Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AASCX vs FSMDX
AASCX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts AASCX vs FSMDX
AASCX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AASCX vs. FSMDX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AASCX is a Buy and FSMDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 52.1B vs. AASCX (3.12B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than AASCX: FSMDX (0.76) vs AASCX (0.31). AASCX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: AASCX (33 years) vs FSMDX (15 years). AASCX (0.97) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). AASCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than AASCX: FSMDX (0) vs AASCX (2000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.74 vs. AASCX (7.04). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 42.85 vs. AASCX (-2.96).
| AASCX | FSMDX | AASCX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.03 | 3,880% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.03 | 3,880% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.909 | 14.622 | 122% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.12B | 52.1B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 0.76 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.04 | 18.74 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.49 | 50.09 | 25% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.96 | 42.85 | -7% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.31 | 165.64 | 36% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement