Ad is loading...
AABFX vs HBLAX
AABFX vs HBLAX Comparison
Open Charts AABFX vs HBLAX
Thrivent Balanced Income Plus A
Price$14.03
Change-$0.05 (-0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets417.77M
Hartford Balanced Income A
Price$14.59
Change-$0.02 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.12B
AABFX vs HBLAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AABFX vs. HBLAX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AABFX is a Buy and HBLAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. AABFX (418M). HBLAX pays higher dividends than AABFX: HBLAX (3.35) vs AABFX (2.88). AABFX was incepted earlier than HBLAX: AABFX (27 years) vs HBLAX (19 years). AABFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. HBLAX (57.00). AABFX (2000) and HBLAX (2000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. AABFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.28 vs. HBLAX (6.46). AABFX return over 5 years is better than : 17.71 vs. HBLAX (8.83).
| AABFX | HBLAX | AABFX / HBLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.036 | 2.891 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 2000 | - |
| Net Assets | 418M | 12.1B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.88 | 3.35 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.28 | 6.46 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.32 | 4.60 | 224% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.71 | 8.83 | 200% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.10 | 33.61 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers