Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AABPX vs RLBAX
AABPX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts AABPX vs RLBAX
AABPX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AABPX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AABPX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. AABPX (105M). AABPX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: AABPX (2.02) vs RLBAX (1.11). AABPX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: AABPX (32 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). RLBAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than AABPX (1.16). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. AABPX (31.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than AABPX: RLBAX (250) vs AABPX (2500). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.17 vs. AABPX (3.26). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 28.90 vs. AABPX (-5.80).
| AABPX | RLBAX | AABPX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.32 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.32 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.497 | 8.124 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 105M | 288B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.02 | 1.11 | 182% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.26 | 11.17 | 29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.52 | 36.52 | 40% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.80 | 28.90 | -20% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.69 | 72.56 | 5% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement