Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AALGX vs CWGCX
AALGX vs CWGCX Comparison
Open Charts AALGX vs CWGCX
AALGX vs CWGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AALGX vs. CWGCX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AALGX is a Buy and CWGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 152B vs. AALGX (2.54B). AALGX pays higher dividends than CWGCX: AALGX (1.15) vs CWGCX (0.75). AALGX was incepted earlier than CWGCX: AALGX (39 years) vs CWGCX (25 years). CWGCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than AALGX (0.95). AALGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. CWGCX (44.00). CWGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than AALGX: CWGCX (250) vs AALGX (2000). CWGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.48 vs. AALGX (16.16). CWGCX return over 5 years is better than : 31.41 vs. AALGX (12.07).
| AALGX | CWGCX | AALGX / CWGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.48 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.48 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.591 | 15.310 | 76% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.54B | 152B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 0.75 | 154% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.16 | 21.48 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.10 | 51.16 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.07 | 31.41 | 38% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.57 | 93.16 | 46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement