Deep Fission develops the Gravity™ Reactor, a 15-megawatt small modular pressurized water reactor designed to be installed roughly one mile underground in a borehole. Based in Berkeley, California, the company aims to simplify construction and enhance safety by eliminating large above-ground containment structures, combining mature pressurized water reactor technology with oil-and-gas drilling and geothermal techniques. Deep Fission completed its initial public offering in June 2026 and was selected for the U.S. Department of Energy's Reactor Pilot Program. Its first project is under development in Parsons, Kansas, and the company cites letters of intent covering more than 18.5 gigawatts of potential demand from data centers, industrial parks, and other developers. Investors follow the stock for its potential role in supplying baseload power to energy-intensive AI and data-center buildouts, although the company remains pre-revenue with commercial deployment expected later this decade. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the stock compares to others in the industry.
Over the last 30 days, shares declined from a closing price of about $5.25 on September 29, 2026 to roughly $3.31 on October 28, 2026, a drop of approximately 37%. The move was not linear: the stock briefly spiked above $8 in mid-September before reversing sharply as selling pressure accelerated. The trailing quarter tells a steeper story, with the stock falling from around $9.70 in late July to about $3.31, a decline of roughly 66%, and trading well below its July peak above $12.
The dominant catalyst was a September 24, 2026 report from Iceberg Research that labeled Deep Fission a "money pit." The report argued the company had overstated the competitiveness of its levelized cost of energy, questioned the proposed Nuclear Regulatory Commission approval timeline, and cast doubt on its customer pipeline. The stock dropped roughly 11% immediately after publication and continued sliding in the weeks that followed. Deep Fission responded that the report contained "numerous distortions, inaccuracies and mischaracterizations" and noted the author's disclosed short position. Despite bullish analyst coverage—including a Buy rating and $18 price target from Roth Capital Partners and a Buy initiation from Maxim Group—the short-seller narrative outweighed positive commentary. On October 20, the company announced a binding 25-year Master Energy Purchase Agreement with the Great Plains Development Authority covering an initial phase of up to 150 MW, but ongoing securities investigations announced by multiple law firms kept sentiment under pressure.
The broader quarterly decline reflects the challenges facing a pre-revenue, capital-intensive nuclear developer. After its June 2026 IPO, the stock gave back its early gains as investors reassessed execution and funding risks. Deep Fission expects negative adjusted EBITDA through at least 2027 and does not anticipate meaningful revenue until late 2027 or 2028, leaving the company dependent on continued financing. Regulatory and drilling milestones—including the Parsons, Kansas facility and a planned full-size borehole—remain uncertain. The September short-seller report crystallized these concerns, accelerating a retreat that had already been underway through the summer.
Several factors are likely to shape Deep Fission's outlook. Regulatory progress with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the Department of Energy remains central, as does the planned drilling of a full-size borehole at the Parsons site. Investors will monitor execution on the October 2026 Master Energy Purchase Agreement, which is subject to regulatory approvals and carries no minimum purchase obligation. Funding and cash runway are critical given the company's pre-revenue status and projected negative EBITDA, while litigation and securities investigations could influence sentiment. Finally, the stock's valuation will depend on whether the company can translate its letters of intent into binding commercial agreements and demonstrate progress toward its 2027 commissioning target. From what I see, these milestones will be key inflection points.
In my own analysis, I often turn to Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page to review curated AI-driven trading bots that cover thousands of tickers. The section highlights top-performing bots across strategies and timeframes, offering a data-driven way to complement manual research on names like FISN. It helps match approaches to different risk preferences without replacing core fundamental work.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Sergey Savastiouk, Ph.D. has a degree in Applied Mathematics from Moscow University and has extensive experience as an entrepreneur, investor, manager, and mathematician. His professional expertise is in applied mathematics, mathematical modeling, system and pattern analysis, and software and hardware system integration. He has served as the CEO of several hi-tech start-up companies and nonprofit organizations, which has given him proven capabilities in business strategy for high-tech start-up companies, market assessment, company formation, team building, product development, marketing, and sales. He has published numerous articles in journals and magazines on related fields. As a retail investor, he spent 15 years developing his proprietary trading and quantitative algorithms (now Tickeron’s A.I.), which brought him significant returns in trading the stock market. His current work and goal in founding Tickeron is to bring professional, sophisticated stock market analysis capabilities to retail investors via an easy-to-use interface.
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Industry IndustrialMachinery