Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AASCX vs FSMDX
AASCX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts AASCX vs FSMDX
AASCX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AASCX vs. FSMDX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AASCX is a Hold and FSMDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 51.5B vs. AASCX (3.09B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than AASCX: FSMDX (0.99) vs AASCX (0.32). AASCX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: AASCX (33 years) vs FSMDX (15 years). AASCX (0.97) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). AASCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than AASCX: FSMDX (0) vs AASCX (2000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.46 vs. AASCX (6.46). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 42.72 vs. AASCX (-4.07).
| AASCX | FSMDX | AASCX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.03 | 3,880% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.03 | 3,880% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.087 | 11.996 | 126% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.09B | 51.5B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 0.99 | 32% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.46 | 22.46 | 29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.22 | 59.36 | 34% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.07 | 42.72 | -10% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.39 | 166.70 | 35% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement