Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AAMTX vs FDEWX
AAMTX vs FDEWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AAMTX vs. FDEWX commentary
Aug 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AAMTX is a Hold and FDEWX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AAMTX has more cash in the bank: 27.4B vs. FDEWX (17.5B). FDEWX pays higher dividends than AAMTX: FDEWX (1.79) vs AAMTX (0.83). AAMTX was incepted earlier than FDEWX: AAMTX (16 years) vs FDEWX (14 years). AAMTX (0.73) is less costly to investors than FDEWX (0.12). FDEWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 12.00 vs. AAMTX (5.00). FDEWX has a lower initial minimum investment than AAMTX: FDEWX (0) vs AAMTX (250). FDEWX (18.44) and AAMTX (17.67) have marching annual gain over last year. FDEWX return over 5 years is better than : 61.48 vs. AAMTX (42.52).
| AAMTX | FDEWX | AAMTX / FDEWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.12 | 608% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.12 | 608% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.218 | 12.135 | 109% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.4B | 17.5B | 157% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.83 | 1.79 | 46% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.67 | 18.44 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.31 | 42.30 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.52 | 61.48 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.85 | 107.19 | 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers