Ad is loading...
AABFX vs HBLAX
AABFX vs HBLAX Comparison
Open Charts AABFX vs HBLAX
Thrivent Dynamic Allocation A
Price$13.40
Change+$0.39 (+3.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets387.82M
Hartford Balanced Income A
Price$14.02
Change+$0.36 (+2.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.26B
AABFX vs HBLAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AABFX vs. HBLAX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AABFX is a Buy and HBLAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 11.3B vs. AABFX (388M). HBLAX pays higher dividends than AABFX: HBLAX (3.37) vs AABFX (2.88). AABFX was incepted earlier than HBLAX: AABFX (27 years) vs HBLAX (19 years). AABFX (1.03) is less costly to investors than HBLAX (0.89). AABFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. HBLAX (61.00). HBLAX initial investment is less costly to investors than AABFX (5%) vs AABFX (5%). AABFX (2000) and HBLAX (2000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. AABFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.61 vs. HBLAX (-1.74). AABFX return over 5 years is better than : 28.70 vs. HBLAX (13.46).
| AABFX | HBLAX | AABFX / HBLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.89 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.89 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.746 | -2.817 | 168% |
| Front Load | 5% | 6% | 82% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 2000 | - |
| Net Assets | 388M | 11.3B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.88 | 3.37 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.61 | -1.74 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.63 | -1.08 | -338% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.70 | 13.46 | 213% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.52 | 25.85 | 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers