AAAU
Price
$38.27
Change
-$1.35 (-3.41%)
Updated
Oct 30 closing price
Net Assets
2.55B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GLDM
Price
$76.83
Change
-$2.73 (-3.43%)
Updated
Oct 30 closing price
Net Assets
30.49B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AAAU vs GLDM

AAAU vs GLDM Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Oct 21, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU) vs. SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM)

Key Takeaways

  • Both AAAU and GLDM are physically backed gold exchange-traded funds (ETFs) that track the LBMA Gold Price PM, offering direct exposure to gold bullion stored in secure vaults.
  • GLDM maintains a lower expense ratio of 0.10% compared to 0.18% for AAAU, providing a structural cost advantage over time.
  • Each ETF holds a single asset—physical gold—resulting in identical exposure profiles with no equity holdings or sector diversification beyond precious metals.
  • Both funds operate as grantor trusts, ensuring transparent, physically allocated gold without lending or derivatives, though they carry collectibles tax treatment under U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) rules.
  • GLDM benefits from significantly higher assets under management (AUM) and trading volume, supporting tighter bid-ask spreads and greater liquidity for institutional and retail investors.
  • In the current environment of macroeconomic uncertainty and interest rate sensitivity, both ETFs serve as portfolio hedges, with relative performance driven primarily by gold price movements rather than fund-specific factors.

Introduction

Gold exchange-traded funds (ETFs) have gained renewed attention amid persistent inflation concerns, geopolitical tensions, and shifting monetary policy expectations. AAAU and GLDM compete directly within the physically backed gold category, delivering nearly identical exposure to the spot price of gold. Investors evaluating these vehicles focus on subtle differences in cost structure, liquidity, and operational scale rather than divergent strategies or holdings. This comparison highlights how these structural elements influence long-term suitability for portfolios seeking commodity exposure without the complexities of futures contracts or mining equities.

Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU) Overview

The Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU) seeks to reflect the performance of the price of gold bullion, less the expenses of the trust. Launched in July 2018 and issued by Goldman Sachs, the fund holds physical gold bars meeting London Good Delivery standards in secure vaults. It maintains one holding—gold bullion—representing 100% of assets. The expense ratio stands at 0.18%. As a grantor trust, AAAU provides transparent physical allocation without rebalancing or active management. Shares correspond to a fractional interest in the underlying gold, with no dividends distributed. The structure emphasizes simplicity and direct ownership, distinguishing it from synthetic or futures-based alternatives.

SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) Overview

The SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) aims to reflect the performance of the price of gold bullion, less the trust’s expenses. Launched in June 2018 and sponsored by the World Gold Council with State Street Global Advisors involvement, the fund also holds physical gold bullion as its sole asset. It maintains one holding—gold—accounting for 100% of assets. The expense ratio is 0.10%. Structured as a grantor trust, GLDM delivers straightforward physical exposure with no lending of gold and transparent daily valuation. Shares represent fractional undivided interests in the trust’s net assets. The lower fee and larger scale differentiate GLDM within the physically backed gold segment.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The physically backed gold ETF sector operates within the broader precious metals commodity market, influenced by macroeconomic drivers including central bank gold purchases, real interest rate movements, U.S. dollar strength, and geopolitical risk premiums. Regulatory frameworks emphasize custody standards and transparency for grantor trusts, with no recent major changes affecting these vehicles. Capital flows into gold ETFs have fluctuated with investor demand for inflation hedges and portfolio diversification during periods of equity market volatility. Risks include gold price volatility tied to monetary policy shifts and opportunity costs relative to interest-bearing assets. Both AAAU and GLDM benefit from the sector’s established infrastructure for secure storage and liquidity, positioning them as efficient vehicles for gold exposure without operational complexities.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Over recent market cycles, AAAU and GLDM have exhibited nearly identical performance patterns, tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM with minimal deviation attributable to expense ratios. In recent weeks and months, both funds have responded similarly to gold price fluctuations driven by interest rate expectations and safe-haven demand. GLDM’s lower expense ratio contributes to a modest long-term performance edge through reduced fee drag. Volatility remains comparable, reflecting the shared single-asset exposure. Relative positioning favors GLDM for cost-conscious investors seeking higher liquidity, while AAAU offers comparable exposure at a slightly higher cost. Sector rotation and macroeconomic shifts affect both equally, underscoring their role as complementary rather than differentiated tools within gold allocation strategies.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently favor GLDM with moderate probability. The lower expense ratio of 0.10%, combined with substantially higher assets under management and trading volume, supports superior cost efficiency and liquidity. Both ETFs share identical gold exposure and risk profiles, but GLDM’s scale and fee advantage enhance its positioning for sustained use in diversified portfolios seeking gold exposure.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
AAAU vs. GLDM commentary
Nov 02, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AAAU is a Hold and GLDM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
A.I.Advisor
a Summary for AAAU with price predictions
Oct 30, 2026

AAAU sees MACD Histogram just turned negative

AAAU saw its Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) turn negative on October 22, 2026. This is a bearish signal that suggests the stock could decline going forward. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 50 instances where the indicator turned negative. In 34 of the 50 cases the stock moved lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of a downward move at 68%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 22, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on AAAU as a result. In 54 of 88 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 61%.

The 10-day moving average for AAAU crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on September 28, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 8 of 12 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 67%.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where AAAU declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 66%.

The Aroon Indicator for AAAU entered a downward trend on October 30, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

Bullish Trend Analysis

The RSI Indicator entered the oversold zone -- be on the watch for AAAU's price rising or consolidating in the future. That's also the time to consider buying the stock or exploring call options.

The Stochastic Oscillator is in the oversold zone. Keep an eye out for a move up in the foreseeable future.

Following a +1.54% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where AAAU advanced for three days, in 272 of 325 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 84%.

AAAU may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.

A.I.Advisor
a Summary for GLDM with price predictions
Oct 30, 2026

GLDM sees MACD Histogram just turned negative

GLDM saw its Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) turn negative on October 22, 2026. This is a bearish signal that suggests the stock could decline going forward. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 49 instances where the indicator turned negative. In 33 of the 49 cases the stock moved lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of a downward move at 67%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 22, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on GLDM as a result. In 55 of 88 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 62%.

The 10-day moving average for GLDM crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on September 28, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 8 of 12 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 67%.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where GLDM declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 66%.

The Aroon Indicator for GLDM entered a downward trend on October 30, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

Bullish Trend Analysis

The RSI Indicator entered the oversold zone -- be on the watch for GLDM's price rising or consolidating in the future. That's also the time to consider buying the stock or exploring call options.

The Stochastic Oscillator is in the oversold zone. Keep an eye out for a move up in the foreseeable future.

Following a +1.54% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where GLDM advanced for three days, in 275 of 327 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 84%.

GLDM may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AAAUGLDM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
AAAU
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GLDM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OCCI2.18N/A
N/A
OFS Credit Company
QQUP60.10N/A
N/A
ProShares Ultra Top QQQ
XPEG4.96N/A
N/A
Leverage Shares 2X Long Xpev Daily ETF
ILCV109.29-0.49
-0.45%
iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV)
KJAN45.86-0.43
-0.93%
Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - January (KJAN)