First BanCorp serves as the largest financial institution in Puerto Rico and operates as a regional lender in the U.S. Virgin Islands and Florida. Its results offer insight into the Puerto Rico economy, which management characterized as resilient amid reconstruction efforts, stable employment levels, and manufacturing reshoring trends. For investors, the report highlights how the bank is managing a higher-rate environment where deposit costs are pressuring its traditionally robust net interest margin. The quarter also reflects management's conviction through increased returns of capital to shareholders even as top-line revenue showed some softness.
First BanCorp posted net income of $96.1 million, or $0.63 per diluted share, for the quarter ended September 30, 2026, essentially unchanged from the second quarter. Diluted EPS exceeded the analyst consensus of $0.59, aided in part by continued share repurchases. Total revenue of $260.1 million missed expectations, pointing to a softer revenue picture.
Net interest income fell by about $1.6 million sequentially to $227.5 million, reflecting higher funding costs and the lack of roughly $3.4 million in one-time benefits from the prior quarter. Net interest margin declined to 4.73% from 4.87%, though it remained 16 basis points above the year-ago level. Non-interest income dropped $3.1 million to $32.6 million, while non-interest expenses increased $2.9 million to $130.2 million, driven largely by a $2.8 million contingency reserve related to an adverse court ruling on a commercial property in the U.S. Virgin Islands.
Credit quality stayed stable overall. The non-performing assets ratio remained at 0.59%, and annualized net charge-offs rose to 55 basis points of average loans, primarily from consumer and auto-related losses. Return on average assets reached 1.98%, marking the 19th straight quarter above 1.5%.
From what I see, checking comparable names with Tickeron’s AI Screener helped put these margin and efficiency figures in broader industry context.
The market reaction to the third-quarter results was subdued and mixed. The EPS beat and the larger dividend plus buyback announcement were viewed positively, yet the revenue shortfall and sequential net interest margin decline limited enthusiasm. With the stock already near the upper end of its 52-week range following a solid year-to-date advance, investors appeared cautious about adding to positions on a report that included top-line weakness. Pre-report focus had centered on margin durability and capital deployment, and the outcome delivered a combination of reassurance and caution that kept trading measured.
Management anticipates that the core net interest margin will hold near current levels in the fourth quarter, as continued deposit competition and funding-cost pressure are offset by floating-rate loan repricing and reinvestment of maturing securities at higher yields. Executives also reaffirmed their confidence in achieving the lower end of the 3% to 5% full-year loan growth target.
Capital returns remain a key focus. The board’s 25% dividend increase and expanded $350 million buyback authorization underscore confidence in earnings power, with management expecting to complete roughly $50 million in repurchases during the fourth quarter. Investors will want to monitor whether these programs can continue without reducing the bank’s sizable capital buffer.
Important items to watch include the path of deposit costs amid competition from credit unions and peers, consumer and auto credit trends following the rise in charge-offs, and the broader interest-rate outlook for 2027, which management plans to discuss in more detail on the next earnings call. Puerto Rico’s economic resilience, especially reconstruction spending and reshoring activity, will continue to influence loan demand in coming quarters.
In my analysis of regional banks, I often rely on Tickeron’s AI Screener to quickly scan for peers with similar margin profiles and capital metrics. It helps surface comparable opportunities without manual filtering and supports more informed comparisons across the financial sector. The tool has become a regular part of my process when evaluating names like FBP.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Sergey Savastiouk, Ph.D. has a degree in Applied Mathematics from Moscow University and has extensive experience as an entrepreneur, investor, manager, and mathematician. His professional expertise is in applied mathematics, mathematical modeling, system and pattern analysis, and software and hardware system integration. He has served as the CEO of several hi-tech start-up companies and nonprofit organizations, which has given him proven capabilities in business strategy for high-tech start-up companies, market assessment, company formation, team building, product development, marketing, and sales. He has published numerous articles in journals and magazines on related fields. As a retail investor, he spent 15 years developing his proprietary trading and quantitative algorithms (now Tickeron’s A.I.), which brought him significant returns in trading the stock market. His current work and goal in founding Tickeron is to bring professional, sophisticated stock market analysis capabilities to retail investors via an easy-to-use interface.
The RSI Indicator for FBP moved out of oversold territory on October 01, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 18 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 14 of the 18 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 78%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 13, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on FBP as a result. In 59 of 83 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 71%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for FBP just turned positive on October 09, 2026. Looking at past instances where FBP's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 31 of 41 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 76%.
Following a +2.51% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where FBP advanced for three days, in 209 of 320 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 65%.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 3 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
FBP moved below its 50-day moving average on September 16, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where FBP declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 57%.
FBP broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 20, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for FBP entered a downward trend on October 12, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 5 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 57, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 12 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 35 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to consistent earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 45 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. FBP’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 80 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: FBP's P/B Ratio (2.111) is slightly higher than the industry average of (1.246). P/E Ratio (11.439) is within average values for comparable stocks, (13.217). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.120) is also within normal values, averaging (1.190). Dividend Yield (0.029) settles around the average of (0.035) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (4.396) is also within normal values, averaging (3.738).
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
a regional bank
Industry RegionalBanks