Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AALGX vs CWGCX
AALGX vs CWGCX Comparison
Open Charts AALGX vs CWGCX
AALGX vs CWGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AALGX vs. CWGCX commentary
Jul 06, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AALGX is a StrongBuy and CWGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. AALGX (2.5B). AALGX pays higher dividends than CWGCX: AALGX (1.15) vs CWGCX (0.71). AALGX was incepted earlier than CWGCX: AALGX (39 years) vs CWGCX (25 years). CWGCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than AALGX (0.95). AALGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. CWGCX (44.00). CWGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than AALGX: CWGCX (250) vs AALGX (2000). CWGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.79 vs. AALGX (10.25). CWGCX return over 5 years is better than : 28.50 vs. AALGX (8.22).
| AALGX | CWGCX | AALGX / CWGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.48 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.48 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.303 | 13.805 | 75% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.5B | 160B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 0.71 | 161% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.25 | 14.79 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.61 | 44.93 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.22 | 28.50 | 29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.93 | 92.93 | 47% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers