Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AALGX vs RWICX
AALGX vs RWICX Comparison
Open Charts AALGX vs RWICX
AALGX vs RWICX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AALGX vs. RWICX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AALGX is a Buy and RWICX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWICX has more cash in the bank: 152B vs. AALGX (2.54B). AALGX pays higher dividends than RWICX: AALGX (1.15) vs RWICX (1.09). AALGX was incepted earlier than RWICX: AALGX (39 years) vs RWICX (24 years). RWICX (1.06) is less costly to investors than AALGX (0.95). AALGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. RWICX (44.00). RWICX has a lower initial minimum investment than AALGX: RWICX (250) vs AALGX (2000). RWICX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.03 vs. AALGX (16.16). RWICX return over 5 years is better than : 33.78 vs. AALGX (12.07).
| AALGX | RWICX | AALGX / RWICX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.06 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.06 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.591 | 15.508 | 75% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.54B | 152B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 1.09 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.16 | 22.03 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.10 | 53.21 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.07 | 33.78 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.57 | 96.77 | 44% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement