As one of the world’s largest producers of potash, nitrogen, and phosphate fertilizers plus a significant agricultural retailer, NTR sits at the crossroads of global nutrient pricing and farm-level demand. Its quarterly updates give investors a clear window into fertilizer benchmarks, grower buying patterns, and pressures from inputs such as natural gas and sulfur. The third quarter unfolded against steady potash fundamentals and tighter nitrogen markets, yet sulfur costs climbed and North American demand softened. Beyond the numbers, management’s review of the Phosphate business points to a sharper emphasis on earnings quality and free cash flow.
For the three months ended September 30, 2026, NTR recorded net earnings of $288 million, down 39% from $469 million a year earlier, with diluted net earnings per share of $0.60 versus $0.96. Adjusted net earnings per share reached $0.61, a 37% decline and below the consensus estimate of about $0.80, according to LSEG data. Total sales edged up 1% to $6.06 billion, slightly above expectations near $5.79 billion.
Adjusted EBITDA fell 8% to $1.31 billion, led by softness in Phosphate and Nitrogen. Phosphate adjusted EBITDA dropped 93% to $8 million after sulfur-driven cost of goods sold rose to $939 per tonne. Nitrogen adjusted EBITDA declined 11% to $497 million on a 16.7% drop in sales volumes. Potash adjusted EBITDA held essentially flat at $730 million, while Retail adjusted EBITDA eased 12% to $203 million on lower crop-nutrient margins. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the stock compares to others in the industry.
On guidance, Nutrien lowered its 2026 Retail adjusted EBITDA range to $1.72–$1.85 billion and trimmed capital expenditures to $1.95–$2.00 billion, while lifting potash sales-volume guidance to 14.3–14.8 million tonnes and nitrogen volumes to 9.3–9.7 million tonnes.
Despite the earnings miss, the market focused on NTR’s shift toward cost discipline and free cash flow. The decision to close the higher-cost White Springs facility while optimizing the lower-cost Aurora operations was presented as a step to improve earnings quality. Analysts highlighted the potential for stronger free cash flow, supported by lower capital spending and higher potash volume targets.
Sentiment reflected a balance between near-term margin pressure from sulfur and nitrogen costs and longer-term benefits from portfolio simplification. The company also flagged expected fourth-quarter impairment charges against White Springs and the idled Trinidad nitrogen assets, underscoring that restructuring costs could still affect reported results even as the underlying cash-generation profile improves.
Looking ahead, attention will turn to whether these cost actions deliver structurally higher free cash flow per share. The White Springs closure, expected in the second quarter of 2027, should reduce annual sustaining capital expenditures and lease payments by roughly $50 million. Management also pointed to higher ammonia operating rates and debottlenecking to support nitrogen volumes in the fourth quarter.
Global potash fundamentals remain a key variable. Nutrien kept its forecast for 74–77 million tonnes of global potash shipments in 2026 and projects 75–79 million tonnes in 2027, backed by favorable affordability and solid demand in major importing regions.
On the cost front, sulfur feedstock availability and pricing will stay critical for Phosphate, while natural gas costs and trade flows will continue to shape nitrogen economics. Grower demand in North America, Brazil, and Australia, along with weather and credit conditions, will influence the Retail segment.
Finally, the updated guidance ranges and the effective tax rate increase to 25.5–27.0% highlight how changes in geographic earnings mix can affect adjusted results. As the company advances its portfolio optimization, the market is likely to focus more on the path of free cash flow and shareholder returns than on headline earnings swings.
One tool I turn to regularly when reviewing earnings reports like this is Tickeron’s AI Screener. It lets me filter thousands of stocks and ETFs by technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, and volatility, helping surface comparable ideas in the fertilizer space and monitor momentum shifts more efficiently than manual methods.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Sergey Savastiouk, Ph.D. has a degree in Applied Mathematics from Moscow University and has extensive experience as an entrepreneur, investor, manager, and mathematician. His professional expertise is in applied mathematics, mathematical modeling, system and pattern analysis, and software and hardware system integration. He has served as the CEO of several hi-tech start-up companies and nonprofit organizations, which has given him proven capabilities in business strategy for high-tech start-up companies, market assessment, company formation, team building, product development, marketing, and sales. He has published numerous articles in journals and magazines on related fields. As a retail investor, he spent 15 years developing his proprietary trading and quantitative algorithms (now Tickeron’s A.I.), which brought him significant returns in trading the stock market. His current work and goal in founding Tickeron is to bring professional, sophisticated stock market analysis capabilities to retail investors via an easy-to-use interface.
The RSI Indicator for NTR moved out of oversold territory on October 12, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 24 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 20 of the 24 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 83%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on November 02, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on NTR as a result. In 55 of 84 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 65%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for NTR just turned positive on October 23, 2026. Looking at past instances where NTR's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 29 of 50 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 58%.
Following a +2.51% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where NTR advanced for three days, in 229 of 321 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 71%.
The Stochastic Oscillator has been in the overbought zone for 1 day. Expect a price pull-back in the near future.
The 10-day moving average for NTR crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on October 02, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 12 of 18 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 67%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where NTR declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 69%.
NTR broke above its upper Bollinger Band on November 04, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for NTR entered a downward trend on October 21, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 46 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. NTR’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 70 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.328) is normal, around the industry mean (-0.427). P/E Ratio (14.589) is within average values for comparable stocks, (8.568). NTR's Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.982) is slightly higher than the industry average of (0.867). Dividend Yield (0.031) settles around the average of (0.130) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (1.329) is also within normal values, averaging (1.476).
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 73 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly better than average sales and a considerably profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 78 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 84 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. NTR’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 79, placing this stock worse than average.
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
a producer of fertilizers and other crop production supplies
Industry ChemicalsAgricultural