Ad is loading...
AATSX vs FSSNX
AATSX vs FSSNX Comparison
Open Charts AATSX vs FSSNX
Ancora/Thelen Small-Mid Cap S
Price$20.36
Change+$0.06 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets201.65M
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$28.74
Change+$0.14 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.09B
AATSX vs FSSNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AATSX vs. FSSNX commentary
Jan 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AATSX is a Hold and FSSNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 27.1B vs. AATSX (202M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than AATSX: FSSNX (1.36) vs AATSX (1.03). AATSX was incepted earlier than FSSNX: AATSX (10 years) vs FSSNX (13 years). AATSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.30 vs. FSSNX (9.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than AATSX: FSSNX (0) vs AATSX (1500000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.29 vs. AATSX (16.76). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 44.88 vs. AATSX (30.41).
| AATSX | FSSNX | AATSX / FSSNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.263 | 3.324 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 202M | 27.1B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 1.36 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.76 | 18.29 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.64 | 21.60 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.41 | 44.88 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 89.10 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...