Ad is loading...
AATSX vs FSSNX
AATSX vs FSSNX Comparison
Open Charts AATSX vs FSSNX
Ancora/Thelen Small-Mid Cap S
Price$19.56
Change-$0.40 (-2.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets194.76M
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$27.28
Change-$0.83 (-2.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.16B
AATSX vs FSSNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AATSX vs. FSSNX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AATSX is a Hold and FSSNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 27.2B vs. AATSX (195M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than AATSX: FSSNX (1.36) vs AATSX (1.03). AATSX was incepted earlier than FSSNX: AATSX (10 years) vs FSSNX (13 years). AATSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.30 vs. FSSNX (9.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than AATSX: FSSNX (0) vs AATSX (1500000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.61 vs. AATSX (8.83). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 36.70 vs. AATSX (24.33).
| AATSX | FSSNX | AATSX / FSSNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.462 | -1.445 | -32% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 195M | 27.2B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 1.36 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.83 | 10.61 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.42 | 16.37 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.33 | 36.70 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 73.57 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...