Go to the list of all blogs
Joma Foster's Avatar
published in Blogs
Oct 22, 2026
TickeronGET DAILY SIGNALS
QBTS vs QUBT: Contrasting Two Quantum Computing Stocks Down -55% and -37% YTD

QBTS vs QUBT: Contrasting Two Quantum Computing Stocks Down -55% and -37% YTD

Key Takeaways

  • QBTS (D-Wave Quantum) is a pioneer in quantum annealing systems and cloud-based quantum access, with a longer commercial track record but lumpy, hardware-sale-driven revenue.
  • QUBT (Quantum Computing Inc.) is a quantum optics and integrated photonics company expanding rapidly through acquisitions and a substantially larger cash position relative to its market capitalization.
  • Both names have declined sharply in 2026 amid a sector-wide de-rating of speculative quantum stocks, though QUBT has held up slightly better on a year-to-date basis.
  • QBTS brings recent government funding and international system deployments as catalysts, while QUBT leans on manufacturing scale-up and balance-sheet strength.
  • The two companies pursue different technological approaches, making this comparison less about direct rivalry and more about contrasting risk and growth profiles.

Why This Comparison Matters

Quantum computing continues to draw attention as one of the more volatile areas in technology. QBTS and QUBT stand out as two of the sector’s better-known pure-play names, yet they take very different routes to the same opportunity. D-Wave Quantum centers on quantum annealing hardware and cloud services, while Quantum Computing Inc. focuses on room-temperature photonic quantum systems and integrated photonics. The comparison helps investors weigh relative performance, positioning, and risk across companies that operate in the same broad space but differ sharply in technology and business models.

D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) at a Glance

D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) develops quantum computing systems, software, and services, with emphasis on quantum annealing suited to optimization problems. Its lineup includes the Advantage and Advantage2 processors, the Leap cloud service, and the Ocean software development toolkit.

Market conditions have been difficult. After a strong multi-year run, QBTS shares have pulled back sharply and stand down roughly 55% year to date as of recent weeks, part of a wider de-rating in the quantum group. Second-quarter 2026 revenue came in essentially flat year over year at about $3.1 million, although bookings increased. A notable portion of 2026 revenue is still expected in the fourth quarter, which introduces some timing uncertainty.

Positive developments include a definitive agreement for up to $100 million in funding under the U.S. CHIPS and Science Act, delivery of what was described as Italy’s first annealing quantum computing system, and an expanded manufacturing partnership with SkyWater Technology. These steps highlight commercial and government progress, even as sentiment stays sensitive to execution and valuation questions.

Quantum Computing Inc. (QUBT) Snapshot

Quantum Computing Inc. (QUBT) works in quantum optics and integrated photonics, targeting room-temperature, low-power quantum machines and photonic components. Its offerings cover thin-film lithium niobate photonic chips, the Dirac-3 quantum optimization machine, and the NeuraWave photonic reservoir computing platform, aimed at high-performance computing, artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, and aerospace and defense.

QUBT has also faced pressure in 2026, with the share price down roughly 37% to 38% year to date—somewhat less severe than QBTS. The company has completed acquisitions of Luminar Semiconductor, NuCrypt, and NHanced Semiconductors in the first half of the year to build manufacturing capacity and engineering resources. First-quarter revenue rose to approximately $3.7 million, largely from those deals, and contract backlog sits in the tens of millions of dollars.

Its standout financial feature is the balance sheet. The company held roughly $1.3 billion in cash and investments at the latest update, an amount that represents a sizable share of the stock’s market value. That cushion supports plans for Fab 2 manufacturing scale-up, though it also signals expectations of continued spending before profitability arrives.

Side-by-Side Analysis

The core difference lies in technology. QBTS builds around quantum annealing, a specialized method for optimization workloads, and brings a longer operating history plus an established base of enterprise and government customers. QUBT, on the other hand, stresses room-temperature photonic systems and integrated photonics manufacturing, positioning itself to move from innovator to volume producer.

Growth drivers also diverge. QBTS relies on government funding, international system deliveries, and rising bookings, while QUBT pursues growth through acquisitions and a major manufacturing expansion. Risk profiles reflect these paths: QBTS carries execution and revenue-timing risk tied to lumpy hardware sales, whereas QUBT faces integration risk from rapid acquisitions and higher operating expenses during scale-up.

Both stocks trade well above 30 times trailing sales, leaving little margin for shortfalls, and both remain sensitive to broader technology sentiment and risk appetite. QUBT’s substantial cash position relative to market value offers one form of support, while QBTS draws backing from government contracts and commercial momentum.

Insights from AI-Assisted Review

I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the stocks compare to others in the industry. From what I see, the data points to differences in stability and positioning that align with the balance-sheet and catalyst profiles discussed above.

Exploring Automated Strategies with Tickeron

When evaluating names in fast-moving sectors like quantum computing, I often turn to Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots for a data-driven perspective. The page highlights automated trading strategies that have performed well under current market conditions, covering a range of styles and timeframes. Reviewing these options helps match systematic approaches with the volatility and sector dynamics affecting stocks such as QBTS and QUBT.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Related Ticker: QUBT, QBTS

Momentum Indicator for QUBT turns negative, indicating new downward trend

QUBT saw its Momentum Indicator move below the 0 level on October 01, 2026. This is an indication that the stock could be shifting in to a new downward move. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 81 similar instances where the indicator turned negative. In 73 of the 81 cases, the stock moved further down in the following days. The odds of a decline are at 90%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for QUBT turned negative on October 01, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 46 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 44 of the 46 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 90%.

QUBT moved below its 50-day moving average on October 01, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.

The 10-day moving average for QUBT crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on October 07, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 17 of 18 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where QUBT declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 87%.

The Aroon Indicator for QUBT entered a downward trend on October 21, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

Bullish Trend Analysis

The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where QUBT's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 21 of 25 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 84%.

The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 14 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.

Following a +6.23% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where QUBT advanced for three days, in 196 of 227 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 86%.

QUBT may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.

Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)

The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 6 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is seriously undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (0.970) is normal, around the industry mean (-6.987). QUBT's P/E Ratio (-170.500) is considerably lower than the industry average of (-3.059). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (23.994). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.011) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (169.492) is also within normal values, averaging (51.774).

The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 25 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 83 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. QUBT’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 91 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.

The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 95 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.

The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 98 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. QUBT’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 88, placing this stock worse than average.

Notable companies

The most notable companies in this group are Dell Technologies (NYSE:DELL), Arista Networks Inc (NYSE:ANET), Seagate Technology Holdings PLC (NASDAQ:STX), Western Digital Corp (NASDAQ:WDC), HP (NYSE:HPQ), 3D Systems Corp (NYSE:DDD).

Industry description

Computer Processing Hardware industry produces central processing unit, monitor, keyboard, computer data storage devices, and graphics card. Business activity and economic growth are potential drivers of this industry – if more businesses are growing or flourishing, so would their investments in computer equipment. Dell Technologies, Inc, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co., NCR Corporation are key producers of computer processing hardware.

Market Cap

The average market capitalization across the Computer Processing Hardware Industry is 27.06B. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from -0.18 to 308.93B. DELL holds the highest valuation in this group at 308.93B. The lowest valued company is HAUP at -0.18.

High and low price notable news

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the Computer Processing Hardware Industry was -2%. For the same Industry, the average monthly price growth was -16%, and the average quarterly price growth was 1%. SCKT experienced the highest price growth at 14%, while QMCO experienced the biggest fall at -26%.

Volume

The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the Computer Processing Hardware Industry was -20%. For the same stocks of the Industry, the average monthly volume growth was -15% and the average quarterly volume growth was -39%

Fundamental Analysis Ratings

The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows

Valuation Rating: 44
P/E Growth Rating: 51
Price Growth Rating: 64
SMR Rating: 80
Profit Risk Rating: 88
Seasonality Score: 24 (-100 ... +100)
View a ticker or compare two or three
QUBT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
A.I.Advisor
published price charts
A.I. Advisor
published General Information

General Information

Industry ComputerProcessingHardware

Industry
N/A
Address
No.5 Marine View Plaza
Phone
+1 703 436-2121
Employees
77
Web
https://www.quantumcomputinginc.com
Interact to see
Advertisement
The Bitwise Solana Staking ETF (BSOL) advanced roughly 18% over the trailing 30 days, closely tracking a sharp rally in Solana (SOL). The move extends a broader recovery, with BSOL up approximately 77% over the past three months from its mid-2026 trough.
MSTY is an actively managed single-stock option income ETF (exchange-traded fund) that writes call options on Strategy (MSTR), formerly MicroStrategy, to generate current income. The portfolio is anchored by U.S. Treasury bills and MSTR option contracts rather than a diversified basket of equities, concentrating exposure in one volatile underlying.
AMDL has surged roughly +64% over the past 30 days, from about $47.59 to $78.10, mirroring a powerful rally in its sole underlying stock, AMD . The fund is a leveraged single-stock ETF (exchange-traded fund) designed to deliver 2x the daily return of AMD, amplifying both gains and losses.
TSMX, a 2x daily leveraged single-stock ETF (exchange-traded fund), rose roughly +19% over the trailing 30 days, rebounding sharply from mid-September lows. The fund seeks 200% of the daily return of TSM (Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing), meaning its moves are roughly double the underlying stock's daily swings.
Contracted revenue anchor: A roughly $3.2 billion, seven-year LNG (liquefied natural gas) supply agreement with Puerto Rico has received final approval, providing multi-year cash-flow visibility if execution stays on track. Project pipeline inflection: Upcoming milestones include the Barcarena and PortoCem power plants in Brazil, a potential Gás Sul terminal restart, and optimization of the company's modular "Fast LNG" (FLNG) liquefaction fleet.
AMD (Advanced Micro Devices) designs central processing units (CPUs), graphics processing units (GPUs), and AI accelerators, while LRCX (Lam Research) supplies the wafer-fabrication equipment used to build advanced chips. AMD has delivered strong double-digit revenue growth on AI data-center demand, but its shares trade with elevated expectations that can trigger sharp reactions around earnings.
Origination momentum: Velocity Financial enters 2026 off record annual originations of roughly $2.7 billion (up about 48%), positioning it to keep gaining share in a fragmented investor-loan market. Credit normalization is the central watch item: Nonperforming loans fell toward the 8.5% range of portfolio unpaid principal balance (UPB), but asset quality remains the primary swing factor for earnings.
Turnaround milestone ahead: Management has pointed to reaching cash generation in 2027, making the pace of cost discipline and margin recovery the central question for the stock forecast. Fresh capital supports execution: A recently announced $45.5 million equity financing, with participation from management and a single institutional investor, strengthens the balance sheet as the company funds its transformation.
NFE closed at $5.51, down -6.13% during Tuesday's regular session, extending a slide that has pushed shares near a 52-week low. Primary catalyst: the company disclosed its Fast LNG unit is offline after a gas-turbine mechanical failure, with return to service not expected until Q4.
The central $11 target is the arithmetic mean of four verified analyst price targets, rounded from roughly $10.75. With the stock near $2.06, reaching $11 would require an upside of more than 400%, an extremely large move.
The $23 central target is the rounded arithmetic mean of four verified analyst price targets, which average $23.25. The latest verified price is around $9.57, meaning the target implies roughly 140% upside—a very large move.
NXH closed down -11.17% (-$0.23) to $1.83 on Oct 6, the most recent regular session, extending a steep two-day decline. Selling continued as investors digested the mutual termination of the Fathom Holdings merger and a dilutive $45.5M registered direct offering of ~16.5M shares at $2.76.
AMD is a large-cap designer of CPUs (central processing units) and GPUs (graphics processing units) competing directly with Nvidia in the AI accelerator market, while FORM is a small-cap provider of semiconductor test and measurement equipment, primarily probe cards. AMD's narrative has been driven by multi-billion-dollar hyperscaler deals, while FORM's has been powered by record revenue and sharp margin expansion tied to high-bandwidth memory (HBM) demand.
AMD has surged roughly 200% year to date, crossing a $1 trillion market capitalization on AI data-center demand and a "CPU renaissance" narrative. KLAC has gained about 71% year to date, supported by record process-control revenue and rapid growth in advanced packaging for AI chips.
AMD is a large-cap semiconductor designer riding explosive AI compute demand, while ENTG is a mid-cap supplier of materials and purity solutions that feed the same AI-driven chip cycle. AMD recently crossed a $1 trillion market capitalization on surging data center revenue, whereas ENTG operates at a far smaller scale (roughly $23 billion) with steadier, double-digit growth.
VELO closed Tuesday at $9.57, unchanged (+0.00%) from the prior session, with the move occurring during regular market hours. The flat close marked stabilization after Monday's -14.5% plunge, when shares fell to $9.57 from $11.20 following disclosure of CFO James Suva's departure.
The $8 target used here is a technical, publicly discussed recovery objective — not an analyst consensus — because legacy analyst price targets were set before NFE's restructuring and reverse stock split. New Fortress Energy Inc. ( NFE ) trades near $5.51, so reaching $8 implies a roughly 45% advance.
AVBP plunged -46.98% during Tuesday's regular session, closing at $15.09 versus $28.46, marking its worst single-day decline on record. The catalyst was the Phase 3 FURVENT trial of firmonertinib failing its primary endpoint—progression-free survival—in first-line EGFR exon 20 insertion non-small cell lung cancer.
Upcoming catalyst: The company's next earnings release is estimated for November 6, 2026, which should offer fresh detail on its SKY token holdings, staking rewards, and treasury strategy. Strategic positioning: SDEV is an on-chain holding company providing public-market exposure to the Sky protocol ecosystem, with SKY as its core digital asset and a stated focus on the stablecoin economy.
Different roles in the chip ecosystem: AMAT is a materials-engineering and deposition leader, while KLAC dominates process control, inspection, and yield management. Momentum favors AMAT: AMAT shares have more than doubled this year, while KLAC has recently pulled back roughly 9% in a month on margin and execution concerns.