Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AALRX vs RMEBX
AALRX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts AALRX vs RMEBX
AALRX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AALRX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AALRX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. AALRX (2.98B). AALRX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: AALRX (1.51) vs RMEBX (0.99). AALRX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: AALRX (9 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than AALRX (0.64). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. AALRX (27.00). AALRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: AALRX (0) vs RMEBX (250). AALRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.77 vs. RMEBX (8.96). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.13 vs. AALRX (9.78).
| AALRX | RMEBX | AALRX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.07 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.07 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.256 | 9.416 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.98B | 118B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.51 | 0.99 | 152% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.77 | 8.96 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.04 | 32.63 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.78 | 36.13 | 27% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 90.64 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers