Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AASCX vs FSMDX
AASCX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts AASCX vs FSMDX
AASCX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AASCX vs. FSMDX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AASCX is a Hold and FSMDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 52.1B vs. AASCX (3.14B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than AASCX: FSMDX (0.76) vs AASCX (0.31). AASCX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: AASCX (33 years) vs FSMDX (15 years). AASCX (0.97) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). AASCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than AASCX: FSMDX (0) vs AASCX (2000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.53 vs. AASCX (8.99). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 47.15 vs. AASCX (-1.25).
| AASCX | FSMDX | AASCX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.03 | 3,880% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.03 | 3,880% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.392 | 17.736 | 109% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.14B | 52.1B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 0.76 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.99 | 21.53 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.54 | 63.59 | 34% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.25 | 47.15 | -3% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.21 | 166.80 | 34% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement