Thryv Holdings provides digital marketing solutions and cloud-based business-management tools for small-to-medium-sized businesses, with both a SaaS segment and a legacy Marketing Services (YP) business. Coverage remains limited, and targets have been reduced sharply as shares declined. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the stock compares to others in the industry.
Three recent, clearly attributable targets form the basis of the $4.70 figure. Needham (Scott Berg) maintained a Buy with a $6.00 target in February 2026, trimming its prior $14.00 view. B. Riley Securities kept a Buy rating but cut its target to $5.00 from $15.00 in February 2026. RBC Capital (Matthew Swanson) is more cautious, holding a Sector Perform (Hold) rating with a $3.00 target after lowering it from $4.00 in August 2026. The mean of these three is $4.67, rounded to $4.70, with a range of $3.00 to $6.00.
The wide range reflects genuinely different assumptions: more optimistic analysts emphasize an on-track SaaS platform, cost restructuring, and favorable risk-reward, while the cautious view weighs near-term SaaS softness and cash-flow pressure. Other firms, including Craig-Hallum and William Blair, have also commented on the stock, but their specific targets were not consistently verifiable across sources.
With the stock near $1.29 and a 52-week range of roughly $1.09 to $6.60, the shares sit just above their 52-week low. Reaching $4.70 implies upside of about 264% — a very large move that would require a fundamental re-rating rather than a modest bounce. From what I see, the business generates roughly $711 million to $740 million in trailing revenue, but it remains modestly unprofitable, with trailing EPS near negative $0.36. The market capitalization has contracted to around $55 million, meaning the stock trades at roughly 0.07 times sales and below book value.
The shares are in a clear long-term downtrend, trading below both the 50-day and 200-day moving averages (recently around $1.54 and $3.02, respectively). The $1.09 area marks the 52-week low and a key support level, with the psychological $1.00 level just beneath it. On the upside, the 200-day average near $3.00 is an important resistance zone that would need to be reclaimed before the $4.70 target becomes relevant. The former $6–$7 range represents the top of the 52-week band. I’m watching this closely for any shifts that might appear in the technical setup.
Analyst price targets generally reflect a research horizon of roughly 12 months, though no firm timeline is guaranteed. Investors should monitor quarterly earnings and guidance, SaaS subscription and retention metrics, free cash flow, any restructuring or capital-raising announcements, and further analyst target revisions. Given the recent post-earnings volatility, the company's next reports and any commentary on liquidity and profitability will be especially important.
The $4.70 central target is the mean of three recent analyst price targets and sits far above the current price near $1.29, implying a very large ~264% move. The wide $3.00–$6.00 range shows that even analysts who follow the stock disagree sharply on the turnaround's pace. The strongest supports are the low valuation, the SaaS platform's potential, and cost-restructuring efforts, while the principal obstacles are persistent losses, a shrinking market cap, and a history of downward target revisions. Reaching $4.70 would require a substantial and sustained improvement in profitability and sentiment, not a routine rally. Investors should watch earnings, cash flow, and liquidity developments before drawing conclusions.
In my analysis of volatile names such as THRY, I often turn to Tickeron’s AI Daily Buy/Sell Signals to monitor momentum shifts. These AI-driven signals scan thousands of stocks and ETFs in real time, helping identify potential Buy, Sell, or Hold points based on technical and market changes. For a low-priced stock with wide analyst disagreement, the tool can flag developing trends more efficiently than manual review alone. It has become a regular part of my routine when evaluating turnaround candidates.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Sergey Savastiouk, Ph.D. has a degree in Applied Mathematics from Moscow University and has extensive experience as an entrepreneur, investor, manager, and mathematician. His professional expertise is in applied mathematics, mathematical modeling, system and pattern analysis, and software and hardware system integration. He has served as the CEO of several hi-tech start-up companies and nonprofit organizations, which has given him proven capabilities in business strategy for high-tech start-up companies, market assessment, company formation, team building, product development, marketing, and sales. He has published numerous articles in journals and magazines on related fields. As a retail investor, he spent 15 years developing his proprietary trading and quantitative algorithms (now Tickeron’s A.I.), which brought him significant returns in trading the stock market. His current work and goal in founding Tickeron is to bring professional, sophisticated stock market analysis capabilities to retail investors via an easy-to-use interface.
The Aroon Indicator for THRY entered a downward trend on November 09, 2026. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor identified a pattern where the AroonDown red line was above 70 while the AroonUp green line was below 30 for three straight days. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. A.I.dvisor looked at 283 similar instances where the Aroon Indicator formed such a pattern. In 250 of the 283 cases the stock moved lower. This puts the odds of a downward move at 88%.
The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 46 of 53 cases where THRY's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 87%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where THRY declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 84%.
The RSI Oscillator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where THRY's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 24 of 38 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 63%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on November 09, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on THRY as a result. In 57 of 85 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 67%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for THRY just turned positive on October 22, 2026. Looking at past instances where THRY's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 32 of 44 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 73%.
Following a +4.84% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where THRY advanced for three days, in 178 of 275 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 65%.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 23 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (0.247) is normal, around the industry mean (-1.906). P/E Ratio (-3.264) is within average values for comparable stocks, (9.554). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (2.824). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.069) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.123) is also within normal values, averaging (70.383).
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 75 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 89 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. THRY’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 93 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 98 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. THRY’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 94, placing this stock worse than average.
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Industry PackagedSoftware