Ad is loading...
AATSX vs FSSNX
AATSX vs FSSNX Comparison
Open Charts AATSX vs FSSNX
Ancora/Thelen Small-Mid Cap S
Price$21.37
Change-$0.24 (-1.11%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$29.19
Change-$0.40 (-1.35%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
AATSX vs FSSNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AATSX vs. FSSNX commentary
Nov 15, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AATSX is a Buy and FSSNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 26.9B vs. AATSX (200M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than AATSX: FSSNX (1.36) vs AATSX (1.03). AATSX was incepted earlier than FSSNX: AATSX (9 years) vs FSSNX (13 years). AATSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.30 vs. FSSNX (9.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than AATSX: FSSNX (0) vs AATSX (1500000). FSSNX (33.68) and AATSX (33.10) have marching annual gain over last year. FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 51.61 vs. AATSX (42.27).
| AATSX | FSSNX | AATSX / FSSNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.506 | 18.330 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 200M | 26.9B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 1.36 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.10 | 33.68 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.28 | 0.32 | -1,036% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.27 | 51.61 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 93.17 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...