Zevia PBC's third quarter 2026 results arrive at a pivotal moment for the zero-sugar, naturally sweetened beverage company. The report follows a recently announced $20 million growth equity investment from GP Investments, which management has framed as the catalyst for a broad strategic reset centered on product innovation, digital-first marketing, and a hybrid go-to-market model. I am watching closely to see whether ZVIA can convert early signs of momentum in its club-channel rotation and e-commerce strength into sustained, profitable growth. With prior quarters marked by elevated marketing spend and adjusted EBITDA losses, this report offers a key test of whether the company's cost discipline and pricing actions are translating into a meaningfully narrower path to profitability.
ZVIA reported third quarter 2026 net sales of $48.3 million, an 18.4% increase from $40.8 million in the prior-year quarter. The result came in well above the consensus estimate of approximately $44.8 million and was driven by a national rotation in the club channel, strength in e-commerce, and higher net average selling prices reflecting pricing actions taken earlier in the year. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the stock compares to others in the industry.
Gross margin expanded to 46.4%, up 80 basis points from 45.6% a year ago, despite higher aluminum costs. Net loss attributable to Zevia PBC narrowed to roughly $2.1 million, or $(0.03) per share, compared with a loss of $2.7 million, or $(0.04) per share, in the same period last year. Adjusted EBITDA improved to a loss of $0.9 million, versus a $1.7 million loss in the prior-year quarter.
Management also raised full-year 2026 net sales guidance to $177 million to $179 million, up from its prior outlook, reflecting approximately 10% growth at the midpoint. The company noted that the discontinuation of its tea line reduced the net sales outlook by about 2%. Zevia ended the quarter with roughly $29.5 million in cash and an undrawn $20 million revolving credit line, with approximately $50 million in cash on hand after closing the growth equity investment.
Investor sentiment heading into the report had been cautious but improving. Zevia had signaled in late October, alongside its growth equity announcement, that preliminary third quarter sales would reach approximately $48 million and that adjusted EBITDA would be far better than its earlier guidance range. That pre-announcement helped set expectations for an upside result, and the confirmed beat on both the top and bottom lines reinforced the improving narrative around the company's turnaround. The focus now shifts to whether the market rewards the raised full-year guidance and the GP Investments partnership as a durable inflection point, while weighing continued net losses and the dilutive structure of the new convertible preferred stock.
Looking ahead, investors will be watching whether ZVIA can sustain its double-digit sales growth while continuing to narrow adjusted EBITDA losses. The raised full-year guidance of $177 million to $179 million points to ongoing momentum, but the company remains unprofitable on a net basis, and elevated marketing spend tied to its Cardi B campaign is expected to remain a near-term cost driver.
The $20 million GP Investments partnership adds both capital and strategic oversight, with GP Investments gaining a board seat and a convertible preferred stake that carries a 6% dividend payable in kind. Management has said it intends to accelerate product innovation with a focus on the functional beverage space, scale a digital-first consumer ecosystem, and execute a hybrid go-to-market strategy. Key factors to monitor include the pace of club-channel normalization, e-commerce growth, gross margin trends amid aluminum cost pressure, and the company's ability to convert higher brand awareness into repeat purchase and household penetration.
I regularly turn to Tickeron’s AI Daily Buy/Sell Signals when reviewing earnings beats like this one, as the platform helps surface pattern-based insights across consumer staples names. It keeps my screening process efficient without replacing my own fundamental review of the numbers.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Sergey Savastiouk, Ph.D. has a degree in Applied Mathematics from Moscow University and has extensive experience as an entrepreneur, investor, manager, and mathematician. His professional expertise is in applied mathematics, mathematical modeling, system and pattern analysis, and software and hardware system integration. He has served as the CEO of several hi-tech start-up companies and nonprofit organizations, which has given him proven capabilities in business strategy for high-tech start-up companies, market assessment, company formation, team building, product development, marketing, and sales. He has published numerous articles in journals and magazines on related fields. As a retail investor, he spent 15 years developing his proprietary trading and quantitative algorithms (now Tickeron’s A.I.), which brought him significant returns in trading the stock market. His current work and goal in founding Tickeron is to bring professional, sophisticated stock market analysis capabilities to retail investors via an easy-to-use interface.
The Aroon Indicator for ZVIA entered a downward trend on October 23, 2026. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor identified a pattern where the AroonDown red line was above 70 while the AroonUp green line was below 30 for three straight days. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. A.I.dvisor looked at 262 similar instances where the Aroon Indicator formed such a pattern. In 242 of the 262 cases the stock moved lower. This puts the odds of a downward move at 90%.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 30, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on ZVIA as a result. In 81 of 92 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 88%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for ZVIA turned negative on November 02, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 46 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 39 of the 46 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 85%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where ZVIA declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 89%.
The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where ZVIA's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 27 of 36 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 75%.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 2 days, which means it's wise to expect a price bounce in the near future.
Following a +4.20% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where ZVIA advanced for three days, in 202 of 247 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 82%.
ZVIA may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 15 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 17 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.912) is normal, around the industry mean (-3.830). P/E Ratio (-9.000) is within average values for comparable stocks, (25.945). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (3.732). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.039) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.538) is also within normal values, averaging (2.785).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 76 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. ZVIA’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 95 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. ZVIA’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 73, placing this stock worse than average.
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Industry BeveragesNonAlcoholic