Ad is loading...
AASCX vs VIMSX
AASCX vs VIMSX Comparison
Open Charts AASCX vs VIMSX
Thrivent Mid Cap Stock A
Price$28.36
Change+$0.22 (+0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.37B
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Investor
Price$69.90
Change+$0.39 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets175.23B
AASCX vs VIMSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AASCX vs. VIMSX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AASCX is a Buy and VIMSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMSX has more cash in the bank: 175B vs. AASCX (3.37B). VIMSX pays higher dividends than AASCX: VIMSX (1.46) vs AASCX (0.41). AASCX was incepted earlier than VIMSX: AASCX (32 years) vs VIMSX (27 years). AASCX (0.96) is less costly to investors than VIMSX (0.17). AASCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. VIMSX (16.00). AASCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIMSX: AASCX (2000) vs VIMSX (3000). VIMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.38 vs. AASCX (-6.88). VIMSX return over 5 years is better than : 70.68 vs. AASCX (44.16).
| AASCX | VIMSX | AASCX / VIMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.17 | 565% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.17 | 565% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.588 | -3.496 | 188% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 3000 | 67% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.37B | 175B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.41 | 1.46 | 28% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.88 | 5.38 | -128% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.21 | 17.13 | 13% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.16 | 70.68 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.06 | 100.19 | 31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers