Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AABFX vs HBLCX
AABFX vs HBLCX Comparison
Open Charts AABFX vs HBLCX
AABFX vs HBLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AABFX vs. HBLCX commentary
Jul 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AABFX is a StrongBuy and HBLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLCX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. AABFX (462M). AABFX pays higher dividends than HBLCX: AABFX (2.73) vs HBLCX (2.47). AABFX was incepted earlier than HBLCX: AABFX (29 years) vs HBLCX (20 years). HBLCX (1.65) is less costly to investors than AABFX (1.03). HBLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. AABFX (78.00). AABFX (2000) and HBLCX (2000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. AABFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.33 vs. HBLCX (3.34). AABFX return over 5 years is better than : 13.63 vs. HBLCX (1.54).
| AABFX | HBLCX | AABFX / HBLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.65 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.65 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.567 | 3.809 | 146% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 2000 | - |
| Net Assets | 462M | 11.1B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.73 | 2.47 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.33 | 3.34 | 220% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.38 | 16.71 | 164% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.63 | 1.54 | 885% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.49 | 28.45 | 184% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement