Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AABFX vs HBLAX
AABFX vs HBLAX Comparison
Open Charts AABFX vs HBLAX
AABFX vs HBLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AABFX vs. HBLAX commentary
Sep 21, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AABFX is a Hold and HBLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 10.8B vs. AABFX (452M). HBLAX pays higher dividends than AABFX: HBLAX (3.13) vs AABFX (2.72). AABFX was incepted earlier than HBLAX: AABFX (29 years) vs HBLAX (20 years). AABFX (1.03) is less costly to investors than HBLAX (0.89). HBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. AABFX (78.00). HBLAX initial investment is less costly to investors than AABFX (5%) vs AABFX (5%). AABFX (2000) and HBLAX (2000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. AABFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.75 vs. HBLAX (1.55). AABFX return over 5 years is better than : 11.83 vs. HBLAX (4.65).
| AABFX | HBLAX | AABFX / HBLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.89 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.89 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.862 | 3.727 | 130% |
| Front Load | 5% | 6% | 82% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 2000 | - |
| Net Assets | 452M | 10.8B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.72 | 3.13 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.75 | 1.55 | 178% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.93 | 19.53 | 138% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.83 | 4.65 | 255% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.24 | 38.04 | 132% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement