CoreWeave is a modern cloud infrastructure company that offers Nvidia GPUs and other essential AI hardware with optimized efficiency to handle the most demanding AI training and inference workloads... Show more
CoreWeave, Inc. is a specialized cloud infrastructure provider — often described as an "AI hyperscaler" or "neocloud" — that rents high-performance NVIDIA GPU computing capacity to businesses developing and running artificial intelligence models. The company's CoreWeave Cloud platform is purpose-built for demanding AI training and inference workloads, differentiating it from general-purpose cloud providers such as Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud. Founded in 2017 and formerly known as Atlantic Crypto, CoreWeave completed its initial public offering on Nasdaq in March 2025 and is headquartered in Livingston, New Jersey. Its customers include Microsoft, OpenAI, Meta, and Anthropic, and the company competes in part with hyperscalers like Amazon, Alphabet, and Oracle.
Over the last 30 days, CRWV fell about 21%, from a closing price of $105.26 on August 14 to $82.98 on September 14. The move was not a straight line: shares climbed above $108 in the days after the company's second-quarter earnings report before giving back those gains and drifting lower through late August and early September.
The last quarter has been similarly volatile. From a mid-June close near $106.71, the stock declined roughly 22% to $82.98, but the path included a slide to a 52-week low of $60.55 in late July, a sharp rebound toward $108 after earnings, and a renewed fade into mid-September. A "death cross" formed in July when the 50-day simple moving average fell below the 200-day moving average, reflecting the stock's broader loss of momentum.
CoreWeave's second-quarter results, reported August 11–12, initially lifted the stock. Revenue rose 112% year over year to $2.58 billion, adjusted EBITDA reached $1.51 billion, and the company raised its full-year revenue guidance to a range of $12.4 billion to $13.2 billion. Management also reported a revenue backlog of roughly $104 billion, excluding more than $25 billion in commitments signed early in the third quarter. Shares jumped more than 15% in after-hours trading.
That rally faded as investors weighed the company's heavy capital spending — full-year 2026 capex guidance of $35 billion to $39 billion — and a widening net loss of $626 million driven by rising interest expense. Profit-taking and a broader rotation out of high-valuation growth and AI-linked names compounded the decline.
The sharpest single-day move came on September 14, when shares fell more than 6% after Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei called for a deliberate slowdown in AI model development, a view endorsed by OpenAI's Sam Altman, Tesla CEO Elon Musk, and Google DeepMind's Demis Hassabis. Bernstein analyst Madison Rezaei, who maintains a Sell rating with a $74 price target, argued CoreWeave is among the most exposed to an AI training slowdown because roughly 25% of its active U.S. power and about 74% of its contracted power sits in rural and Tier 3–4 markets built for training rather than low-latency inference. Rising 10-year Treasury yields, which briefly touched 5%, added further pressure.
The quarterly decline reflects a broader reassessment of the AI infrastructure trade. After a rapid run-up in 2025 and early 2026, investors began scrutinizing whether demand for AI compute would justify the sector's enormous spending on GPUs, power, and data centers. CoreWeave's capital-intensive model, funded partly with asset-backed debt, made it a focal point for those concerns. Local data center moratoriums and questions about execution also weighed on sentiment earlier in the quarter.
The July low near $60.55 marked a trough, and the second-quarter earnings beat triggered a sharp recovery as investors focused on accelerating revenue and a growing backlog. However, the subsequent AI safety debate refocused attention on how quickly demand could shift from training toward inference, renewing pressure on neocloud valuations into mid-September.
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of AI-driven trading bots from a platform offering hundreds of automated strategies across thousands of tickers. Because only the top-performing and most relevant bots appear in this section, traders can quickly scan the strategies currently gaining traction in the market. The bots vary widely in strategy, holding timeframe, and performance metrics, so the page provides a snapshot of diversified automated approaches rather than a single recommendation. Investors monitoring volatile names like CRWV may find it a useful resource for observing how AI-based systems are positioning across different time horizons.
Looking ahead, several factors are likely to shape CRWV. The company's next quarterly report will be closely watched for confirmation that revenue growth and margin expansion remain on track. Hyperscaler capital expenditure guidance from Microsoft, Amazon, Meta, and Alphabet will serve as a key read on underlying AI infrastructure demand. Investors should also monitor whether the AI safety debate translates into actual changes in spending, the company's progress toward its roughly 1.85-gigawatt active power target, refinancing activity given its substantial debt load, and growth in higher-margin managed inference and software revenue. Regulatory developments around data center siting remain a watch item as well.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for CRWV turned positive on September 24, 2026. Looking at past instances where CRWV's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 13 of 14 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on September 28, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on CRWV as a result. In 15 of 20 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 75%.
CRWV moved above its 50-day moving average on September 30, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
Following a +3.07% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where CRWV advanced for three days, in 76 of 82 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.
The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 18 of 20 cases where CRWV's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.
The 10-day moving average for CRWV crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on September 23, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 4 of 4 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where CRWV declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.
CRWV broke above its upper Bollinger Band on September 08, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for CRWV entered a downward trend on September 22, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 38 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (9.337) is normal, around the industry mean (18.522). P/E Ratio (0.000) is within average values for comparable stocks, (158.311). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (3.648). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.004) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (5.721) is also within normal values, averaging (104.490).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 54 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. CRWV’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 98 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. CRWV’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 91, placing this stock worse than average.
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Industry ComputerCommunications