Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AATSX vs FSSNX
AATSX vs FSSNX Comparison
Open Charts AATSX vs FSSNX
Ancora/Thelen Small-Mid Cap S
Price$19.59
Change-$0.03 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets208.58M
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$27.75
Change-$0.02 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.89B
AATSX vs FSSNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AATSX vs. FSSNX commentary
Aug 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AATSX is a Buy and FSSNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 25.9B vs. AATSX (209M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than AATSX: FSSNX (0.90) vs AATSX (0.38). AATSX was incepted earlier than FSSNX: AATSX (10 years) vs FSSNX (14 years). AATSX (1.21) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). AATSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.19 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than AATSX: FSSNX (0) vs AATSX (1500000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.24 vs. AATSX (4.47). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 46.44 vs. AATSX (38.62).
| AATSX | FSSNX | AATSX / FSSNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.03 | 4,040% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.03 | 4,840% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.770 | 0.325 | 237% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 209M | 25.9B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.38 | 0.90 | 42% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.47 | 8.24 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.01 | 15.38 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.62 | 46.44 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.38 | 80.39 | 65% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement