Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AALRX vs RMFCX
AALRX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts AALRX vs RMFCX
AALRX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AALRX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AALRX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. AALRX (2.96B). AALRX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: AALRX (1.57) vs RMFCX (1.19). AALRX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: AALRX (9 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than AALRX (0.64). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. AALRX (27.00). AALRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: AALRX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.24 vs. AALRX (7.88). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 35.66 vs. AALRX (5.93).
| AALRX | RMFCX | AALRX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.91 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.91 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.132 | 6.368 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.96B | 117B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.57 | 1.19 | 132% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.88 | 9.24 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.31 | 34.91 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.93 | 35.66 | 17% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 96.09 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers