Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AADBX vs RLBAX
AADBX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts AADBX vs RLBAX
AADBX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AADBX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jun 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AADBX is a Hold and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. AADBX (106M). AADBX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: AADBX (1.79) vs RLBAX (1.14). AADBX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: AADBX (39 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). RLBAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than AADBX (0.88). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. AADBX (31.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than AADBX: RLBAX (250) vs AADBX (250000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.00 vs. AADBX (7.19). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.33 vs. AADBX (3.10).
| AADBX | RLBAX | AADBX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.32 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.32 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.564 | 8.448 | 54% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 250 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 106M | 288B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.79 | 1.14 | 157% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.19 | 15.00 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.54 | 38.97 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.10 | 32.33 | 10% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.41 | 77.86 | 27% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers