Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AADBX vs RLBAX
AADBX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts AADBX vs RLBAX
AADBX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AADBX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jul 09, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AADBX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. AADBX (106M). AADBX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: AADBX (1.79) vs RLBAX (1.11). AADBX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: AADBX (39 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). RLBAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than AADBX (0.88). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. AADBX (31.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than AADBX: RLBAX (250) vs AADBX (250000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.16 vs. AADBX (4.32). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 29.38 vs. AADBX (1.02).
| AADBX | RLBAX | AADBX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.32 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.32 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.782 | 8.556 | 56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 250 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 106M | 288B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.79 | 1.11 | 161% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.32 | 12.16 | 35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.06 | 40.32 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.02 | 29.38 | 3% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.14 | 74.23 | 27% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement