Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AADBX vs RLBAX
AADBX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts AADBX vs RLBAX
AADBX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AADBX vs. RLBAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AADBX is a Hold and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. AADBX (102M). AADBX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: AADBX (1.70) vs RLBAX (1.12). AADBX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: AADBX (39 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). RLBAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than AADBX (0.88). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. AADBX (31.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than AADBX: RLBAX (250) vs AADBX (250000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.90 vs. AADBX (2.80). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 28.03 vs. AADBX (4.31).
| AADBX | RLBAX | AADBX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.32 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.32 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.351 | 8.475 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 250 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 102M | 285B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.70 | 1.12 | 152% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.80 | 6.90 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.23 | 38.71 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.31 | 28.03 | 15% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.85 | 74.10 | 28% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers