Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AADBX vs RLBAX
AADBX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts AADBX vs RLBAX
AADBX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AADBX vs. RLBAX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AADBX is a Hold and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 283B vs. AADBX (106M). AADBX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: AADBX (1.74) vs RLBAX (1.13). AADBX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: AADBX (39 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). RLBAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than AADBX (0.88). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. AADBX (31.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than AADBX: RLBAX (250) vs AADBX (250000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.06 vs. AADBX (6.75). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 29.37 vs. AADBX (5.17).
| AADBX | RLBAX | AADBX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.32 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.32 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.365 | 9.150 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 250 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 106M | 283B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.74 | 1.13 | 154% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.75 | 11.06 | 61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.38 | 40.94 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.17 | 29.37 | 18% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.97 | 73.43 | 27% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers