Advertisement
PIPR vs RJF
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Piper Sandler (PIPR) vs. Raymond James Financial (RJF) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- PIPR is a mid-sized investment bank with a focus on advisory and capital markets services, while RJF operates a larger integrated platform combining wealth management, brokerage, and banking services.
- Both stocks have shown moderate year-to-date gains amid broader financial sector activity, with RJF benefiting from scale and diversified revenue streams compared to PIPR's more cyclical exposure to deal flow.
- Recent market activity reflects anticipation around upcoming quarterly results, including PIPR's second-quarter 2026 earnings scheduled for July 30 and RJF's third-quarter report expected around July 22.
- RJF maintains a larger market capitalization and consistent dividend payouts, contributing to relative stability, whereas PIPR exhibits higher volatility tied to investment banking cycles.
- Sector sentiment for both remains influenced by macroeconomic factors such as interest rates and M&A (mergers and acquisitions) activity, with limited differentiation in short-term momentum over recent weeks.
- Relative positioning favors diversification for RJF, while PIPR offers concentrated exposure to advisory growth opportunities.
Introduction
Piper Sandler Companies (PIPR) and Raymond James Financial (RJF) represent two established players in the financial services sector, each with distinct business models centered on investment banking, wealth management, and capital markets activities. This comparison examines their recent performance, operational characteristics, and market positioning to assist investors and traders evaluating exposure within the broader financial industry. The analysis is particularly relevant for those seeking to understand relative strengths in advisory services versus integrated wealth platforms amid evolving economic conditions.
PIPR Overview and Recent Performance
Piper Sandler Companies (PIPR) operates as a leading investment bank, providing advisory, equity and debt capital markets, and research services primarily to middle-market clients. In recent weeks, the stock has traded in a range influenced by broader market sentiment and anticipation of its second-quarter 2026 financial results, scheduled for release on July 30. Year-to-date returns stand near 8%, with the share price fluctuating around the mid-$70s amid typical volatility associated with deal-dependent revenue streams. Recent market activity shows modest movements tied to sector-wide developments in mergers and acquisitions, without standout catalysts beyond routine earnings expectations.
RJF Overview and Recent Performance
Raymond James Financial (RJF) delivers a diversified suite of services including wealth management, private client brokerage, capital markets, and banking. Over recent weeks, the stock has reflected steady positioning supported by its scale and recurring revenue elements, with prices hovering near $168-$169. The company declared a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share payable in mid-July, underscoring its commitment to shareholder returns. Market activity has been shaped by expectations for its third-quarter 2026 earnings report, anticipated around July 22, alongside general financial sector trends.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of high-performing AI trading bots from its extensive library of hundreds available across thousands of tickers. Only those demonstrating strong suitability for prevailing market conditions earn placement in this section, based on rigorous performance metrics. Bots in the ecosystem feature varied trading styles, strategies, timeframes, and statistical profiles, including ranges of win rates, profit factors, and drawdown statistics that appeal to different risk tolerances. This resource provides traders with data-driven insights into automated strategies adaptable to stocks like those discussed here. Explore the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page for detailed bot specifications and historical results.
Head-to-Head Comparison
In terms of business model, PIPR emphasizes specialized investment banking and advisory work, leading to greater sensitivity to transaction volumes, while RJF benefits from a broader wealth management franchise that generates more stable fee-based income. Growth drivers differ accordingly: PIPR may capitalize on advisory mandates during active M&A periods, whereas RJF draws from client asset growth and lending activities. Recent momentum shows both stocks aligning with financial sector patterns, though RJF’s larger capitalization and dividend history provide a buffer against volatility. Risk factors include cyclical exposure for PIPR versus regulatory and interest-rate sensitivities for RJF. Sector exposure overlaps in capital markets but diverges in client focus, with market sentiment remaining neutral pending earnings updates.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, revenue diversification, and positioning ahead of earnings releases, Tickeron’s AI models would currently assign a modest probabilistic edge to RJF due to its scale and recurring revenue characteristics, which may support greater stability in uncertain environments. PIPR presents a viable alternative for those targeting concentrated advisory exposure. This assessment reflects relative data patterns rather than forecasts.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PIPR is a Buy and RJF is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PIPR’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRJF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- PIPR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- RJF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PIPR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RJF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- PIPR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- RJF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
PIPR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -0.30% price change this week, while RJF (@Investment Managers) price change was +0.56% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +0.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was -18.58%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -3.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was -12.08%.
Reported Earning Dates
PIPR is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2026.
RJF is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Banks/Brokers (+0.63% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
@Investment Managers (-3.16% weekly)Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
| PIPR | RJF | PIPR / RJF | |
| Capitalization | 5.14B | 32.5B | 16% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.465 | 6.554 | -129% |
| P/E Ratio | 19.19 | 14.76 | 130% |
| Revenue | 1.95B | 14.5B | 13% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 2.61B | - |
| Total Debt | 112M | 4.22B | 3% |
PIPR | RJF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 53 | 58 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 15 Undervalued | 71 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 23 | 26 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 41 | 15 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 70 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 82 | 60 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PIPR's Valuation (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RJF (71) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that PIPR’s stock grew somewhat faster than RJF’s over the last 12 months.
PIPR's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the null industry is in the same range as RJF (26) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that PIPR’s stock grew similarly to RJF’s over the last 12 months.
RJF's SMR Rating (15) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as PIPR (41) in the null industry. This means that RJF’s stock grew similarly to PIPR’s over the last 12 months.
RJF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as PIPR (70) in the null industry. This means that RJF’s stock grew similarly to PIPR’s over the last 12 months.
RJF's P/E Growth Rating (60) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as PIPR (82) in the null industry. This means that RJF’s stock grew similarly to PIPR’s over the last 12 months.
| PIPR | RJF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 52% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 72% | 11 days ago 60% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 5 days ago 58% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 48% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 55% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TCAL | 22.63 | 0.15 | +0.67% |
| T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF | |||
| GDXU | 80.03 | 0.42 | +0.53% |
| MicroSectors™ Gold Miners 3X Lvrgd ETN | |||
| EMDV | 46.30 | N/A | N/A |
| ProShares MSCI Emerg Mkts Div Growers | |||
| DVY | 159.46 | N/A | N/A |
| iShares Select Dividend ETF | |||
| VFL | 10.31 | N/A | N/A |
| abrdn National Municipal Income Fund | |||
PIPR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PIPR has been closely correlated with RJF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PIPR jumps, then RJF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PIPR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIPR | 100% | +0.37% | ||
| RJF - PIPR | 78% Closely correlated | +1.90% | ||
| EVR - PIPR | 77% Closely correlated | +1.44% | ||
| PWP - PIPR | 74% Closely correlated | +4.75% | ||
| MC - PIPR | 74% Closely correlated | +2.18% | ||
| SF - PIPR | 72% Closely correlated | +1.58% | ||
More | ||||
RJF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RJF has been closely correlated with SF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RJF jumps, then SF could also see price increases.