Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AABFX vs HBLCX
AABFX vs HBLCX Comparison
Open Charts AABFX vs HBLCX
AABFX vs HBLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AABFX vs. HBLCX commentary
Jun 21, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AABFX is a Hold and HBLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLCX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. AABFX (464M). AABFX (2.56) and HBLCX (2.49) have matching dividends . AABFX was incepted earlier than HBLCX: AABFX (28 years) vs HBLCX (20 years). HBLCX (1.65) is less costly to investors than AABFX (1.03). HBLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. AABFX (78.00). AABFX (2000) and HBLCX (2000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. AABFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.11 vs. HBLCX (5.05). AABFX return over 5 years is better than : 16.32 vs. HBLCX (2.78).
| AABFX | HBLCX | AABFX / HBLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.65 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.65 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.697 | 3.319 | 172% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 2000 | - |
| Net Assets | 464M | 11.2B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.56 | 2.49 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.11 | 5.05 | 200% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.63 | 10.07 | 205% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.32 | 2.78 | 588% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.34 | 31.49 | 176% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement