Franklin Resources, operating as Franklin Templeton, ranks among the world's largest independent asset managers. Its quarterly results provide a useful snapshot of conditions in active investment management. The fiscal fourth quarter ended September 30, 2026, concluded a year in which the firm emphasized private markets and alternatives to counter ongoing pressure on traditional active strategies. For investors, the report matters because it shows whether the company's multi-year shift into alternatives, ETFs, and separately managed accounts is supporting higher earnings, and whether fee trends and AUM momentum can sustain the profitability recovery now underway. I also checked this using Tickeron's AI Screener to see how the stock compares to others in the industry.
Franklin Resources delivered a strong finish to fiscal 2026. Adjusted EPS came in at $0.94, exceeding the FactSet consensus of $0.77, while GAAP diluted EPS of $0.72 compared with $0.21 in the prior-year quarter. Net income attributable to the company rose to $380.1 million from $117.6 million a year earlier.
Total revenue increased to $2.43 billion from $2.34 billion in the same period last year. For the full fiscal year, revenue reached $9.42 billion, up from $8.77 billion, with full-year net income of $1.08 billion and diluted EPS of $1.97 versus $0.91 a year ago.
The results were underpinned by momentum in alternatives, where AUM reached a record $305 billion and the firm raised $48.7 billion across Alternatives in fiscal 2026. Citing that strength, management raised its fiscal 2029 private markets fundraising target to $150 billion from $100 billion.
Shares of BEN moved higher following the November 6 release, reflecting a beat on both the top and bottom lines and an upbeat narrative around alternatives growth. The stock had already been on an upward trajectory, and the raised fiscal 2029 targets reinforced confidence in the company's strategic direction. Investor sentiment was buoyed by record alternatives AUM, strong private markets fundraising, and improved profitability, though attention remains on whether fee-rate trends and broader market conditions can sustain the momentum into the new fiscal year.
Looking ahead, investors should watch how Franklin Resources converts its record alternatives AUM into durable, higher-margin revenue. The raised fiscal 2029 targets for private markets fundraising, ETFs, Canvas, and adjusted operating margin set a more ambitious bar, and management's execution against these goals will be closely scrutinized in coming quarters.
Fee rates and organic flows in traditional active strategies remain key swing factors. While alternatives and wealth-channel distribution have shown strength, any slowdown in institutional demand or market-driven AUM declines could pressure revenue. The company's continued expansion through acquisitions in alternative credit and real estate also adds integration and execution considerations.
Finally, cost discipline and operating margin trends will be important. The firm has worked to rationalize its product lineup, and investors will look for evidence that efficiency gains and revenue growth translate into sustained earnings improvement without eroding the competitive advantages of its diversified global franchise. From what I see, one factor worth monitoring closely is how the raised targets play out in practice.
In preparing this review, I turned to Tickeron's AI Trading Bots to test how automated strategies might respond to similar earnings patterns and AUM trends. The platform lets users explore virtual agents across different market conditions, which helped me frame the potential durability of the alternatives-driven rebound in a more systematic way.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Sergey Savastiouk, Ph.D. has a degree in Applied Mathematics from Moscow University and has extensive experience as an entrepreneur, investor, manager, and mathematician. His professional expertise is in applied mathematics, mathematical modeling, system and pattern analysis, and software and hardware system integration. He has served as the CEO of several hi-tech start-up companies and nonprofit organizations, which has given him proven capabilities in business strategy for high-tech start-up companies, market assessment, company formation, team building, product development, marketing, and sales. He has published numerous articles in journals and magazines on related fields. As a retail investor, he spent 15 years developing his proprietary trading and quantitative algorithms (now Tickeron’s A.I.), which brought him significant returns in trading the stock market. His current work and goal in founding Tickeron is to bring professional, sophisticated stock market analysis capabilities to retail investors via an easy-to-use interface.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for BEN turned positive on October 27, 2026. Looking at past instances where BEN's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 31 of 46 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 67%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 27, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on BEN as a result. In 56 of 89 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 63%.
BEN moved above its 50-day moving average on November 06, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
Following a +5.94% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where BEN advanced for three days, in 200 of 320 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 62%.
The 10-day RSI Indicator for BEN moved out of overbought territory on November 05, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 32 similar instances where the indicator moved out of overbought territory. In 19 of the 32 cases, the stock moved lower in the following days. This puts the odds of a move lower at 59%.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 6 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where BEN declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 71%.
BEN broke above its upper Bollinger Band on November 06, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for BEN entered a downward trend on October 26, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 45 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. BEN’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 54 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 80, placing this stock slightly better than average.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 80 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.460) is normal, around the industry mean (2.444). P/E Ratio (22.946) is within average values for comparable stocks, (-2.345). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.407) is also within normal values, averaging (1.319). Dividend Yield (0.039) settles around the average of (0.269) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (1.814) is also within normal values, averaging (15.694).
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 80 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 91 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
a provider of investment management, marketing and administration services to investment companies
Industry InvestmentManagers