AAME
Price
$3.34
Change
+$0.08 (+2.45%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
68.13M
PUK
Price
$26.44
Change
+$0.34 (+1.30%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
33.22B
Interact to see
Advertisement

AAME vs PUK

Header iconAAME vs PUK Comparison
Open Charts AAME vs PUKBanner chart's image
Atlantic American
Price$3.34
Change+$0.08 (+2.45%)
Volume$21.21K
Capitalization68.13M
Prudential
Price$26.44
Change+$0.34 (+1.30%)
Volume$834.45K
Capitalization33.22B
AAME vs PUK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AAME
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PUK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AAME vs. PUK commentary
Sep 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AAME is a Hold and PUK is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 05, 2025
Stock price -- (AAME: $3.34 vs. PUK: $26.44)
Brand notoriety: AAME and PUK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AAME: 55% vs. PUK: 97%
Market capitalization -- AAME: $68.13M vs. PUK: $33.22B
AAME [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $68.13M. PUK’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $33.22B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $139.47B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $25.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AAME’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePUK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AAME’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PUK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AAME is a better buy in the long-term than PUK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AAME’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PUK’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AAME’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • PUK’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PUK is a better buy in the short-term than AAME.

Price Growth

AAME (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а -0.30% price change this week, while PUK (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was +0.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was +0.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.59%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (+0.19% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PUK($33.2B) has a higher market cap than AAME($68.1M). AAME has higher P/E ratio than PUK: AAME (33.40) vs PUK (10.27). AAME YTD gains are higher at: 120.246 vs. PUK (68.375). AAME has less debt than PUK: AAME (37.8M) vs PUK (4.89B). PUK has higher revenues than AAME: PUK (8.14B) vs AAME (199M).
AAMEPUKAAME / PUK
Capitalization68.1M33.2B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD120.24668.375176%
P/E Ratio33.4010.27325%
Revenue199M8.14B2%
Total Cash84.3MN/A-
Total Debt37.8M4.89B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AAME vs PUK: Fundamental Ratings
AAME
PUK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8179
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
75100
SMR RATING
1..100
9094
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3543
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2197
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AAME's Valuation (56) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as PUK (69). This means that AAME’s stock grew similarly to PUK’s over the last 12 months.

AAME's Profit vs Risk Rating (75) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as PUK (100). This means that AAME’s stock grew similarly to PUK’s over the last 12 months.

AAME's SMR Rating (90) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as PUK (94). This means that AAME’s stock grew similarly to PUK’s over the last 12 months.

AAME's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as PUK (43). This means that AAME’s stock grew similarly to PUK’s over the last 12 months.

AAME's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for PUK (97). This means that AAME’s stock grew significantly faster than PUK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AAMEPUK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AAME
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PUK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DSHK0.12N/A
+2.13%
Drive Shack Inc.
MSLOF33.510.01
+0.03%
Mitsui O.S.K. Lines Ltd.
LPKFF9.31N/A
N/A
Lpkf Laser & Electronics AG
CURZ3.50N/A
N/A
CURZIO RESH INC.
RGRNF3.23-0.08
-2.56%
Regis Resources NL

AAME and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AAME and PRI have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AAME and PRI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AAME
1D Price
Change %
AAME100%
+2.45%
PRI - AAME
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.69%
PUK - AAME
17%
Poorly correlated
+1.30%
BHF - AAME
13%
Poorly correlated
-1.03%
BHFAN - AAME
13%
Poorly correlated
+0.53%
ABL - AAME
11%
Poorly correlated
-4.68%
More

PUK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PUK has been loosely correlated with MFC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PUK jumps, then MFC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PUK
1D Price
Change %
PUK100%
+1.30%
MFC - PUK
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.48%
AAGIY - PUK
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.19%
PNGAY - PUK
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.66%
LNC - PUK
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.16%
PRU - PUK
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.31%
More