Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AASCX vs FSMAX
AASCX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts AASCX vs FSMAX
AASCX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AASCX vs. FSMAX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AASCX is a Buy and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. AASCX (3.12B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than AASCX: FSMAX (0.50) vs AASCX (0.31). AASCX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: AASCX (33 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). AASCX (0.97) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). AASCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than AASCX: FSMAX (0) vs AASCX (2000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.57 vs. AASCX (7.04). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.18 vs. AASCX (-2.96).
| AASCX | FSMAX | AASCX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.04 | 2,771% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.04 | 2,771% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.909 | 13.370 | 134% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.12B | 40.1B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 0.50 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.04 | 20.57 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.49 | 55.83 | 22% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.96 | 33.18 | -9% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.31 | 133.82 | 44% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement