Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AAGPX vs RMFCX
AAGPX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts AAGPX vs RMFCX
American Beacon Large Cap Value I
Price$24.31
Change+$0.14 (+0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.36B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.41
Change+$0.27 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.07B
AAGPX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AAGPX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AAGPX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. AAGPX (3.36B). AAGPX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: AAGPX (1.60) vs RMFCX (1.27). AAGPX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: AAGPX (31 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). AAGPX (0.95) and RMFCX (0.91) have similar cost to investors . RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. AAGPX (26.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than AAGPX: RMFCX (250) vs AAGPX (2500). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.38 vs. AAGPX (-0.57). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 60.49 vs. AAGPX (20.44).
| AAGPX | RMFCX | AAGPX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.91 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.91 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.279 | 11.347 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.36B | 110B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.60 | 1.27 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.57 | 11.38 | -5% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.83 | 30.87 | 32% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.44 | 60.49 | 34% |
| Returns for 10 years | -4.72 | 81.82 | -6% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement