Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AASCX vs FSMAX
AASCX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts AASCX vs FSMAX
AASCX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AASCX vs. FSMAX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AASCX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. AASCX (3.14B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than AASCX: FSMAX (0.50) vs AASCX (0.31). AASCX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: AASCX (33 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). AASCX (0.97) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). AASCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than AASCX: FSMAX (0) vs AASCX (2000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.68 vs. AASCX (8.99). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 40.14 vs. AASCX (-1.25).
| AASCX | FSMAX | AASCX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.04 | 2,771% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.04 | 2,771% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.392 | 16.937 | 114% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.14B | 40.1B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 0.50 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.99 | 23.68 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.54 | 72.74 | 30% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.25 | 40.14 | -3% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.21 | 134.49 | 42% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement