange platform, while MSTY is built around MicroStrategy, a company whose balance sheet is dominated by Bitcoin holdings. This ETF comparison clarifies how sector exposure, fund performance, and relative positioning diverge despite a shared engine.
Diving Into CONY
CONY seeks current income with a secondary objective of gaining exposure to the share price of Coinbase Global (COIN), subject to a limit on potential gains. Launched in August 2023, it is an actively managed, non-diversified fund that employs a synthetic covered call strategy — meaning it does not hold COIN shares directly but instead buys call options and sells put options to replicate exposure, then sells short-term call options against that synthetic position to generate premium income. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the holdings compare to peers in the category.
The portfolio is typically concentrated in roughly 25 holdings. Its top positions are overwhelmingly U.S. Treasury bills and notes, which serve as collateral for the options overlay, alongside COIN call options and a government money-market fund. Net expense ratio is 1.04%, which is elevated relative to conventional index ETFs but typical for this specialized derivative-income category. Distributions are generally declared on a monthly basis and can fluctuate significantly with options premium levels.
Understanding MSTY
MSTY pursues the same objective as CONY but is tied to the share price of MicroStrategy (MSTR), now operating as "Strategy," subject to a cap on gains. Launched in February 2024, it is also an actively managed, non-diversified fund using an identical synthetic covered call framework: synthetic long exposure to MSTR, short call options sold for income, and U.S. Treasuries held as collateral.
MSTY holds roughly 20 positions, with U.S. Treasury bills and notes again dominating the top of the list, followed by MSTR call options and a government money-market fund. Its net expense ratio is 1.03%, marginally below CONY. Like CONY, MSTY distributes income regularly and is designed for investors prioritizing current income over full participation in the underlying stock's upside. The key differentiator is the nature of the underlying company: MSTR's equity behaves more like a leveraged Bitcoin vehicle than a conventional operating business.
The Broader Market Context
Both funds sit at the intersection of the crypto/digital-asset theme and the options-income segment. Recent market cycles have been shaped by Bitcoin's price action, the growth of spot Bitcoin exchange-traded products, evolving U.S. regulatory posture toward digital assets, and shifts in interest-rate expectations. Higher short-term Treasury yields have supported the collateral income component of these strategies, while crypto volatility has boosted options premiums. At the same time, this environment has produced sharp drawdowns: because covered call strategies retain most of the downside of the underlying stock while capping upside, both funds can decline substantially during crypto selloffs even as they distribute income.
How Performance and Positioning Compare
In recent weeks and across recent market cycles, MSTY has exhibited greater volatility than CONY, reflecting MSTR's status as a high-beta, Bitcoin-linked treasury company versus COIN's role as an exchange operator with more diversified revenue lines. Both funds have generated elevated distribution yields, but both have also experienced significant price depreciation on a total-return basis in the recent period, consistent with the asymmetric payoff of synthetic covered call strategies during market downturns. Fund performance here is best understood as a function of each underlying stock's earnings cycle and crypto exposure: COIN's results track trading volumes and platform activity, while MSTR's value hinges heavily on Bitcoin prices and its accumulation strategy. Investors weighing relative positioning should recognize that MSTY offers more amplified crypto sensitivity, whereas CONY provides comparatively broader, though still concentrated, exposure to the digital-asset economy.
Forward-Looking Assessment
On a forward-looking, probabilistic basis, Tickeron's AI would likely favor CONY for investors seeking comparatively less extreme volatility within the options-income crypto theme. While MSTY has historically delivered higher income and stronger momentum during Bitcoin rallies, its underlying (MSTR) behaves as a leveraged Bitcoin proxy, exposing shareholders to outsized drawdown risk that can erode total return even when distributions are high. CONY's underlying (COIN) is still volatile but has a more diversified operating business, and its expense ratio difference (1.04% versus 1.03%) is negligible. The AI's preference therefore hinges on risk-adjusted structural strength rather than yield alone, favoring CONY's comparatively balanced risk profile in the current market environment.
Using Tickeron Tools for ETF Analysis
One tool I turn to regularly when comparing specialized ETFs like these is Tickeron's AI Screener. It allows filtering by technical patterns, fundamentals, volatility, and performance metrics to quickly surface relevant ideas and compare holdings across similar strategies. This helps streamline research without manual effort, especially when evaluating concentrated option-income products in fast-moving themes like crypto.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Contributor
I’m a trader and independent researcher. My interest lies at the intersection of financial markets, algorithms, and capital management. I develop data-driven tools and strategies and study algorithmic approaches to market analysis. I help turn complex market data into clear insights and practical systems. I believe technology should support, not replace, investment thinking
Momentum Indicator for CONY turns negative, indicating new downward trend
CONY saw its Momentum Indicator move below the 0 level on October 22, 2026. This is an indication that the stock could be shifting in to a new downward move. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 52 similar instances where the indicator turned negative. In 48 of the 52 cases, the stock moved further down in the following days. The odds of a decline are at 90%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bearish Trend Analysis
CONY moved below its 50-day moving average on October 22, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
The 10-day moving average for CONY crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on October 20, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 6 of 7 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 86%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where CONY declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.
The Aroon Indicator for CONY entered a downward trend on November 11, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Bullish Trend Analysis
The RSI Oscillator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where CONY's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, 27 of 28 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.
The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 12 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.
Following a +8.26% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where CONY advanced for three days, in 179 of 194 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.
CONY may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
Industry description
Advertisement
Advertisement