Leveraged single-stock ETFs have drawn attention from traders looking for amplified, short-term exposure to large technology names without relying on margin. NVDL and NVDX target nearly the same outcome: each aims to deliver twice the daily percentage change of NVDA, a company central to the artificial intelligence and accelerated-computing expansion. Because their goals align so closely, the comparison comes down to structural details such as liquidity, size, and how each fund achieves its leverage rather than any difference in the advertised exposure itself.
NVDL is an actively managed, non-diversified ETF from GraniteShares that seeks daily results, before fees and expenses, equal to 2x the daily percentage change in NVIDIA common stock. It launched in December 2022 and has grown into one of the larger funds in its category, with net assets in the billions. The fund builds its notional exposure mainly through swap agreements with several counterparties, along with some options and direct stock purchases. Its holdings are dominated by NVDA equity swaps, with cash and Treasury-related collateral making up the rest. The net expense ratio stands at 1.05%. Daily rebalancing to maintain the 2x target can reduce returns in choppy markets. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the fund compares with peers on volatility metrics.
NVDX is a non-diversified leveraged ETF issued by T-Rex, a brand under REX Shares and Tuttle Capital Management, and listed on the Cboe BZX Exchange. Launched in October 2023, it likewise targets 200% of NVIDIA’s daily performance before fees and expenses and carries the same 1.05% net expense ratio. Structurally, it combines direct ownership of NVIDIA shares with total return swaps to reach the 2x objective. A sizable portion of assets sits in the underlying stock, with the balance coming from swaps and cash collateral. Holdings remain limited, typically in the single digits. Like its counterpart, NVDX resets leverage each day and is meant for short-term use. Its smaller asset base results in lower trading volume and liquidity compared with the larger fund.
Both ETFs are fully exposed to one issuer in the semiconductors and artificial-intelligence infrastructure space. NVIDIA’s data-center and accelerated-computing segments have seen strong demand driven by AI-related spending from major cloud providers. There is no diversification to offset company-specific risks such as earnings variability, export restrictions, supply issues, or changes in AI investment plans. Broader market forces like interest-rate expectations and technology valuations amplify moves because of the 2x leverage. Regulatory attention on advanced chips and questions about sustained AI spending represent the main thematic concerns. In this setting, the funds serve as concentrated, high-volatility expressions of a single-stock view.
With matching leverage targets, identical fees, and the same underlying asset, the two funds have followed similar performance paths over recent periods. Small differences stem mainly from liquidity levels, tracking accuracy, and leverage mechanics. On positioning, NVDL benefits from its larger size and higher average daily volume, which support tighter spreads and smoother execution for larger trades. NVDX presents a comparable risk profile but with shallower market depth. Both products exhibit far greater volatility than NVIDIA itself and can show compounding effects during alternating daily moves. From what I see, multi-week results depend not only on the direction of NVIDIA’s price but also on the path taken along the way.
When evaluating products like these, I frequently rely on Tickeron’s AI Screener. It lets me filter ETFs by technical patterns, volatility, trend strength, and performance metrics, which helps surface relevant ideas more efficiently than manual checks. The customizable scans make side-by-side comparisons straightforward for leveraged vehicles.
Between two funds with identical leverage objectives and identical fees, Tickeron’s AI would likely favor NVDL because of its stronger liquidity, larger asset base, and longer track record. Greater volume and tighter spreads reduce trading friction, which matters for a product intended for intraday use. NVDX remains a viable alternative, yet its thinner liquidity and smaller scale add slightly higher operational considerations. Neither fund suits long-term holding because of daily resets and volatility decay; the assessment applies only to short-term tactical positioning.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
The 10-day RSI Indicator for NVDL moved out of overbought territory on October 07, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. Traders may want to look at selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 39 instances where the indicator moved out of the overbought zone. In 36 of the 39 cases the stock moved lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of a move down at 90%.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 14, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on NVDL as a result. In 55 of 58 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for NVDL turned negative on October 12, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 38 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 35 of the 38 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 90%.
NVDL moved below its 50-day moving average on October 14, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
The 10-day moving average for NVDL crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on October 20, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 12 of 13 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where NVDL declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 85%.
The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 8 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.
Following a +4.34% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where NVDL advanced for three days, in 270 of 275 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.
NVDL may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 279 of 281 cases where NVDL Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 90%.
Category Trading