As one of the world's largest technology distributors, Ingram Micro sits at the center of the IT supply chain, connecting hardware, software, and cloud vendors with resellers and managed service providers across North America, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, Asia-Pacific, and Latin America. Its quarterly results serve as a closely watched barometer of global technology demand. Coming off a strong first half in which revenue consistently grew by double digits, the fiscal third quarter was a key test of whether momentum in cloud and AI infrastructure could be sustained. For investors, the report also offered fresh evidence on margin discipline, cash generation, and the company's ability to convert the strategic investments outlined at its September Capital Markets Day into tangible financial performance. I also checked this using Tickeron's AI Screener to see how the stock compares to others in the industry.
Ingram Micro delivered a record fiscal third quarter for the period ended September 26, 2026. Net sales reached $15.2 billion, an increase of 20.8% from the prior-year period, exceeding the analyst consensus of approximately $13.9 billion by about 9.7%. Growth was broad-based across all four geographic regions and was led by Advanced Solutions, cloud-based solutions, and GPU and AI infrastructure.
On the bottom line, adjusted (non-GAAP) diluted EPS came in at $0.91, well above the $0.78 consensus estimate. GAAP net income increased 31.8% to $131.1 million, translating to GAAP diluted EPS of $0.57. Gross profit rose 14.6% to $996.9 million, and operating income climbed to $293.8 million from $223.5 million a year earlier. Adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) reached $390.1 million, exceeding consensus of about $339.3 million.
Cash flow improved markedly, with free cash flow of $211.2 million compared with negative $175 million in the year-ago quarter. The company also raised its quarterly dividend to $0.088 per share and issued fourth-quarter guidance above expectations, projecting net sales of $17.5 billion to $17.9 billion (a $17.7 billion midpoint) and adjusted EPS of $1.05 to $1.15.
Investors greeted the results enthusiastically. In after-hours trading following the October 29 release, INGM shares climbed roughly 7.7%, reflecting relief that the company exceeded its own guidance on every major financial metric and raised its full-year outlook. The outsized fourth-quarter revenue guide, in particular, appeared to catch the market by surprise, landing well above consensus and signaling that AI-related demand remains robust heading into the final stretch of the fiscal year. The dividend increase also reinforced management's confidence in its cash-generation trajectory. While insider selling has remained a notable theme over the past year, the broader institutional response and the immediate post-earnings price move suggest investors are interpreting the quarter as a sign of durable momentum rather than a one-off surge.
With fourth-quarter guidance raised above consensus, attention now shifts to whether Ingram Micro can sustain its double-digit growth pace and convert it into expanding profitability. Investors will be watching whether the company's adjusted operating margin, which has hovered near 1.9% to 2%, begins to show meaningful improvement as revenue scales across higher-value AI and cloud offerings.
Several factors will shape the next chapter. The trajectory of GPU and AI infrastructure spending remains central, as does the pace of adoption of the company's Xvantage platform and its broader "intelligent operating model." Supply-chain dynamics, component availability, and pricing in the technology distribution channel could influence both top-line growth and gross margin.
Finally, cash-flow quality and capital-allocation decisions will stay in focus following the dividend increase. The company's ability to keep generating positive free cash flow while investing in platform, data, and AI capabilities will be a key indicator of whether the current momentum can be maintained over the long term.
From what I see, tools like Tickeron's AI Screener have become part of my regular workflow for validating ideas and spotting comparable setups across the sector. It helps filter for technical patterns, fundamentals, and AI-driven signals without spending hours on manual work. I find it particularly useful when cross-checking results like these against peers or looking for follow-on opportunities in technology distribution.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Sergey Savastiouk, Ph.D. has a degree in Applied Mathematics from Moscow University and has extensive experience as an entrepreneur, investor, manager, and mathematician. His professional expertise is in applied mathematics, mathematical modeling, system and pattern analysis, and software and hardware system integration. He has served as the CEO of several hi-tech start-up companies and nonprofit organizations, which has given him proven capabilities in business strategy for high-tech start-up companies, market assessment, company formation, team building, product development, marketing, and sales. He has published numerous articles in journals and magazines on related fields. As a retail investor, he spent 15 years developing his proprietary trading and quantitative algorithms (now Tickeron’s A.I.), which brought him significant returns in trading the stock market. His current work and goal in founding Tickeron is to bring professional, sophisticated stock market analysis capabilities to retail investors via an easy-to-use interface.
INGM moved above its 50-day moving average on October 23, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend. In 18 of 19 similar past instances, the stock price increased further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 26, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on INGM as a result. In 27 of 37 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 73%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for INGM just turned positive on October 22, 2026. Looking at past instances where INGM's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 13 of 19 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 68%.
The 10-day moving average for INGM crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on October 28, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 6 of 8 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 75%.
Following a +3.56% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where INGM advanced for three days, in 93 of 124 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 75%.
The Stochastic Oscillator has been in the overbought zone for 2 days. Expect a price pull-back in the near future.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where INGM declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 73%.
INGM broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 01, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 48 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. INGM’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 56 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.526) is normal, around the industry mean (2.688). P/E Ratio (15.435) is within average values for comparable stocks, (16.241). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (2.284). Dividend Yield (0.012) settles around the average of (0.133) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.109) is also within normal values, averaging (139.965).
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 62 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 68 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly better than average sales and a considerably profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. INGM’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 93, placing this stock worse than average.
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Industry InformationTechnologyServices