Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AAOTX vs FFSFX
AAOTX vs FFSFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AAOTX vs. FFSFX commentary
Oct 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AAOTX is a Hold and FFSFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AAOTX has more cash in the bank: 5.69B vs. FFSFX (2.53B). FFSFX pays higher dividends than AAOTX: FFSFX (0.87) vs AAOTX (0.71). AAOTX was incepted earlier than FFSFX: AAOTX (6 years) vs FFSFX (6 years). AAOTX (0.74) is less costly to investors than FFSFX (0.68). FFSFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. AAOTX (4.00). FFSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than AAOTX: FFSFX (0) vs AAOTX (250). AAOTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.96 vs. FFSFX (14.17). AAOTX return over 5 years is better than : 59.80 vs. FFSFX (48.50).
| AAOTX | FFSFX | AAOTX / FFSFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.68 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.68 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.297 | 17.962 | 102% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.69B | 2.53B | 225% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.71 | 0.87 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.96 | 14.17 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.12 | 67.65 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.80 | 48.50 | 123% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers