Ad is loading...
AAMTF
Price
$0.30
Change
+$0.01 (+3.45%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
PIPR
Price
$336.11
Change
+$4.72 (+1.42%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
75 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

AAMTF vs PIPR

Header iconAAMTF vs PIPR Comparison
Open Charts AAMTF vs PIPRBanner chart's image
Armada Mercantile
Price$0.30
Change+$0.01 (+3.45%)
Volume$2.8K
CapitalizationN/A
Piper Sandler Companies
Price$336.11
Change+$4.72 (+1.42%)
Volume$82.88K
CapitalizationN/A
AAMTF vs PIPR Comparison Chart
Loading...
PIPR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AAMTF vs. PIPR commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AAMTF is a Hold and PIPR is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (AAMTF: $0.30 vs. PIPR: $336.11)
Brand notoriety: AAMTF and PIPR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AAMTF: 18% vs. PIPR: 77%
Market capitalization -- AAMTF: $6.7M vs. PIPR: $2.98B
AAMTF [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $6.7M. PIPR’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $2.98B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.53B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AAMTF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePIPR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AAMTF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PIPR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PIPR is a better buy in the long-term than AAMTF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PIPR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • PIPR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

AAMTF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +3.28% price change this week, while PIPR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +0.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +2.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

PIPR is expected to report earnings on Jan 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+2.23% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PIPR($2.98B) has a higher market cap than AAMTF($6.7M). PIPR (39.76) and AAMTF (38.61) have similar P/E ratio . PIPR YTD gains are higher at: 94.874 vs. AAMTF (1.543). AAMTF has less debt than PIPR: AAMTF (7.15K) vs PIPR (164M). PIPR has higher revenues than AAMTF: PIPR (1.3B) vs AAMTF (1.21K).
AAMTFPIPRAAMTF / PIPR
Capitalization6.7M2.98B0%
EBITDA313KN/A-
Gain YTD1.54394.8742%
P/E Ratio38.6139.7697%
Revenue1.21K1.3B0%
Total Cash5.79MN/A-
Total Debt7.15K164M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AAMTF vs PIPR: Fundamental Ratings
AAMTF
PIPR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5076
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
704
SMR RATING
1..100
8653
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4637
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9967
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PIPR's Valuation (32) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AAMTF (76). This means that PIPR’s stock grew somewhat faster than AAMTF’s over the last 12 months.

PIPR's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AAMTF (70). This means that PIPR’s stock grew significantly faster than AAMTF’s over the last 12 months.

PIPR's SMR Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AAMTF (86). This means that PIPR’s stock grew somewhat faster than AAMTF’s over the last 12 months.

PIPR's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as AAMTF (46). This means that PIPR’s stock grew similarly to AAMTF’s over the last 12 months.

PIPR's P/E Growth Rating (67) in the null industry is in the same range as AAMTF (99). This means that PIPR’s stock grew similarly to AAMTF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PIPR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
PIPR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FARCX16.550.04
+0.24%
Nuveen Real Estate Securities I
ASIYX29.38-0.09
-0.31%
Invesco EQV Asia Pacific Equity Y
HISFX17.64-0.07
-0.40%
Hennessy Small Cap Financial Instl
VWELX46.57-0.38
-0.81%
Vanguard Wellington™ Inv
IHOFX18.33-0.20
-1.08%
Hartford International Opportunities F

AAMTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AAMTF and DSEEY have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AAMTF and DSEEY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AAMTF
1D Price
Change %
AAMTF100%
+3.28%
DSEEY - AAMTF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.97%
SNEX - AAMTF
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.52%
ASXFF - AAMTF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.36%
ABSOF - AAMTF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PIPR - AAMTF
-0%
Poorly correlated
+1.42%
More

PIPR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PIPR has been closely correlated with EVR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PIPR jumps, then EVR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PIPR
1D Price
Change %
PIPR100%
+1.42%
EVR - PIPR
83%
Closely correlated
-0.09%
MC - PIPR
81%
Closely correlated
-2.15%
SF - PIPR
77%
Closely correlated
-0.98%
HLI - PIPR
76%
Closely correlated
+0.02%
GS - PIPR
75%
Closely correlated
+0.84%
More