AAME
Price
$2.89
Change
-$0.41 (-12.42%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
58.95M
BHF
Price
$54.94
Change
+$0.73 (+1.35%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
3.14B
41 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AAME vs BHF

Header iconAAME vs BHF Comparison
Open Charts AAME vs BHFBanner chart's image
Atlantic American
Price$2.89
Change-$0.41 (-12.42%)
Volume$181.87K
Capitalization58.95M
Brighthouse Financial
Price$54.94
Change+$0.73 (+1.35%)
Volume$1.83M
Capitalization3.14B
AAME vs BHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AAME
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AAME vs. BHF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AAME is a Buy and BHF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (AAME: $2.89 vs. BHF: $54.94)
Brand notoriety: AAME and BHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AAME: 441% vs. BHF: 160%
Market capitalization -- AAME: $58.95M vs. BHF: $3.14B
AAME [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $58.95M. BHF’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $3.14B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $132.61B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $24.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AAME’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBHF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AAME’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • BHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both AAME and BHF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AAME’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BHF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AAME’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • BHF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BHF is a better buy in the short-term than AAME.

Price Growth

AAME (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а -15.74% price change this week, while BHF (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was +21.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was -0.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.11%.

Reported Earning Dates

BHF is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (-0.02% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BHF($3.14B) has a higher market cap than AAME($58.9M). AAME has higher P/E ratio than BHF: AAME (28.90) vs BHF (6.28). AAME YTD gains are higher at: 90.572 vs. BHF (14.363). BHF has more cash in the bank: 87.5B vs. AAME (84.3M). AAME has less debt than BHF: AAME (37.8M) vs BHF (3.16B). BHF has higher revenues than AAME: BHF (6.15B) vs AAME (199M).
AAMEBHFAAME / BHF
Capitalization58.9M3.14B2%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD90.57214.363631%
P/E Ratio28.906.28460%
Revenue199M6.15B3%
Total Cash84.3M87.5B0%
Total Debt37.8M3.16B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AAME vs BHF: Fundamental Ratings
AAME
BHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6175
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
53
Fair valued
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8441
SMR RATING
1..100
9094
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3849
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2993
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AAME's Valuation (53) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as BHF (65) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that AAME’s stock grew similarly to BHF’s over the last 12 months.

BHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AAME (84) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that BHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AAME’s over the last 12 months.

AAME's SMR Rating (90) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as BHF (94) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that AAME’s stock grew similarly to BHF’s over the last 12 months.

AAME's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as BHF (49) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that AAME’s stock grew similarly to BHF’s over the last 12 months.

AAME's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BHF (93) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that AAME’s stock grew somewhat faster than BHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AAMEBHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AAME
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TNEYF4.36N/A
+0.07%
Tamarack Valley Energy, Ltd.
EMITF1.80N/A
N/A
Elbit Imaging, Ltd.
WJRYF24.25N/A
N/A
West Japan Railway Co.
MNQFF16.00N/A
N/A
Manulife Financial Corp.
MLGF20.40-0.10
-0.49%
Malaga Financial Corp.

AAME and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AAME and PRI have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AAME and PRI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AAME
1D Price
Change %
AAME100%
-12.42%
PRI - AAME
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.19%
PUK - AAME
17%
Poorly correlated
-0.76%
BHF - AAME
13%
Poorly correlated
+1.35%
BHFAN - AAME
13%
Poorly correlated
-0.73%
MFC - AAME
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.97%
More

BHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BHF has been closely correlated with LNC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BHF jumps, then LNC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BHF
1D Price
Change %
BHF100%
+1.35%
LNC - BHF
74%
Closely correlated
-1.40%
PRI - BHF
68%
Closely correlated
+0.19%
CNO - BHF
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.13%
PRU - BHF
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.68%
JXN - BHF
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.07%
More