Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AABFX vs HBLAX
AABFX vs HBLAX Comparison
Open Charts AABFX vs HBLAX
AABFX vs HBLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AABFX vs. HBLAX commentary
Jul 31, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AABFX is a Buy and HBLAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. AABFX (453M). HBLAX pays higher dividends than AABFX: HBLAX (3.18) vs AABFX (2.73). AABFX was incepted earlier than HBLAX: AABFX (29 years) vs HBLAX (20 years). AABFX (1.03) is less costly to investors than HBLAX (0.89). HBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. AABFX (78.00). HBLAX initial investment is less costly to investors than AABFX (5%) vs AABFX (5%). AABFX (2000) and HBLAX (2000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. AABFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.96 vs. HBLAX (4.73). AABFX return over 5 years is better than : 12.27 vs. HBLAX (5.48).
| AABFX | HBLAX | AABFX / HBLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.89 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.89 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.650 | 4.426 | 105% |
| Front Load | 5% | 6% | 82% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 2000 | - |
| Net Assets | 453M | 11.1B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.73 | 3.18 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.96 | 4.73 | 126% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.86 | 17.35 | 138% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.27 | 5.48 | 224% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.18 | 38.57 | 130% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers