Garrett Motion serves as a global supplier of turbocharging and electrification technologies for automotive and industrial applications. Its quarterly results provide insight into how the company is handling a softer light-vehicle market, especially in China, while shifting toward faster-growing areas like power generation and zero-emission technologies. The third-quarter report also tests whether the strategy of increasing the mix toward commercial vehicles, industrial products, and aftermarket sales can offset weakness in gasoline turbochargers and support margin growth. With capital returns through buybacks and dividends in place, I am watching both profitability and cash generation closely.
Garrett Motion reported third-quarter 2026 net sales of $930 million, a 3% increase on both a reported and constant-currency basis from $902 million in the prior-year period. Net income rose to $97 million from $77 million a year earlier, translating to diluted EPS of $0.51 versus $0.38. Adjusted EBIT increased to $152 million, and the adjusted EBIT margin expanded 160 basis points to 16.3%, driven primarily by favorable product mix. Adjusted free cash flow was $136 million, up from $107 million in the third quarter of 2025.
Compared with expectations, revenue was essentially in line with consensus of about $930 million, while GAAP EPS of $0.51 beat analyst estimates of roughly $0.42 by more than 20%. The company reaffirmed its full-year 2026 midpoint outlook for all metrics, including net sales of $3.75 billion to $3.85 billion and adjusted free cash flow of $410 million to $450 million. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the stock compares to others in the industry.
Shares of Garrett Motion (GTX) held relatively steady immediately following the report, with investors appearing to weigh the solid EPS beat and improving margins against revenue that was only in line with expectations. Sentiment around the name has been supported by the company’s consistent execution, disciplined capital returns, and expanding industrial business, but tempered by broader concerns over light-vehicle production declines and foreign exchange headwinds. The announcement of a new $250 million buyback authorization and a reaffirmed full-year outlook signaled management confidence, even as tariff pass-throughs and currency effects continued to pressure reported growth.
Garrett Motion reaffirmed its full-year 2026 midpoint guidance, offsetting stronger operational performance against unfavorable foreign exchange, particularly in the fourth quarter. Investors will be watching whether the company can sustain its margin expansion as industrial and commercial-vehicle sales grow as a share of the mix.
A key area of focus is the industrial segment, where management now expects roughly $230 million in sales this year and about $300 million in 2027, driven largely by power-generation (genset) demand. The ramp-up of E-Cooling compressors and a new award with Multistack are important milestones, though the company has cautioned that contract sizing remains fluid as the technology gains adoption.
Additional factors to monitor include light-vehicle production trends in China, tariff pass-through impacts, commodity and energy costs, and research and development spending as Garrett advances its zero-emission technologies. The company’s balance-sheet strength, including voluntary debt repayments and a reduced net leverage ratio, provides flexibility, but currency swings and end-market demand remain the primary swing factors for results in the quarters ahead. From what I see, the AI Pattern Search Engine helped confirm some of these industrial trends in related names.
In my research process, I frequently turn to Tickeron’s AI Screener to filter stocks by fundamentals, technical patterns, and AI-driven signals. This tool helps narrow down opportunities in sectors like industrials more efficiently, allowing me to compare names such as GTX against peers and spot potential breakout candidates based on customizable criteria. It has become a practical part of evaluating earnings reports and forward outlooks without relying solely on manual review.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Sergey Savastiouk, Ph.D. has a degree in Applied Mathematics from Moscow University and has extensive experience as an entrepreneur, investor, manager, and mathematician. His professional expertise is in applied mathematics, mathematical modeling, system and pattern analysis, and software and hardware system integration. He has served as the CEO of several hi-tech start-up companies and nonprofit organizations, which has given him proven capabilities in business strategy for high-tech start-up companies, market assessment, company formation, team building, product development, marketing, and sales. He has published numerous articles in journals and magazines on related fields. As a retail investor, he spent 15 years developing his proprietary trading and quantitative algorithms (now Tickeron’s A.I.), which brought him significant returns in trading the stock market. His current work and goal in founding Tickeron is to bring professional, sophisticated stock market analysis capabilities to retail investors via an easy-to-use interface.
The RSI Oscillator for GTX moved out of oversold territory on October 28, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 26 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 23 of the 26 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 88%.
The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 10 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.
Following a +2.95% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where GTX advanced for three days, in 208 of 306 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 68%.
GTX may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 12, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on GTX as a result. In 58 of 84 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 69%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for GTX turned negative on October 15, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 46 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 36 of the 46 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 78%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where GTX declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 67%.
The Aroon Indicator for GTX entered a downward trend on September 23, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 5 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is seriously undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (-6.169) is normal, around the industry mean (0.879). P/E Ratio (12.005) is within average values for comparable stocks, (40.427). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (1.471). Dividend Yield (0.014) settles around the average of (0.040) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (1.368) is also within normal values, averaging (48.609).
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 30 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 43 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 89, placing this stock slightly better than average.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 62 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. GTX’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 85 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Industry AutoPartsOEM