Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AATSX vs FSSNX
AATSX vs FSSNX Comparison
Open Charts AATSX vs FSSNX
AATSX vs FSSNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AATSX vs. FSSNX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AATSX is a Hold and FSSNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34.5B vs. AATSX (217M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than AATSX: FSSNX (1.05) vs AATSX (0.36). AATSX was incepted earlier than FSSNX: AATSX (11 years) vs FSSNX (15 years). AATSX (1.19) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). AATSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.92 vs. FSSNX (80.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than AATSX: FSSNX (0) vs AATSX (1500000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.98 vs. AATSX (-7.46). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 36.23 vs. AATSX (-8.71).
| AATSX | FSSNX | AATSX / FSSNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.03 | 4,000% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.03 | 4,760% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.190 | 17.495 | 13% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 217M | 34.5B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.36 | 1.05 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.46 | 20.98 | -36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.87 | 62.87 | 32% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.71 | 36.23 | -24% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.31 | 140.89 | 36% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement