Ad is loading...
AAOTX vs FFSFX
AAOTX vs FFSFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AAOTX vs. FFSFX commentary
May 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AAOTX is a Hold and FFSFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AAOTX has more cash in the bank: 4.23B vs. FFSFX (1.86B). FFSFX pays higher dividends than AAOTX: FFSFX (1.03) vs AAOTX (0.84). AAOTX was incepted earlier than FFSFX: AAOTX (5 years) vs FFSFX (6 years). FFSFX (0.75) and AAOTX (0.74) have similar cost to investors . FFSFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 12.00 vs. AAOTX (4.00). FFSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than AAOTX: FFSFX (0) vs AAOTX (250). FFSFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.60 vs. AAOTX (8.04). AAOTX return over 5 years is better than : 61.52 vs. FFSFX (55.78).
| AAOTX | FFSFX | AAOTX / FFSFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.75 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.75 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.093 | 0.679 | -161% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.23B | 1.86B | 228% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 1.03 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.04 | 8.60 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.48 | 20.12 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.52 | 55.78 | 110% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...