Advertisement
PIPR vs RJF
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Piper Sandler Companies (PIPR) vs. Raymond James Financial (RJF) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both PIPR and RJF have posted modest year-to-date gains of approximately 4-5% amid a resilient financial services sector.
- RJF boasts a significantly larger market capitalization of nearly $30 billion compared to PIPR's $6.3 billion, reflecting its diversified operations.
- RJF reported record Q2 fiscal 2026 revenues of $3.86 billion, up 13% year-over-year, with adjusted EPS of $2.83 beating estimates.
- PIPR delivered strong Q4 2025 results with revenue of $635 million and EPS of $1.72, surpassing expectations ahead of its upcoming Q1 report.
- RJF trades at a lower price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 14.5 versus PIPR's 22.2, suggesting relatively cheaper valuation.
- Recent analyst actions show optimism for both, with price target increases for PIPR and positive earnings reactions for RJF.
Introduction
Piper Sandler Companies (PIPR) and Raymond James Financial (RJF) represent key players in the financial services sector, with PIPR focusing on investment banking and institutional brokerage, while RJF offers a broader mix including wealth management and banking. This comparison is particularly relevant for traders eyeing relative performance in capital markets and brokerage stocks, as well as investors assessing sector exposure amid fluctuating interest rates and M&A (mergers and acquisitions) activity. Recent market activity highlights contrasts in earnings momentum and valuation, aiding decisions on positioning in this cyclical industry.
PIPR Overview and Recent Performance
Piper Sandler Companies (PIPR) is an investment bank and institutional securities firm serving corporations, private equity, public entities, and investors through services like advisory, equity and fixed income trading, public finance, and alternative asset management. In recent market activity, the stock has traded around $88, with a 52-week range of $58 to $95 and year-to-date gains of about 5%. Sentiment has benefited from strong Q4 2025 results, including $635 million in revenue and EPS of $1.72 beating estimates, driven by robust investment banking fees. Analyst price target raises, such as to $97 by Goldman Sachs, have supported upward momentum in recent weeks, though upcoming Q1 earnings on May 1 could introduce volatility tied to deal flow and trading volumes.
RJF Overview and Recent Performance
Raymond James Financial, Inc. (RJF) is a diversified financial services provider offering private client group services, capital markets, asset management, and banking to individuals, corporations, and municipalities across the U.S., Canada, and Europe. The stock recently closed near $153, within a 52-week range of $134 to $178, reflecting year-to-date appreciation of roughly 4%. Key recent developments include record Q2 fiscal 2026 net revenues of $3.86 billion, a 13% year-over-year increase, fueled by asset management growth and adviser recruiting, with adjusted EPS of $2.83 exceeding forecasts. A new $2 billion share repurchase program has bolstered positive sentiment, contributing to steady performance amid stable net interest income (NII).
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases 25 top-performing AI trading bots curated from over 350 available bots that trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto using diverse machine learning strategies. These bots feature impressive stats, with annualized returns ranging from 15% to 170%, win rates of 48% to 88%, and profit factors up to 11.7, operating on short timeframes like 5-minute to 60-minute charts. Strategies vary from swing trading dips in industrials to multi-agent plays in semiconductors (e.g., NVDA, AMD) and leveraged ETFs, with average trade durations of 1 to 55 days and profit-to-drawdown ratios exceeding 20 in top cases. Tailored for current market conditions like volatility in tech and energy, they offer styles from trend-following to signal-based signals. Traders can explore these high-conviction bots for potential edge in dynamic environments.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Business models differ markedly: PIPR emphasizes boutique investment banking and trading, exposing it to cyclical M&A and capital markets volatility, while RJF derives stability from recurring wealth management fees and banking, with larger assets under management (AUM). Growth drivers include RJF's net new assets from recruiting and PIPR's deal advisory uptick. Recent momentum favors RJF post-earnings, though PIPR shows analyst-driven gains. Risk factors: PIPR faces higher earnings variability versus RJF's diversification; both share sector exposure to rates and regulation. Market sentiment leans positive for both, with RJF's lower P/E signaling value trade-offs against PIPR's growth potential.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward RJF based on superior trend consistency from recent record revenues, diversified revenue streams reducing cyclical risks, and stronger relative positioning with lower valuation multiples amid positive earnings catalysts. While PIPR offers upside from investment banking recovery, RJF's stability and momentum provide a probabilistic edge in the near term.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PIPR is a StrongBuy and RJF is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PIPR’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRJF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- PIPR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- RJF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PIPR’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RJF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- PIPR’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- RJF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
PIPR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +3.10% price change this week, while RJF (@Investment Managers) price change was +1.95% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +1.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.85%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +1.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.30%.
Reported Earning Dates
PIPR is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2026.
RJF is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Banks/Brokers (+1.59% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
@Investment Managers (+1.75% weekly)Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
| PIPR | RJF | PIPR / RJF | |
| Capitalization | 5.34B | 30.1B | 18% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.904 | -3.169 | 155% |
| P/E Ratio | 19.94 | 14.58 | 137% |
| Revenue | 1.95B | 14.5B | 13% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 2.61B | - |
| Total Debt | 112M | 4.22B | 3% |
PIPR | RJF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 83 | 78 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 16 Undervalued | 68 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 21 | 33 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 41 | 15 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 50 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 47 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PIPR's Valuation (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RJF (68) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that PIPR’s stock grew somewhat faster than RJF’s over the last 12 months.
PIPR's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the null industry is in the same range as RJF (33) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that PIPR’s stock grew similarly to RJF’s over the last 12 months.
RJF's SMR Rating (15) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as PIPR (41) in the null industry. This means that RJF’s stock grew similarly to PIPR’s over the last 12 months.
PIPR's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as RJF (53) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that PIPR’s stock grew similarly to RJF’s over the last 12 months.
RJF's P/E Growth Rating (50) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as PIPR (64) in the null industry. This means that RJF’s stock grew similarly to PIPR’s over the last 12 months.
| PIPR | RJF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 72% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 55% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 59% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 60% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 10 days ago 59% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 63% | 4 days ago 58% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 57% | 3 days ago 59% |
Advertisement
PIPR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PIPR has been closely correlated with RJF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PIPR jumps, then RJF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PIPR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIPR | 100% | +1.45% | ||
| RJF - PIPR | 78% Closely correlated | +2.65% | ||
| EVR - PIPR | 77% Closely correlated | +0.64% | ||
| MC - PIPR | 76% Closely correlated | -1.78% | ||
| PWP - PIPR | 75% Closely correlated | +1.23% | ||
| SF - PIPR | 73% Closely correlated | +1.76% | ||
More | ||||
RJF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RJF has been closely correlated with SF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RJF jumps, then SF could also see price increases.