AB
Price
$36.44
Change
+$0.04 (+0.11%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
3.4B
39 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VRTS
Price
$145.18
Change
+$2.59 (+1.82%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
970.11M
40 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AB vs VRTS

Header iconAB vs VRTS Comparison
Open Charts AB vs VRTSBanner chart's image
AB vs VRTS Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AB vs. VRTS commentary
Jun 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AB is a Hold and VRTS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 14, 2026
Stock price -- (AB: $36.44 vs. VRTS: $145.18)
Brand notoriety: AB and VRTS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AB: 151% vs. VRTS: 74%
Market capitalization -- AB: $3.4B vs. VRTS: $970.11M
AB [@Investment Managers] is valued at $3.4B. VRTS’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $970.11M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $160.2B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $9.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVRTS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • VRTS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, AB is a better buy in the long-term than VRTS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VRTS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • VRTS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, VRTS is a better buy in the short-term than AB.

Price Growth

AB (@Investment Managers) experienced а -2.20% price change this week, while VRTS (@Investment Managers) price change was -0.95% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +1.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.30%.

Reported Earning Dates

AB is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.

VRTS is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+1.75% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AB($3.4B) has a higher market cap than VRTS($970M). AB has higher P/E ratio than VRTS: AB (11.32) vs VRTS (8.56). AB YTD gains are higher at: -0.957 vs. VRTS (-8.174). VRTS has higher revenues than AB: VRTS (829M) vs AB (342M).
ABVRTSAB / VRTS
Capitalization3.4B970M351%
EBITDAN/A389M-
Gain YTD-0.957-8.17412%
P/E Ratio11.328.56132%
Revenue342M829M41%
Total CashN/A273M-
Total DebtN/A2.85B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AB vs VRTS: Fundamental Ratings
AB
VRTS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
489
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10063
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7053
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4771
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2850

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AB's Valuation (6) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as VRTS (8). This means that AB’s stock grew similarly to VRTS’s over the last 12 months.

AB's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as VRTS (100). This means that AB’s stock grew similarly to VRTS’s over the last 12 months.

VRTS's SMR Rating (63) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AB (100). This means that VRTS’s stock grew somewhat faster than AB’s over the last 12 months.

VRTS's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as AB (70). This means that VRTS’s stock grew similarly to AB’s over the last 12 months.

AB's P/E Growth Rating (47) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as VRTS (71). This means that AB’s stock grew similarly to VRTS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ABVRTS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VRTS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KCE154.602.43
+1.60%
State Street® SPDR® S&P® Cap Mkts ETF
BKSE130.070.99
+0.76%
BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF
IBDS24.17N/A
N/A
iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Corp ETF
MYCI24.75N/A
-0.01%
State Street® My2029 Corporate Bond ETF
DIME8.10-0.01
-0.06%
CoinShares Altcoins ETF

AB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AB has been loosely correlated with NEWT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AB jumps, then NEWT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AB
1D Price
Change %
AB100%
+0.11%
NEWT - AB
40%
Loosely correlated
+2.19%
BBUC - AB
36%
Loosely correlated
+2.44%
APAM - AB
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.13%
BEN - AB
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.01%
VRTS - AB
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.82%
More

VRTS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VRTS has been loosely correlated with BLK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VRTS jumps, then BLK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VRTS
1D Price
Change %
VRTS100%
+1.82%
BLK - VRTS
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.52%
FHI - VRTS
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.66%
SEIC - VRTS
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.42%
TROW - VRTS
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.27%
KKR - VRTS
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.99%
More