Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AABFX vs HBLRX
AABFX vs HBLRX Comparison
Open Charts AABFX vs HBLRX
AABFX vs HBLRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AABFX vs. HBLRX commentary
Sep 21, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AABFX is a Hold and HBLRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLRX has more cash in the bank: 10.8B vs. AABFX (452M). HBLRX (2.74) and AABFX (2.72) have matching dividends . AABFX was incepted earlier than HBLRX: AABFX (29 years) vs HBLRX (16 years). HBLRX (1.27) is less costly to investors than AABFX (1.03). HBLRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. AABFX (78.00). HBLRX has a lower initial minimum investment than AABFX: HBLRX (0) vs AABFX (2000). AABFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.75 vs. HBLRX (1.14). AABFX return over 5 years is better than : 11.83 vs. HBLRX (2.70).
| AABFX | HBLRX | AABFX / HBLRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.27 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.27 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.862 | 3.434 | 142% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 452M | 10.8B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.72 | 2.74 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.75 | 1.14 | 241% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.93 | 18.19 | 148% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.83 | 2.70 | 439% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.24 | 33.72 | 149% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement