Investors comparing income-oriented REITs often weigh dividend safety, growth trajectory, and price momentum together, since a high yield can quickly be offset by share-price weakness. EPR (EPR Properties), GTY (Getty Realty Corp.), and NNN (NNN REIT, Inc.) are three distinct net-lease REITs that appeal to different segments of the market: one tied to experiential leisure, one to convenience and automotive retail, and one to a broad single-tenant retail base. This stock comparison examines their recent performance, growth drivers, and relative market positioning to help traders and investors evaluate which name currently holds the strongest hand. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the stocks compare to others in the industry.
EPR is a diversified experiential net-lease REIT that owns and finances properties such as theatres, "eat-and-play" venues, attractions, ski resorts, and fitness-and-wellness assets, alongside a smaller education segment. Its portfolio totals roughly $7.0 billion across 333 properties, with the experiential segment representing about 94% of investments and the overall portfolio roughly 99% leased or operated.
In recent weeks, EPR has drawn attention for solid fundamentals rather than a sharp share-price breakout. Full-year funds from operations (FFO), a key REIT earnings measure that adds back depreciation and amortization, rose to $5.12 per share, while adjusted FFO (AFFO), which further adjusts for recurring capital costs, reached $5.14. Management raised its monthly dividend by 5.1% and guided 2026 FFO to $5.28–$5.48 per share. Sentiment, however, remains tied to discretionary consumer spending and the theater industry, making EPR's performance more cyclical than its peers' despite improving results. From what I see, this growth profile stands out but requires close monitoring of consumer trends.
GTY (Getty Realty Corp.) is a net-lease REIT focused on convenience stores, automotive service centers, car washes, and quick-service restaurants. Its portfolio included 1,174 freestanding properties across 44 states and Washington, D.C. as of year-end, and the company invested $268.8 million in 2025 at a roughly 7.9% initial cash yield.
Recent market activity has favored GTY. The stock has traded near its 52-week high, with a year-to-date return exceeding 20%, supported by lease extensions covering about 5% of annual base rent that lifted the portfolio's weighted average lease term to 10.4 years and sharply reduced near-term lease expirations. GTY has raised its dividend for nine consecutive years and maintained payments for more than three decades. This combination of momentum and improved income visibility has made GTY a relative standout within the group, though its smaller market capitalization can amplify volatility. One thing that stands out here is the defensive tenant mix.
NNN (NNN REIT, Inc., formerly National Retail Properties) is one of the largest and most established net-lease REITs, owning thousands of single-tenant retail properties across 50 states, generally under long-term triple-net leases where tenants cover taxes, insurance, and maintenance. It is best known for raising its dividend for 36 consecutive years.
Recent weeks have presented a more mixed picture for NNN. The company completed a record of over $900 million in 2025 acquisitions at a roughly 7.4% capitalization rate (the initial yield on property investments) and reported occupancy recovery to 98.3%. However, full-year impairment charges jumped sharply year over year, signaling tenant-credit stress in parts of the retail base, and same-store rental growth has remained modest. The stock's recent performance has lagged, with interest-coverage concerns weighing on sentiment even as the dividend yield remains attractive near the mid-5% range. I'm watching this closely given the scale advantage.
The three REITs diverge most sharply on business mix and risk profile. EPR offers the highest growth ambition, with 2026 investment guidance of $400–$500 million and above-average per-share earnings expansion, but its dependence on discretionary experiences and theaters makes it more sensitive to consumer cycles. GTY sits in the middle on growth and defensive qualities, anchored by necessity-based convenience and automotive retail tenants, and currently enjoys the strongest price momentum and lease-term stability. NNN provides the greatest scale and the longest dividend-growth history, but its slower acquisition-driven growth, higher impairment activity, and tighter interest coverage make it the least dynamic of the three on a forward basis.
On valuation sensitivity, all three respond to interest-rate expectations, since REITs rely on external capital. Yet NNN's larger debt-funded acquisition program and rising impairment trend make it comparatively more exposed to financing costs, while GTY's longer weighted average lease term and reduced near-term expirations improve its cash-flow predictability relative to peers. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Trend Prediction Engine to gauge forward momentum signals.
In my research process, I often turn to Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots to review automated strategies across names like these REITs. The section highlights top-performing bots with different styles and timeframes, which can offer additional perspective on current market conditions without replacing individual analysis. It is a useful way to monitor machine-driven signals alongside traditional fundamentals.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
The 10-day moving average for EPR crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on November 03, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 11 of 14 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 79%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 20, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on EPR as a result. In 52 of 76 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 68%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for EPR just turned positive on October 15, 2026. Looking at past instances where EPR's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 21 of 39 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 54%.
EPR moved above its 50-day moving average on October 29, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
Following a +2.07% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where EPR advanced for three days, in 212 of 336 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 63%.
The RSI Indicator demonstrated that the stock has entered the overbought zone. This may point to a price pull-back soon.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 4 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where EPR declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 55%.
EPR broke above its upper Bollinger Band on November 04, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for EPR entered a downward trend on October 19, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 26 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 78, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 45 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. EPR’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 66 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 69 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly better than average sales and a considerably profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 77 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (2.015) is normal, around the industry mean (1.787). P/E Ratio (19.344) is within average values for comparable stocks, (28.425). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.620) is also within normal values, averaging (2.612). Dividend Yield (0.020) settles around the average of (0.043) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (6.258) is also within normal values, averaging (5.594).
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
a real estate investment trust
Industry SpecialtyTelecommunications