FedEx Freight Holding Company is North America's largest less-than-truckload carrier, moving freight that does not require a full trailer. The company began trading independently on the New York Stock Exchange on June 1, 2026, after separating from FedEx, and shifted to a calendar-year fiscal period. This third-quarter report, covering the three months ended September 30, 2026, marks its first full quarter as a standalone public company. Investors are watching closely to see whether FDXF can maintain pricing power, stabilize volumes, and manage the one-time costs of the spinoff.
For the third quarter of 2026, FedEx Freight reported adjusted earnings of $1.49 per share, beating the LSEG consensus of $1.36 per share. That figure was down from $2.10 per share in the same quarter a year earlier, with management pointing mainly to separation costs and higher fuel prices as the reasons.
Revenue increased 8% year over year to $2.44 billion, ahead of the $2.37 billion expected. The gain came from improved yields and stronger fuel surcharges, even though shipment volumes stayed relatively soft. Revenue per shipment rose as the company focused on higher-margin freight. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how FDXF stacks up against other transportation names.
Looking ahead, management guided fourth-quarter adjusted EPS between $0.65 and $0.75 per share, above the $0.53 analysts had modeled. Revenue for the seven months ending in December is expected in the $5.58 billion to $5.65 billion range, implying 4% to 6% growth from a year earlier.
Shares of FDXF rose roughly 2.1% in extended trading after the release. The earnings beat and solid fourth-quarter outlook outweighed the year-over-year profit drop, reflecting optimism that pricing discipline and stabilizing volumes can offset near-term headwinds from separation costs and fuel. Sentiment stays measured, however, given ongoing pressure on industrial demand and the broader LTL sector.
The guidance suggests management anticipates gradual volume recovery while pricing remains firm. The fourth-quarter EPS range of $0.65 to $0.75 implies sequential improvement in profitability, even with ongoing transition costs.
Several items deserve attention in coming quarters. Fuel prices and surcharges will be important, as higher costs can lift revenue through surcharges but may squeeze margins if not fully recovered. Freight volumes and industrial demand will show whether pricing gains translate into lasting earnings growth. The pace of separation-related spending is also worth tracking, with costs expected to remain elevated over the next 12 to 18 months. Finally, the shift toward higher-margin areas such as healthcare freight could support longer-term profitability.
One resource I turn to when analyzing names like FDXF is Tickeron’s AI Screener. It helps filter stocks by technical patterns, fundamentals, and industry trends, making it easier to compare peers and spot opportunities in the LTL space without manual effort. The tool has become a regular part of my review process for sector-specific ideas.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Sergey Savastiouk, Ph.D. has a degree in Applied Mathematics from Moscow University and has extensive experience as an entrepreneur, investor, manager, and mathematician. His professional expertise is in applied mathematics, mathematical modeling, system and pattern analysis, and software and hardware system integration. He has served as the CEO of several hi-tech start-up companies and nonprofit organizations, which has given him proven capabilities in business strategy for high-tech start-up companies, market assessment, company formation, team building, product development, marketing, and sales. He has published numerous articles in journals and magazines on related fields. As a retail investor, he spent 15 years developing his proprietary trading and quantitative algorithms (now Tickeron’s A.I.), which brought him significant returns in trading the stock market. His current work and goal in founding Tickeron is to bring professional, sophisticated stock market analysis capabilities to retail investors via an easy-to-use interface.
The Stochastic Oscillator for FDXF moved out of overbought territory on October 13, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock and investors may want to consider selling or taking a defensive position. A.I.dvisor looked at 2 similar instances where the indicator exited the overbought zone. In 2 of the 2 cases the stock moved lower. This puts the odds of a downward move at 90%.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 19, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on FDXF as a result. In 5 of 5 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where FDXF declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.
The Aroon Indicator for FDXF entered a downward trend on October 23, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for FDXF just turned positive on October 06, 2026. Looking at past instances where FDXF's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 1 of 2 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 50%.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 69 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 70 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. FDXF’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 74 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (5.924) is normal, around the industry mean (2.559). FDXF has a moderately high P/E Ratio (25.633) as compared to the industry average of (7.377). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (5.110). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.019) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (2.069) is also within normal values, averaging (2.034).
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. FDXF’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 89, placing this stock worse than average.
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Industry OtherTransportation