GET DAILY SIGNALSGDX, SIL, and SLVP: Weighing the Differences Among Precious Metals Miners ETFs
Key Takeaways
- All three funds are passively managed, metals-focused exchange-traded funds (ETFs), but they occupy distinct niches: GDX is gold-dominant, while SIL and SLVP are silver-centric.
- GDX offers the deepest diversification with roughly 55–60 holdings and the largest liquidity pool, whereas SLVP is the most concentrated and smallest in assets under management (AUM).
- On cost, SLVP is the most efficient at a 0.39% expense ratio, followed by GDX at 0.51% and SIL at 0.65%.
- Single-name concentration varies sharply: Wheaton Precious Metals alone can exceed 20% of SIL, while GDX spreads risk more evenly across large-cap gold producers.
- Volatility profiles are tiered, with silver-leveraged funds typically showing higher drawdowns and beta than gold-focused GDX.
- Tickeron AI Verdict: Based on structural strength, liquidity, diversification depth, and cost efficiency, the AI would most likely favor GDX among the three.
Why These Funds Are Worth Comparing
Precious-metals miners have attracted fresh interest lately as investors consider shifts in monetary policy, inflation protection, and growing industrial uses for silver. GDX, SIL, and SLVP all sit within the broader precious-metals mining space, yet they are not interchangeable. GDX follows a gold-oriented index that still includes some silver exposure, while SIL and SLVP focus specifically on silver miners through different index approaches. Placing them side by side highlights how exposure, concentration, fees, and fund design can lead to noticeably different risk and return outcomes even inside the same theme. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the funds line up against broader industry peers.
VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) at a Glance
GDX is a passively managed ETF that aims to match the price and yield performance of a global gold-miners index. The portfolio contains roughly 55–60 equities and leans heavily toward large-cap producers such as Newmont, Agnico Eagle Mines, Barrick Gold, Wheaton Precious Metals, Franco-Nevada, AngloGold Ashanti, Gold Fields, Kinross Gold, and Pan American Silver. Sector exposure sits at essentially 100% materials, with gold mining dominating and silver playing a supporting role. The fund carries a 0.51% expense ratio and follows a modified, float-adjusted market-capitalization weighting that is reviewed on a rules-based schedule. Its large size and strong trading liquidity stand out as key structural advantages.
Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) at a Glance
SIL is a passively managed ETF that tracks a market-cap-weighted index of global silver-mining companies. It holds about 40 holdings, with leading positions in Wheaton Precious Metals, Pan American Silver, Coeur Mining, Hecla Mining, First Majestic Silver, SSR Mining, and Compañía de Minas Buenaventura, plus non-U.S. names such as Fresnillo and Industrias Peñoles. Concentration is significant: the top ten holdings can represent more than three-quarters of assets, and one streaming company may account for over 20%. The fund levies a 0.65% expense ratio, the highest in the group, and applies a per-constituent weighting cap to manage single-name exposure.
iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) at a Glance
SLVP is a passively managed ETF that follows the MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index, focusing on companies with high sensitivity to silver prices. The portfolio usually includes roughly 30–40 names and tilts more toward small- and mid-cap companies than its counterparts. Top holdings feature Hecla Mining, First Majestic Silver, Newmont, Agnico Eagle Mines, Wheaton Precious Metals, Endeavour Silver, and Silvercorp Metals, along with Fresnillo and Industrias Peñoles. It carries the lowest expense ratio of the three at 0.39% and rebalances quarterly with a single-issuer cap. Its more modest AUM and lighter trading volume are important structural factors to consider.
The Broader Industry Context
The precious-metals mining sector is influenced by overlapping macro drivers. Gold miners respond to safe-haven flows, central-bank purchases, and real-interest-rate movements, while silver serves both as a monetary metal and an industrial input linked to solar power and electronics. Regulatory changes in key mining regions, geopolitical risks, and currency shifts all affect producer margins and capital allocation. Cost control and free-cash-flow generation among major miners have strengthened in recent cycles, yet the sector stays exposed to labor, energy, and permitting challenges. These forces touch all three ETFs, though their differing metal exposures and company selections shape how each reacts.
How Performance and Positioning Compare
In recent periods the three funds have generally moved together but with varying intensity. Silver-oriented funds have tended to show higher volatility, larger drawdowns, and greater beta to metal-price changes than gold-focused GDX, reflecting silver’s narrower market and the smaller-cap lean of SIL and SLVP. Concentration also creates divergence: SIL’s large stake in one streaming company can magnify company-specific moves, while SLVP’s smaller-producer tilt adds sensitivity to execution risks. GDX’s wider large-cap gold base has historically delivered steadier trends and lower single-name risk, though it may trail pure-silver funds in strong silver rallies. From what I see, these differences matter most during periods of sharp metal-price swings.
Refining ETF Analysis with AI Tools
I have found Tickeron’s AI Screener helpful when comparing funds like these. It lets me filter across technical patterns, fundamentals, and volatility metrics to quickly spot how GDX, SIL, and SLVP stack up against peers. The tool streamlines the process of scanning for relative strength and risk factors without manual effort.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Momentum Indicator for GDX turns positive, indicating new upward trend
GDX saw its Momentum Indicator move above the 0 level on November 05, 2026. This is an indication that the stock could be shifting in to a new upward move. Traders may want to consider buying the stock or buying call options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 77 similar instances where the indicator turned positive. In 71 of the 77 cases, the stock moved higher in the following days. The odds of a move higher are at 90%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for GDX just turned positive on November 05, 2026. Looking at past instances where GDX's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 45 of 47 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.
Following a +3.56% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where GDX advanced for three days, in 288 of 315 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.
GDX may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator entered the overbought zone. Expect a price pull-back in the foreseeable future.
The 10-day moving average for GDX crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on October 02, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 12 of 12 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.
The 50-day moving average for GDX moved below the 200-day moving average on November 04, 2026. This could be a long-term bearish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where GDX declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 88%.
The Aroon Indicator for GDX entered a downward trend on November 06, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Notable companies
Industry description
Market Cap
High and low price notable news
Volume
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Advertisement
General Information
Category PreciousMetals
Advertisement