Horizon Bancorp, Inc. is a community and regional bank holding company based in Michigan City, Indiana, operating across Indiana and Michigan. Its third quarter 2026 report matters because it marks a full recovery from the prior-year period, when a large investment securities sale loss pushed the company to a net loss. Investors are watching whether the bank can sustain its above-peer profitability metrics and steady deposit growth in a shifting interest-rate environment. The results also offer a read on how disciplined loan and deposit pricing is translating into margin stability, a key concern for regional banks broadly. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the stock compares to others in the industry.
For the three months ended September 30, 2026, Horizon Bancorp reported net income of $28.7 million, or $0.56 per diluted share. That compares with $24.9 million, or $0.49 per diluted share, in the second quarter of 2026, and a net loss of $222.0 million in the prior-year period driven by a large investment securities sale loss.
Net interest income increased to $65.2 million from $63.5 million in the prior quarter, supported by a net interest margin that held at 4.37% on a fully taxable equivalent (FTE) basis, up from 3.52% a year earlier. Non-interest income was $11.9 million, while non-interest expense declined to $41.5 million from $43.8 million, helped by the absence of a prior-quarter legal charge. The efficiency ratio improved to 53.85%, and the effective tax rate fell to 16.4%, aided by a discrete tax benefit.
On the balance sheet, total assets rose 0.3% to $6.6 billion, and total deposits grew 1.5% to $5.5 billion, reflecting continued core deposit gathering. Book value per common share was $13.68, and tangible book value per common share was $10.54. The company declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.16 per share.
Heading into the report, Horizon Bancorp shares had gained roughly 22.8% over the prior 12 months but were down about 2.3% over the last three months, reflecting mixed sentiment around regional banks. The bottom-line earnings beat was tempered by a modest revenue shortfall. Following the release, investors weighed the margin stability and improving efficiency against a slightly lighter revenue figure and a decline in book value per share from $14.21 in the prior quarter. The combination of a smaller-than-expected revenue result and book value pressure could moderate the positive reaction to the EPS beat.
Investors should watch several items in the quarters ahead. First is margin durability, specifically whether the bank can hold the 4.37% FTE net interest margin if the Federal Reserve's rate path shifts. Second is deposit and loan growth; continued core deposit gathering will be important for managing funding costs.
Third is asset quality. Non-performing assets increased during the quarter, so credit trends and the allowance for credit losses bear monitoring. Fourth is capital, where the Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) capital ratio of 11.53% supports the balance sheet, but a decline in tangible book value per share from $11.06 to $10.54 is worth watching.
Finally, the lower effective tax rate benefited from a discrete item that may not recur, so investors should assess the underlying earnings run rate. Management's conference call commentary on the rate outlook and the loan pipeline will shape near-term expectations. From what I see, the AI Pattern Search Engine can help flag potential setups in the sector based on historical patterns.
In my analysis of regional banks, I often rely on Tickeron’s AI Screener to quickly filter peers by fundamentals, technical patterns, and performance metrics. It streamlines the process of identifying comparable names and emerging opportunities without manual effort, which has proven helpful when evaluating names like HBNC alongside broader sector trends.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Sergey Savastiouk, Ph.D. has a degree in Applied Mathematics from Moscow University and has extensive experience as an entrepreneur, investor, manager, and mathematician. His professional expertise is in applied mathematics, mathematical modeling, system and pattern analysis, and software and hardware system integration. He has served as the CEO of several hi-tech start-up companies and nonprofit organizations, which has given him proven capabilities in business strategy for high-tech start-up companies, market assessment, company formation, team building, product development, marketing, and sales. He has published numerous articles in journals and magazines on related fields. As a retail investor, he spent 15 years developing his proprietary trading and quantitative algorithms (now Tickeron’s A.I.), which brought him significant returns in trading the stock market. His current work and goal in founding Tickeron is to bring professional, sophisticated stock market analysis capabilities to retail investors via an easy-to-use interface.
On October 02, 2026, the Stochastic Oscillator for HBNC moved out of oversold territory and this could be a bullish sign for the stock. Traders may want to buy the stock or buy call options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 60 instances where the indicator left the oversold zone. In 43 of the 60 cases the stock moved higher in the following days. This puts the odds of a move higher at over 72%.
The RSI Oscillator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where HBNC's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 15 of 21 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 71%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 20, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on HBNC as a result. In 52 of 80 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 65%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for HBNC just turned positive on October 02, 2026. Looking at past instances where HBNC's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 26 of 45 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 58%.
HBNC moved above its 50-day moving average on October 20, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
Following a +2.48% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where HBNC advanced for three days, in 195 of 305 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 64%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where HBNC declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 67%.
HBNC broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 20, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for HBNC entered a downward trend on October 12, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 1 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is seriously undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.386) is normal, around the industry mean (1.241). P/E Ratio (-6.012) is within average values for comparable stocks, (13.089). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.280) is also within normal values, averaging (1.190). Dividend Yield (0.033) settles around the average of (0.036) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (3.319) is also within normal values, averaging (3.738).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 45 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. HBNC’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 67 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 68 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. HBNC’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 56, placing this stock worse than average.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 98 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
a regional bank
Industry RegionalBanks